



Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
The document discusses the concept of lexical metaphor, how it is rooted in culture, and its use as a persuasive tool. It also examines the system of transitivity, highlighting how the choice of process types can affect the style and message of a text. The analysis is exemplified through the short story 'Eveline' by James Joyce. Additionally, the document covers the system of modality, dealing with the degrees of possibility, usuality, obligation, and willingness expressed through various linguistic elements. The document provides a comprehensive understanding of these linguistic concepts and their applications in written and spoken language.
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 5
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!




metaphor = it’s a device used in poetic imagination, but also a matter of ordinary use of language it’s pervasive, not just in language but also in thoughts and actions, we do that automatically we talk about lexical metaphor because it’s observable in language metalanguage = it’s a language that explains language resource for interpersonal meaning when we talk with someone we have 2 options:
the system of transitivity is made up of: processes → which define what’s going on participants → they depend on the different processes circumstances → they are optional and add information like time and place of the process we can have different realisations of the processes: material process → it’s the default process and general experience of the outer world
the participants are: actor = is the one performing the action goal (animate or inanimate) = is what or who is affected by the action mental process → deals with everything that takes place in out heart, brain and perceptions in general it can project ideas there are 4 subtypes
ex 2: “he used to call her Poppens” (identifying relational process) he used to call her Poppens initiator/assigner causative identified identifier ex 3: “this voyage made me both a sailor and a merchant” (attributive relational process) this voyage made me both a sailor and a merchant initiator/attributor causative carrier attribute we can express different degrees of agency (= the power that somebody has in that causation), and we distinguish: high causative → make, force, require median causative → have, get, oblige low causative → let, allow, permit I can also exert agency on myself → ex: “I should be almost tempted to say that..”, where I is both the initiator and the 26.10.
interpersonal meanings = explore the interaction between people (both written and spoken language) the way we interact depends on and also influences the relationship we have with other people polarity has to do with modality and is the choice between “yes” and “no” finite verbs can be either positive or negative, these are the two poles but there are nuances to that, because there are intermediate degrees like “maybe” = these are known collectively as modal space and concern how modality is brought out modality = is the grammatical system used by speakers and writers to make assessments from the point of view of probability, inclination, usuality there are 3 grammatical resources to express modality:
modal verbs and semi-modal verbs are the most frequent to express modalization or modulation ex. of probability and usuality: may, might, can, could, should, must ex. of willingness and obligation: have to, had better, need, may, might, must so there are some verbs that belong to more than one category, it depends on the context “you must be Miss Hope” → modalization in the degree of possibility because I’m making an assumption “very well, if I must I must” → modulation in the degree of obligation
the most frequent modal adjuncts are: probably, definitely, maybe, possibly for probability
generally, usually, often, seldom, never for usuality willingly, readily for willingness absolutely, definitely for obligation yet, still, eventually, soon for temporality occasionally, generally for typicality unfortunately, hopefully, in my opinion, frankly, apparently for comment adjuncts
there are also adverbs serving as modal adjuncts of intensity, we distinguish them based on their degree and their counterexpectancy the degrees can be: total → totally, utterly, entirely, completely high → quite, almost low → scarcely, hardly the counterexpectancy can be: exceeding → even, actually, really limiting → just, simply, only when we analyse modal adjuncts in use we note that most nouns after “utterly” are negative, while most nouns after “entirely” are neutral or positive
modalization and modulation can be expressed also through multi-word expressions (periphrasis) they can be nominal groups or verbal groups ex. of modalization: “it’s usual for”, “it’s likely that” ex. of modulation: “it’s necessary”, “it’s required that”, “x is supposed to”, “x is willing to” (2.11.2021) modality value concerns the extent to which a writer or a speaker commits himself or herself to the validity of what he or she is writing or saying this value can be: high → ex: certain (modalization), must (modulation) median → ex: probable, should low → ex: possible, may, could