Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Lexical Metaphor and Transitivity in Language, Appunti di Linguistica Inglese

The document discusses the concept of lexical metaphor, how it is rooted in culture, and its use as a persuasive tool. It also examines the system of transitivity, highlighting how the choice of process types can affect the style and message of a text. The analysis is exemplified through the short story 'Eveline' by James Joyce. Additionally, the document covers the system of modality, dealing with the degrees of possibility, usuality, obligation, and willingness expressed through various linguistic elements. The document provides a comprehensive understanding of these linguistic concepts and their applications in written and spoken language.

Tipologia: Appunti

2020/2021

Caricato il 14/05/2024

unapersonaacasooooo
unapersonaacasooooo 🇮🇹

1 documento

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
5.10.2021
lexical metaphor
metaphor = it’s a device used in poetic imagination, but also a matter of ordinary use of language
it’s pervasive, not just in language but also in thoughts and actions, we do that automatically
we talk about lexical metaphor because it’s observable in language
metalanguage = it’s a language that explains language
resource for interpersonal meaning
when we talk with someone we have 2 options:
1. choosing typical wording, using congruent meaning and expression (literal)
2. metaphorical wording, using less congruent meaning
if we choose one instead of the other the effect is different
example: my lawyer is a shark → I mean that he’s aggressive
the metaphorical expression has some elements of similarity with the literal expression, but also
some elements of difference, it’s thanks to this “clash” that we perceive its being a metaphor
metaphor is deeply rooted in culture → a very old lexical metaphor in the English language is “fall
in love”, attested from 1520s
other example with “fall” are: “fall ill”, “fall prey”, “fall to pieces”
the peculiarity of “fall in love” is that it’s the only one that doesn’t have a negative connotation
so what does this metaphor tell us about “falling in love” in the time of Shakespeare?
love and marriage were different things and at the time falling in love with somebody was a
disgraceful thing, so that metaphor was perceived negatively
some common lexical metaphors in English fall under the concepts of:
life is a journey → “he is lost”, “she will go places”, “don’t let anyone stand in your way”
ideas are food → “a piece of cake”, “food for thought”, “this is my bread and butter”
the systematicity of this lexical metaphors has lead to study conceptual metaphors
→ a study by Charterus-Black found that it’s common for both political parties in the UK to include
the use of terms such as “fight”, “battle”, “threat” to illustrate policies
“war metaphors” were also used a lot during covid-19, where the disease was the enemy we
needed to fight in a war
according to research, the “war frame” can increase people perception of the urgency and
relevance of some situations and problems
Charteris-Black says that metaphors are powerful vehicles of persuasion, and they transfer
meaning from what is easily understood to more complex concepts
8.10.2021
transitivity
the system of transitivity is made up of:
processes → which define what’s going on
participants → they depend on the different processes
circumstances → they are optional and add information like time and place of the process
we can have different realisations of the processes:
material process → it’s the default process and general experience of the outer world
pf3
pf4
pf5

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Lexical Metaphor and Transitivity in Language e più Appunti in PDF di Linguistica Inglese solo su Docsity!

lexical metaphor

metaphor = it’s a device used in poetic imagination, but also a matter of ordinary use of language it’s pervasive, not just in language but also in thoughts and actions, we do that automatically we talk about lexical metaphor because it’s observable in language metalanguage = it’s a language that explains language resource for interpersonal meaning when we talk with someone we have 2 options:

  1. choosing typical wording, using congruent meaning and expression (literal)
  2. metaphorical wording, using less congruent meaning if we choose one instead of the other the effect is different example: my lawyer is a shark → I mean that he’s aggressive the metaphorical expression has some elements of similarity with the literal expression, but also some elements of difference, it’s thanks to this “clash” that we perceive its being a metaphor metaphor is deeply rooted in culture → a very old lexical metaphor in the English language is “fall in love”, attested from 1520s other example with “fall” are: “fall ill”, “fall prey”, “fall to pieces” the peculiarity of “fall in love” is that it’s the only one that doesn’t have a negative connotation so what does this metaphor tell us about “falling in love” in the time of Shakespeare? love and marriage were different things and at the time falling in love with somebody was a disgraceful thing, so that metaphor was perceived negatively some common lexical metaphors in English fall under the concepts of:  life is a journey → “he is lost”, “she will go places”, “don’t let anyone stand in your way”  ideas are food → “a piece of cake”, “food for thought”, “this is my bread and butter” the systematicity of this lexical metaphors has lead to study conceptual metaphors → a study by Charterus-Black found that it’s common for both political parties in the UK to include the use of terms such as “fight”, “battle”, “threat” to illustrate policies “war metaphors” were also used a lot during covid-19, where the disease was the enemy we needed to fight in a war according to research, the “war frame” can increase people perception of the urgency and relevance of some situations and problems Charteris-Black says that metaphors are powerful vehicles of persuasion, and they transfer meaning from what is easily understood to more complex concepts 8.10.

