Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Lingua inglese 2: "Syntax", Sintesi del corso di Lingua Inglese

Appunti + integrazione libri + slide per la preparazione dell'esame di Lingua inglese 2; parte relativa alla sintassi della lingua.

Tipologia: Sintesi del corso

2018/2019

Caricato il 11/03/2019

mrtn-pnn
mrtn-pnn 🇮🇹

4.4

(49)

22 documenti

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
SYNTAX
GRAMMARS theories about how language works.
Syntax is different from grammar, but can also be seen as a part of grammar: structural aspect of grammar.
SYNTAX the study of how words combine to form phrases, clauses and sentences.
Two basic principles of syntax:
1) LINEAR ORDER: the ordering of the words in sentences helps to determine:
• whether a sentence is grammatical or not .
• what the sentence mean.
2) HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE: The semantically coherent groups of words within a sentence.
EX. Fluffy is the large black cat in the window.
- the large black cat vs. is the large
- in the window vs. cat in the
Sentences are not simply series of adjacent words → they are made of meaningful groups (or chunks).
Example: Many actors eat at fancy restaurants
There are meaningful groups of words in this sentence
• many actors
• eat at fancy restaurants
They have meanings of their own and each makes a coherent contribution to the meaning of the sentence
as a whole → constituents of this sentence.
Other groups of words do not naturally form meaningful units:
• actors eat at
• eat at fancy
They do not have meanings on their own and are therefore not constituents of the sentence.
Constituent tests
Constituents are meaningful or semantically-coherent groups of words because they can:
can stand alone and make sense question test.
Many actors eat at fancy restaurants. What do many actors do? Eat at fancy restaurants.
be substituted by a pro-form (e.g. pronoun) substitution test.
Many actors eat at fancy restaurants? They eat at fancy restaurants.
• be moved around and still make sense.
With great care, he opened the door / He opened the door with great care.
COSTITUENTS: descriptive phrasal categories. (5 types of phrasal categories in English)
1) NP= (det) (mod) N (qual)
2) VP= (auz) V (compl)
3) PrepP= must have a NP
4) AdjP= are always part of a NP
5) AdvP= the most common consists simply of a lexical adverb
pf3
pf4
pf5

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Lingua inglese 2: "Syntax" e più Sintesi del corso in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

SYNTAX

GRAMMARS → theories about how language works. Syntax is different from grammar, but can also be seen as a part of grammar: structural aspect of grammar. SYNTAX → the study of how words combine to form phrases, clauses and sentences. Two basic principles of syntax:

  1. LINEAR ORDER: the ordering of the words in sentences helps to determine:
  • whether a sentence is grammatical or not.
  • what the sentence mean.
  1. HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE: The semantically coherent groups of words within a sentence. EX. Fluffy is the large black cat in the window.
  • the large black cat vs. is the large
  • in the window vs. cat in the Sentences are not simply series of adjacent words → they are made of meaningful groups (or chunks). Example: “Many actors eat at fancy restaurants” There are meaningful groups of words in this sentence
  • many actors
  • eat at fancy restaurants They have meanings of their own and each makes a coherent contribution to the meaning of the sentence

as a whole → constituents of this sentence.

Other groups of words do not naturally form meaningful units:

  • actors eat at
  • eat at fancy They do not have meanings on their own and are therefore not constituents of the sentence.

Constituent tests

Constituents are meaningful or semantically-coherent groups of words because they can:

- can stand alone and make sense → question test. Many actors eat at fancy restaurants. What do many actors do? → Eat at fancy restaurants.

  • be substituted by a pro-form (e.g. pronoun) → substitution test. Many actors eat at fancy restaurants? They eat at fancy restaurants. - be moved around and still make sense. With great care, he opened the door / He opened the door with great care. COSTITUENTS: descriptive phrasal categories. (5 types of phrasal categories in English)
    1. NP= (det) (mod) N (qual)
    2. VP= (auz) V (compl)
    3. PrepP= must have a NP
    4. AdjP= are always part of a NP
    5. AdvP= the most common consists simply of a lexical adverb

Features of syntactic constituents:

Recursion = the ability to place one constituent inside another one of the same kind → can be used repeatedly in sequence: “The beautifully decorated cake fit with no difficulty into boxes and (into) cartons and (into) paper cups.” Dependency = how phrases are formed is dependent on other nearby phrases → there must be grammatical and semantic matching, or accord.

  1. Grammatical dependency: The plural NP the beautifully decorated cakes requires plural verb form fit in the adjacent VP (not fits or fitting).
  2. Semantic dependency: The verb fit requires a subject NP to be something that can be fitted (e.g. cakes, not happiness).

