

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
saggio vesuvian discourse This study explores the discourse strategies employed by the Vesuvian International Institute for Archaeology and Humanities, particularly in the context of its relationship with the Restoring Ancient Stabiae foundation (RAS) -> an Italian nonprofit organisation established in Washington, in 2002, involving the University of Maryland, the Campania region, the Superintendency for Archaeology of Naples and Pompeii: the RAS is dedicated to promoting the cultural and academic importance of the Vesuvian area, particularly among international universities.
Tipologia: Sintesi del corso
1 / 2
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!


This study explores the discourse strategies employed by the Vesuvian International Institute for Archaeology and Humanities , particularly in the context of its relationship with the Restoring Ancient Stabiae foundation (RAS) -> an Italian nonprofit organisation established in Washington, in 2002, involving the University of Maryland, the Campania region, the Superintendency for Archaeology of Naples and Pompeii: the RAS is dedicated to promoting the cultural and academic importance of the Vesuvian area, particularly among international universities. -> To achieve its mission, RAS has organised important exhibitions, such as “In Stabiano” in 2004, and promoted the creation of a large Archaeological park at the ancient site of Stabiae, to attract more visitors. The Institute sees itself as a part of the movement for responsible tourism. It presents archaeology as a tool for intercultural dialogue, moving away from tourism focused only on profit, and instead supporting environmental and social values.
The Vesuvian Institute’s discourse offers an interesting case for linguistic analysis, looking at both internal and external communication strategies.
The Master plan plays a central role in defining the Institute's institutional identity, as it brings together the voices of various professionals, such as archaeologists, architects, museologists and others, all with a shared vision. Furthermore, the documents highlights the involvement of key institutional partners, such as the Campania region, and the Ministry of Culture. One of its primary goals is to create an archaeological park that not only showcases the remains of Roman villas but also integrates them into a wider cultural and environmental context. So, unlike traditional archaeological sites, the park aims to recreate historical settings through a comparative research, and not just focusing only on the physical remains on site.
- From a linguistic point of view , the master plan mainly uses the present and future tenses to emphasise the project long-term vision. - Modal verbs play an important rhetorical role: in the section “didactic mission”, which outlines the educational objectives, there is a clear strategic use of modality, the verb must appears only once indicating a strong obligation, while should is used more often suggesting recommendations rather than strict commend.
-> this choice suggest a more flexible and inclusive tone, probably due to the evolving nature of the project and the need to accommodate various institutional and cultural stakeholders. A comparison with similar Master plans, such as the Maximo Beach Archaeological site and the Istanbul Historic Peninsula, reveals a significant difference: why those documents frequently use shall to express firm commitments and instructions, the RAS master plan use should. This choice may reflect a strategy of identity management, reflecting the Institute’s complex and pluralistic nature. Lastly, the Plan also gives great importance to public involvement, explicitly aiming to involve local schools and the community of Castellamare, presenting archaeology not just as a scientific project, but as a medium of intercultural dialogue - in doing so, the master plan defines cultural heritage as a shared global responsibility.
The external communication analysis focuses on print and online materials related to the 2004 In Stabiano exhibition. The Exhibition was presented as a philanthropic initiative aimed at cultural preservation and international educational exchange, emphasising its benefits both for Italy and the United States. However, from an American perspective , the exhibition was portrayed as a mutually beneficial arrangement - so, helping Italy to protect its cultural heritage, while enriching American cultural life. But, from the Italian perspective , the project took a more commercial tone, with a strong focus on fundraising. The In Stabiano brochure explicitly mention RAS efforts to supplement Italian public funds. This dual perspective illustrates how RAS adapted its discourse based on the target audience.