transitivity

the system of transitivity is made up of:  processes → which define what’s going on  participants → they depend on the different processes  circumstances → they are optional and add information like time and place of the process we can have different realisations of the processes:  material process → it’s the default process and general experience of the outer world

the participants are:  actor = is the one performing the action  goal (animate or inanimate) = is what or who is affected by the action  mental process → deals with everything that takes place in out heart, brain and perceptions in general it can project ideas there are 4 subtypes

  1. perceptive
  2. emotive
  3. cognitive
  4. desiderative the participants are:  senser = is the one who feels emotionally or cognitively the action  phenomenon = what is felt, thought or perceived  relational process → it can be divided in:  attributive → X has Y the participants are: a. carrier = the one who carries an attribute b. attribute  identifying → X equals Y the participants are: a. identified b. identifier  verbal process → deals with everything that is spoken, written or uses language it can project locutions the participants are:  sayer = the addresser  target = the addressee  verbiage = the content of what is said  recipient  behavioural process → it comes from inside and manifests outside (ex: cough), it’s not controllable cognitively (ex: dream) and can be a state of being (ex: sit) the only participant is the behaver  existential process → typically “there is” and “there are” the only participant is the existent (12.10.2021) an analysis of transitivity concerns actions in relation to participants and aims at analysing the choice of types of processes and participants involved we are looking at the structure of clauses in all kinds of texts certain process types are better used in certain text types → different processes change how the concept is perceived by the reader  in an instructional text we expect to find mainly material and relational processes, because those instructions have to be clear and easy to follow, they use the imperative form and there are no subordinate clauses because we don’t need them  in a fictional text the predominant process-type is material  while in a romance there are mental processes ex: Pride and Prejudice belongs to the literary genre of the late sentimental novel and presents a predominance of mental processes, because this novel explores the relationship between feeling and rationality and irrationality relational processes are commonly used in scientific discourse, which should be factual and impersonal the choice of different process types affects the style of writing and the message, because if we insert a verbal process followed by a projected clause including an idea we now have a text that reports an opinion, in addition to having a clause complex unlike other possible options 15.10.

ex 2: “he used to call her Poppens” (identifying relational process) he used to call her Poppens initiator/assigner causative identified identifier ex 3: “this voyage made me both a sailor and a merchant” (attributive relational process) this voyage made me both a sailor and a merchant initiator/attributor causative carrier attribute we can express different degrees of agency (= the power that somebody has in that causation), and we distinguish:  high causative → make, force, require  median causative → have, get, oblige  low causative → let, allow, permit I can also exert agency on myself → ex: “I should be almost tempted to say that..”, where I is both the initiator and the 26.10.

system of modality

interpersonal meanings = explore the interaction between people (both written and spoken language) the way we interact depends on and also influences the relationship we have with other people polarity has to do with modality and is the choice between “yes” and “no” finite verbs can be either positive or negative, these are the two poles but there are nuances to that, because there are intermediate degrees like “maybe” = these are known collectively as modal space and concern how modality is brought out modality = is the grammatical system used by speakers and writers to make assessments from the point of view of probability, inclination, usuality there are 3 grammatical resources to express modality:

  1. modal adjuncts
  2. modal operators
  3. multi-word expressions we have 2 main types of modality:
  4. modalization (or epistemic modality) → which relates to the degrees of possibility or usuality
  5. modulation (or deontic modality) → when we express degrees of obligation, inclination or willingness

modal and semi-modal verbs

modal verbs and semi-modal verbs are the most frequent to express modalization or modulation  ex. of probability and usuality: may, might, can, could, should, must  ex. of willingness and obligation: have to, had better, need, may, might, must so there are some verbs that belong to more than one category, it depends on the context  “you must be Miss Hope” → modalization in the degree of possibility because I’m making an assumption  “very well, if I must I must” → modulation in the degree of obligation

modal adjuncts

the most frequent modal adjuncts are:  probably, definitely, maybe, possibly for probability

 generally, usually, often, seldom, never for usuality  willingly, readily for willingness  absolutely, definitely for obligation  yet, still, eventually, soon for temporality  occasionally, generally for typicality  unfortunately, hopefully, in my opinion, frankly, apparently for comment adjuncts

adverbs

there are also adverbs serving as modal adjuncts of intensity, we distinguish them based on their degree and their counterexpectancy the degrees can be:  total → totally, utterly, entirely, completely  high → quite, almost  low → scarcely, hardly the counterexpectancy can be:  exceeding → even, actually, really  limiting → just, simply, only when we analyse modal adjuncts in use we note that most nouns after “utterly” are negative, while most nouns after “entirely” are neutral or positive

multi-words expressions

modalization and modulation can be expressed also through multi-word expressions (periphrasis) they can be nominal groups or verbal groups  ex. of modalization: “it’s usual for”, “it’s likely that”  ex. of modulation: “it’s necessary”, “it’s required that”, “x is supposed to”, “x is willing to” (2.11.2021) modality value concerns the extent to which a writer or a speaker commits himself or herself to the validity of what he or she is writing or saying this value can be:  high → ex: certain (modalization), must (modulation)  median → ex: probable, should  low → ex: possible, may, could