Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Pragmatics and Discourse: Understanding Language in Context, Appunti di Lingua Inglese

The relationship between language and background features through the approaches of pragmatics and discourse. It covers the study of context, co-textual analysis, function, and speech acts. Pragmatics emphasizes social principles and the importance of context, while discourse analysis focuses on the structure of text. The document also discusses cohesion and relevance, as well as speech act theory and conversational principles.

Tipologia: Appunti

2013/2014

Caricato il 19/12/2014

ary.raimondi.91
ary.raimondi.91 🇮🇹

4.5

(4)

10 documenti

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
Pragmatics and discourse
Are approaches to the study of the relation between languages and background features.
They have in common the study of:
Context: parts of meaning that can be explained by knowledge of the physical and social world. It is the assumption of
knowledge that speaker and hearer share. There are three sort of context:
What speaker know about what they can see around them: situational context
What they know about each other and the world: background context
Cultural: general knowledge that most people carry in their minds;
Interpersonal: knowledge specific and private about the history of the speaker.
What they know about what they have been saying: co-textual context
Discourse and text: the analysis on how stretches of language become meaningful and unified. Discourse analysis calls it
Cohesion (how words relate to each other within the text, referring backwards or forwards to other words in the text); and
pragmatics calls it relevance (the study of how text is hold together meaningfully).
Function: speakers’ purpose in speaking.
They differs in:
Discourse’s emphasis on the structure of text
Importance that pragmatics give to the social principles
Cohesion:
It is an approach to the study of how words relate to each other. It divides to:
Grammatical:
Reference: an act in which a speaker uses linguistic forms to enable the hearer to identify something. Are:
Endophoric: is previous mention of the referent in the text.
Anaphora: link back to something that went before
Cataphora: link forward to something that will be after
Exophoric: There is no previous mention in the preceding text
Substitution: holds text together and avoids repetition
Ellipsis: misses out a piece of text because it is not necessary, avoids repetition
Lexical:
Repetition: repeated words or word phrases
Synonyms: instead of repeating the exact same word a speaker or writer can use another word
Superordinates: general term (like flower instead of rose)
General words: general nouns or verbs that can cover almost everything.
pf3
pf4

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Pragmatics and Discourse: Understanding Language in Context e più Appunti in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

Pragmatics and discourse Are approaches to the study of the relation between languages and background features.

They have in common the study of:

• Context: parts of meaning that can be explained by knowledge of the physical and social world. It is the assumption of

knowledge that speaker and hearer share. There are three sort of context:

• What speaker know about what they can see around them: situational context

• What they know about each other and the world: background context

■ Cultural: general knowledge that most people carry in their minds;

■ Interpersonal: knowledge specific and private about the history of the speaker.

• What they know about what they have been saying: co-textual context

• Discourse and text: the analysis on how stretches of language become meaningful and unified. Discourse analysis calls it

Cohesion (how words relate to each other within the text, referring backwards or forwards to other words in the text); and pragmatics calls it relevance (the study of how text is hold together meaningfully).

• Function: speakers’ purpose in speaking.

They differs in:

• Discourse’s emphasis on the structure of text

• Importance that pragmatics give to the social principles

Cohesion:

It is an approach to the study of how words relate to each other. It divides to:

• Grammatical:

• Reference: an act in which a speaker uses linguistic forms to enable the hearer to identify something. Are:

■ Endophoric: is previous mention of the referent in the text.

• Anaphora: link back to something that went before

• Cataphora: link forward to something that will be after

■ Exophoric: There is no previous mention in the preceding text

• Substitution: holds text together and avoids repetition

• Ellipsis: misses out a piece of text because it is not necessary, avoids repetition

• Lexical:

• Repetition: repeated words or word phrases

• Synonyms: instead of repeating the exact same word a speaker or writer can use another word

• Superordinates: general term (like flower instead of rose)

• General words: general nouns or verbs that can cover almost everything.

Relevance:

Conventional implicature is understood by hearers simply by selecting the relevant features of context and recognizing whatever speakers say as relevant in conversation. When hearers and readers make sense of text they interpret the connection between utterances as meaningful.

The degree of relevance is governed by:

• Contextual effects: include things as adding new information, strengthening or contradicting an existing assumption or

weaking old information.

• Processing effort: the speaker assumes which facts are accessible for the hearer and speaks in such a way that the hearer

can make the correct inferences without too much effort.

Proving relevance is determined by the accessibility of its relevance to the addressee. The explicature of an utterance consists of the propositions that are explicitly communicated.

Speech acts:

The speech acts are the actions performed in saying something. Speech acts theory is the action performed when an utterance is produced, and can be analyzed on three different levels:

1. Locutionary act: (what is said) the form of the words, and the act of saying something

2. Illocutionary force: (what is done in uttering words) the function of the words and the specific purpose that the speaker

have in mind.

3. Perlocutionary effect: is the effect on the hearer with the words uttered

Speech acts are grouped in five macro-classes by Searle:

1. Declarations: Speaker have a certain position within a given institutional framework;

2. Representatives:

3. Commissives:

4. Directives:

5. Expressives:

Speech acts are:

• Direct: speakers want to communicate literal meaning that the words conventionally express [there is a direct relationship

between the form and the function]

• Indirect: a speaker with his words wants to communicate a different meaning from the literal [there is no direct relationship

between and the function]. Indirect speech acts constitute one of the many forms of politeness (thanks for not smoking).

Expressing speech acts vary from country to country. Differences in speech act conventions can cause difficulties cross-culturally.

Limitations of specch acts theory: there is no provision for the messiness of everyday spoken language.

CONVERATION

In conversation each speaker is affected by what they said. Conversation tend to occur in string of related and combined utterances. Two approaches look at the structure of conversation:

• Exchange structure: looks at discourse as predetermined sequence. A ‘structural’ approach attempts to relate discourse

structure to the

✓ Flouting the maxims: maxims are not observed

✓ Violating the maxims: speakers know that the hearer will not know the truth and will only understand the surface meaning

of the words.

POLITENESS:

The choices that are made in language use, the linguistic expressions that give people space and show a friendly attitude to them. To enter into a social relationship we have to show an awareness of the face, that is the public self image of the people that we address. Speakers should respect each others’ expectations regarding self-image and avoid face threatening acts (FTAs). When FTAs are unavoidable we have negative politeness, that respect the hearer’s negative face. When a speakers need to be accepted and liked by the others, they redress FTAs with positive politeness and attends the positive face.

FTA off record ask for help indirectly. (constitutes a flouting of the maxim of quantity and indirect speech acts). Off records allows speaker to make suggestions, requests offers and invitations without addressing them to anyone in particular.

FTA on record ask for something in a direct way. (direct speech act). Directness makes the hearer less reluctant to threaten the speaker’s face. Directness often indicates to be seen as socially close.