Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Lingua inglese 2: "Discourse analysis", Sintesi del corso di Lingua Inglese

Appunti + integrazione libri + slide per la preparazione dell'esame di Lingua Inglese 2; parte relativa al "discourse analysis".

Tipologia: Sintesi del corso

2018/2019

Caricato il 11/03/2019

mrtn-pnn
mrtn-pnn 🇮🇹

4.4

(49)

22 documenti

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
The term “discourse” is used for both spoken and written language with particular attention to:
a wide variety of other factors that are more social in nature → who produces/receives the discourse, in
which setting, for what reason ecc.
refers to systematic variation between different kinds of texts based on features internal to the text and
external to the text.
is more complete than text linguistics and text types which refers mostly to the internal features.
Discourse analysis focuses on
• relationship between language and the social and cultural contexts in which it is used.
• how language presents different views of the world and different understandings.
• how we construct our views of the world and our identities through the language we use.
“Discourse analysis” → introduced by Harris (1952) to:
study language beyond the level of the sentence → describing features and styles of texts.
understand the relationship between linguistic/non-linguistic behaviour → motivation for using
language in certain ways/contexts.
Different “discourses” share particular meanings and have characteristic linguistic features associated with
them understanding both of them is the objective of discourse analysis.
The relationship between language and context.
It means how people know, from the situation they are in, how to interpret what someone says.
contexts are not objective conditions: subjective ones that we constantly update we interact with
each other in our social groups.
The same discourse can be understood differently by different language users as well as understood
differently in different contexts.
So in order to understand the meaning of what a person says or writes we need to know something about
the situational and cultural context in which it is located.
context of situation In the context of situation the reader must identify:
-the FIELD: what is being spoken about?
-the TENOR: what are the relationships?
-the MODE: what are the circumstances in which the communication takes place?
context of culture → meanings/assumptions that people in a certain culture share. It also incorporates
the culturally evolved expectations of ways of behaving and getting things done.
pf3
pf4

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Lingua inglese 2: "Discourse analysis" e più Sintesi del corso in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

The term “ discourse ” is used for both spoken and written language with particular attention to:

  • a wide variety of other factors that are more social in nature → who produces/receives the discourse, in which setting, for what reason ecc.
  • refers to systematic variation between different kinds of texts based on features internal to the text and external to the text.
  • is more complete than text linguistics and text types which refers mostly to the internal features. Discourse analysis focuses on
  • relationship between language and the social and cultural contexts in which it is used.
  • how language presents different views of the world and different understandings.
  • how we construct our views of the world and our identities through the language we use. “Discourse analysis” → introduced by Harris (1952) to:
  • study language beyond the level of the sentence → describing features and styles of texts.
  • understand the relationship between linguistic/non-linguistic behaviour → motivation for using language in certain ways/contexts. Different “discourses” share particular meanings and have characteristic linguistic features associated with them → understanding both of them is the objective of discourse analysis.

The relationship between language and context.

It means how people know, from the situation they are in, how to interpret what someone says. ➔ contexts are not objective conditions : subjective ones that we constantly update we interact with each other in our social groups. The same discourse can be understood differently by different language users as well as understood differently in different contexts. So in order to understand the meaning of what a person says or writes we need to know something about the situational and cultural context in which it is located.

  • context of situation → In the context of situation the reader must identify:
  • the FIELD: what is being spoken about?
  • the TENOR: what are the relationships?
  • the MODE: what are the circumstances in which the communication takes place?
  • context of culture → meanings/assumptions that people in a certain culture share. It also incorporates the culturally evolved expectations of ways of behaving and getting things done.

THE DISCORSE STRUCTURE OF TEXTS

  • Discourse analysts are also interested in how people organize what they say/write → what they typically say first, second, etc. → often varies across cultures.
  • Discourse structure → spoken/written discourse is organized into STAGES or STEPS that reflect the context of situation/culture.
  • Our social experience tells us how these types of interactions will start and end, and what kind of language will typically be used. ➔ Different cultures often have different ways of doing things through language : ETHNOGRAPHY OF COMMUNICATION. This is a reaction against theoretical descriptions of language that paid little attention to social and cultural contexts → “speech events” = who is speaking to whom, about what, for what purpose, where and when, and how these impact on how we say and do things in culture-specific settings. DISCOURSE AS THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY → it means that texts are communicative units which are embedded in social and cultural practices. The texts we write and speak both shape and are shaped by these practices. Whenever people argue about words (ex: “gay” “queer” “The china price”), they are also arguing about the assumptions and values that have clustered around those words in the course of their history of being used. In addition to language, we use extra-linguistic displays to communicate our social identities → dress, gestures, ways of interacting all convey our thoughts, attitudes, values and beliefs, adjusted appropriately to time/place. DISCOURSE AND PERFORMANCE → Discourse is a like ' dance ' that we perform as a coordination of language, beliefs, attitudes, values, depending on a particular time, place and circumstances → never exactly the same
  • The notion of performativity → when we say something, we also do it (speech act theory) DISCOURSE AND INTERTEXTUALITY → All texts (spoken and written) are in an intertextual relationship with other textstheir meanings draw on meanings of other texts and we understand their meanings in relation to other texts.
  • Intertextuality : the presence in one text of references (more or less explicit) to other texts. How texts ‘borrow” things from other texts.
  • the intended audience of the text;
  • the situation in which the text occurs, particular features (e.g. 'Once upon a time‘), the content of the text, the level of formality/informality, style, spoken vs. written text. But what to one person may be an instance of a particular genre may, to another person, be more like an instance of another. Communicative purpose is a key criterion, but a particular genre can have more than one communicative purpose. Assigning a text to a genre category → not an exact match of certain characteristics, but sufficient similarity with other examples of a particular genre: in some cases the text might be considered a “best example” of the particular genre; and in others, it might be so atypical as to be considered a “problematic example” of the genre.