


Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
The relationship between language and background features through the approaches of pragmatics and discourse. It covers the study of context, co-textual analysis, function, and speech acts. Pragmatics emphasizes social principles and the importance of context, while discourse analysis focuses on the structure of text. The document also discusses cohesion and relevance, as well as speech act theory and conversational principles.
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 4
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!



Pragmatics and discourse Are approaches to the study of the relation between languages and background features.
They have in common the study of:
knowledge that speaker and hearer share. There are three sort of context:
Cohesion (how words relate to each other within the text, referring backwards or forwards to other words in the text); and pragmatics calls it relevance (the study of how text is hold together meaningfully).
They differs in:
Cohesion:
It is an approach to the study of how words relate to each other. It divides to:
Relevance:
Conventional implicature is understood by hearers simply by selecting the relevant features of context and recognizing whatever speakers say as relevant in conversation. When hearers and readers make sense of text they interpret the connection between utterances as meaningful.
The degree of relevance is governed by:
weaking old information.
can make the correct inferences without too much effort.
Proving relevance is determined by the accessibility of its relevance to the addressee. The explicature of an utterance consists of the propositions that are explicitly communicated.
Speech acts:
The speech acts are the actions performed in saying something. Speech acts theory is the action performed when an utterance is produced, and can be analyzed on three different levels:
have in mind.
Speech acts are grouped in five macro-classes by Searle:
Speech acts are:
between the form and the function]
between and the function]. Indirect speech acts constitute one of the many forms of politeness (thanks for not smoking).
Expressing speech acts vary from country to country. Differences in speech act conventions can cause difficulties cross-culturally.
Limitations of specch acts theory: there is no provision for the messiness of everyday spoken language.
In conversation each speaker is affected by what they said. Conversation tend to occur in string of related and combined utterances. Two approaches look at the structure of conversation:
structure to the
of the words.
POLITENESS:
The choices that are made in language use, the linguistic expressions that give people space and show a friendly attitude to them. To enter into a social relationship we have to show an awareness of the face, that is the public self image of the people that we address. Speakers should respect each others’ expectations regarding self-image and avoid face threatening acts (FTAs). When FTAs are unavoidable we have negative politeness, that respect the hearer’s negative face. When a speakers need to be accepted and liked by the others, they redress FTAs with positive politeness and attends the positive face.
FTA off record ask for help indirectly. (constitutes a flouting of the maxim of quantity and indirect speech acts). Off records allows speaker to make suggestions, requests offers and invitations without addressing them to anyone in particular.
FTA on record ask for something in a direct way. (direct speech act). Directness makes the hearer less reluctant to threaten the speaker’s face. Directness often indicates to be seen as socially close.