The aims of syntactic analysis

- to identify sentence constituent boundaries : e.g. The boy was ill → the boy / was / ill

  • to describe the composition of these constituents
  • to understand how these constituents combine together Two approaches:
  • Tree diagrams → NP=noun phrase / VP=verb phrase / AdjP= adjective phrase / AdvP=adverb phrase / PrepP=prepositional phrase.
  • Embedding → how phrases and clauses may fit into each other and into sentence. TREE DIAGRAMS Tree diagrams of complete sentences have 4 levels:
  1. First (top) level → S (sentence)
  2. Second level → phrases (constituents)
  3. Third level → word classes
  4. Fourth (bottom) level → word EMBEDDING: three types of elements - Phrase → a group of words without a subject and a verb: (…) e.g. NP (a friendly dog), PP (in the office) - Clause → a group of related words with a subject and a verb alone: […] e.g., He went home, when I finish, that I like - Sentence → includes one or more clauses: [[…]] e.g. He went home, This is the film that I like, I will call when I finish

• ADJUNCTS

Can be adverbial in form , e.g. adverbs with ly (quickly, softly) or other types of adverbs (yesterday, tomorrow, here, fast), but can also assume other forms (PrepPs, NPs, subordinate clauses). Can be often removed without grammatical damage (optional) → He went to the store (yesterday). Give additional information about the predicate (where, when, why, how) that can be described in various ways:

  • I went to Nottingham. / It appears at the end. ( locative )
  • It happened one night / She arrived two days late. ( temporal )
  • I ate it because I was hungry. ( causal )
  • The book was read by Louise. ( agentive )
  • If I were rich, l’d travel now. ( conditional )
  • Although it was already midnight, I went out. ( concessive )
  • He broke the window with a brick. ( instrumental )

Sentence structure: alternative descriptions

V (Verb) → instead of P (Predicate) O (Object) → C for direct/indirect objects C (Complement) → only for subject complements

NON-PROTOTYPICAL STRUCTURES

The prototypical SVO structure is often modified for emphatic effects.

  • Cleft sentences (It + to be + that/who…) Mike scored the goal. (normal SVO) It was Mike who scored the goal. (not Jim)
  • Pseudo-cleft sentences ( clause introduced by what or all) He opened my letters. (normal SVO) What he did was open my letters. What I want is a good sleep. All I want is a good sleep.
  • Left dislocation → shifting elements to the initial position Robert was his name. (vs. His name was Robert)
  • Inversion → placing the V before the NP subject Never will I accept that decision! (vs. I will never accept that decision)

SENTENCE REALIZATIONS:

DECLARATIVE → Making a statement about something.

NEGATIVE → Denying something

INTERROGATIVE → Asking a question

IMPERATIVE → Giving a command

SUBJUNCTIVE → Point explicitly to unrealised, speculative or doubtful possibilities in the world

EXCLAMATORY → Making an intensive expression or expressing an emotion

FORMING MORE ELABORARATED SENTENCES

1) COORDINATION:

  • Constituents are structured side-by-side.
  • Most common coordinating conjunctions are and, or, but and so , which are used to join similar units of language.
  • Coordinated clauses can stand alone (unlike subordinate clauses). “[[Words are great] and [love is wonderful], but [money pays the rent]]”

2) SUBORDINATION:

Subordinate clauses have their own Subject and Verb, but cannot stand alone. “Even though the broccoli was covered in cheese, Emily refused to eat it.” Subordinating conjunctions: After / although / as / because / before / even if / even though / if / in order that/ once /provided that / rather than / since / so that / than / that / though / unless / until / when / whenever / where whereas / wherever / whether / while / why Punctuation differences in clause positions: Subordinate clausemain clause : separated by a comma Main clausesubordinate clause : no comma TYPES OF SUBORDINATE CLAUSES

RELATIVE CLAUSES:

  • Function as modifiers after a noun , i.e. they tell us more about it
  • Begin with which, that or who (for people) “The man who was fat could barely walk.”

ADVERBIAL CLAUSES:

  • Function as Adjuncts to elaborate condition, time, reason, etc. in relation to the main clause
  • Typically begin with a subordinating conjunction , e.g. if, when, because, while, etc.

COMPLEX SENTENCES:

Consist of one main clause and one or more subordinate clauses inside it. COMPOUND-COMPLEX SENTENCES: Combine subordination and coordination in the sentence

  • “[[Just as he had plucked up the courage [to talk to her], [the train stopped], and [he lost her in the crowd of people]]. ” (one subordinate clause + a compound clause (consisting of 2 simple clauses).

Phraseology

  • Phraseology is a branch of linguistics that studies fixed expressions made up of more than one word : “ready-made” units
  • Phraseology enlarges and enriches vocabulary → most colourful part of a language
  • Like syntax, phraseology is also concerned with syntagmatic relations, e.g. the particular order of words
  • Phraseological Unit (PU) → a word group that
  • has a largely fixed lexical composition and syntactic structure → structural invariability
  • expresses a certain meaning that is more than the combined meaning of each component (more or less idiomatic)
  • Some examples:
    • to get up → phrasal verb
  • to have a look (vs. to look) → “light” verb
  • to have a word with (someone)
  • back-seat driver
  • No word can be changed or added without destroying the sense of the PU.