Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Saggio Vesuvian Discourse, Sintesi del corso di Lingua Inglese

saggio vesuvian discourse This study explores the discourse strategies employed by the Vesuvian International Institute for Archaeology and Humanities, particularly in the context of its relationship with the Restoring Ancient Stabiae foundation (RAS) -> an Italian nonprofit organisation established in Washington, in 2002, involving the University of Maryland, the Campania region, the Superintendency for Archaeology of Naples and Pompeii: the RAS is dedicated to promoting the cultural and academic importance of the Vesuvian area, particularly among international universities.

Tipologia: Sintesi del corso

2025/2026

Caricato il 30/06/2026

camilladerrico04
camilladerrico04 🇮🇹

3 documenti

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
Introduction
This study explores the discourse strategies employed by the Vesuvian International Institute for
Archaeology and Humanities, particularly in the context of its relationship with the Restoring
Ancient Stabiae foundation (RAS) -> an Italian nonprofit organisation established in Washington,
in 2002, involving the University of Maryland, the Campania region, the Superintendency for
Archaeology of Naples and Pompeii: the RAS is dedicated to promoting the cultural and academic
importance of the Vesuvian area, particularly among international universities.
-> To achieve its mission, RAS has organised important exhibitions, such as “In Stabiano” in 2004,
and promoted the creation of a large Archaeological park at the ancient site of Stabiae, to attract
more visitors.
The Institute sees itself as a part of the movement for responsible tourism. It presents archaeology
as a tool for intercultural dialogue, moving away from tourism focused only on profit, and instead
supporting environmental and social values.
Analysis
The Vesuvian Institute’s discourse offers an interesting case for linguistic analysis, looking at both
internal and external communication strategies.
Internal communication: the RAS master plan, which outlines the foundation’s vision, structure
and goals.
External communication: Promotional materials such as the In Stabiano exhibition brochure, the
general tourism brochure, and the Institute’s official website.
By analysing this texts, the study aims to identify and understand the rhetorical and linguistic
strategies used to build an institutional identity that brings together academic, cultural and economic
aims of its stakeholders.
Internal communication
The Master plan plays a central role in defining the Institute's institutional identity, as it brings
together the voices of various professionals, such as archaeologists, architects, museologists and
others, all with a shared vision. Furthermore, the documents highlights the involvement of key
institutional partners, such as the Campania region, and the Ministry of Culture.
One of its primary goals is to create an archaeological park that not only showcases the remains of
Roman villas but also integrates them into a wider cultural and environmental context. So, unlike
traditional archaeological sites, the park aims to recreate historical settings through a comparative
research, and not just focusing only on the physical remains on site.
From a linguistic point of view, the master plan mainly uses the present and future tenses to
emphasise the project long-term vision.
Modal verbs play an important rhetorical role: in the section “didactic mission”, which outlines
the educational objectives, there is a clear strategic use of modality, the verb must appears only
once indicating a strong obligation, while should is used more often suggesting recommendations
rather than strict commend.
pf2

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Saggio Vesuvian Discourse e più Sintesi del corso in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

Introduction

This study explores the discourse strategies employed by the Vesuvian International Institute for Archaeology and Humanities , particularly in the context of its relationship with the Restoring Ancient Stabiae foundation (RAS) -> an Italian nonprofit organisation established in Washington, in 2002, involving the University of Maryland, the Campania region, the Superintendency for Archaeology of Naples and Pompeii: the RAS is dedicated to promoting the cultural and academic importance of the Vesuvian area, particularly among international universities. -> To achieve its mission, RAS has organised important exhibitions, such as “In Stabiano” in 2004, and promoted the creation of a large Archaeological park at the ancient site of Stabiae, to attract more visitors. The Institute sees itself as a part of the movement for responsible tourism. It presents archaeology as a tool for intercultural dialogue, moving away from tourism focused only on profit, and instead supporting environmental and social values.

Analysis

The Vesuvian Institute’s discourse offers an interesting case for linguistic analysis, looking at both internal and external communication strategies.

  • Internal communication : the RAS master plan, which outlines the foundation’s vision, structure and goals.
  • External communication : Promotional materials such as the In Stabiano exhibition brochure, the general tourism brochure, and the Institute’s official website. By analysing this texts, the study aims to identify and understand the rhetorical and linguistic strategies used to build an institutional identity that brings together academic, cultural and economic aims of its stakeholders.

Internal communication

The Master plan plays a central role in defining the Institute's institutional identity, as it brings together the voices of various professionals, such as archaeologists, architects, museologists and others, all with a shared vision. Furthermore, the documents highlights the involvement of key institutional partners, such as the Campania region, and the Ministry of Culture. One of its primary goals is to create an archaeological park that not only showcases the remains of Roman villas but also integrates them into a wider cultural and environmental context. So, unlike traditional archaeological sites, the park aims to recreate historical settings through a comparative research, and not just focusing only on the physical remains on site.

- From a linguistic point of view , the master plan mainly uses the present and future tenses to emphasise the project long-term vision. - Modal verbs play an important rhetorical role: in the section “didactic mission”, which outlines the educational objectives, there is a clear strategic use of modality, the verb must appears only once indicating a strong obligation, while should is used more often suggesting recommendations rather than strict commend.

-> this choice suggest a more flexible and inclusive tone, probably due to the evolving nature of the project and the need to accommodate various institutional and cultural stakeholders. A comparison with similar Master plans, such as the Maximo Beach Archaeological site and the Istanbul Historic Peninsula, reveals a significant difference: why those documents frequently use shall to express firm commitments and instructions, the RAS master plan use should. This choice may reflect a strategy of identity management, reflecting the Institute’s complex and pluralistic nature. Lastly, the Plan also gives great importance to public involvement, explicitly aiming to involve local schools and the community of Castellamare, presenting archaeology not just as a scientific project, but as a medium of intercultural dialogue - in doing so, the master plan defines cultural heritage as a shared global responsibility.

External communication

The external communication analysis focuses on print and online materials related to the 2004 In Stabiano exhibition. The Exhibition was presented as a philanthropic initiative aimed at cultural preservation and international educational exchange, emphasising its benefits both for Italy and the United States. However, from an American perspective , the exhibition was portrayed as a mutually beneficial arrangement - so, helping Italy to protect its cultural heritage, while enriching American cultural life. But, from the Italian perspective , the project took a more commercial tone, with a strong focus on fundraising. The In Stabiano brochure explicitly mention RAS efforts to supplement Italian public funds. This dual perspective illustrates how RAS adapted its discourse based on the target audience.

  • From a linguistic point of view one strategy employed was the use of the third-person singular pronoun probably to distance the organisation from direct financial responsibility. English and Italian versions revealed significant differences:
  • Italian materials emphasised cultural connection by using inclusive expressions like “our culture”; While English version adopted a more distanced version such as, “local culture”.
  • In translation, some commercial element were mede less explicit, such as “tourism\cultural initiatives” became “excursions”. A key critique of RAS’s external communication is the growing commodification of Italian cultural identity. While brochures promoted scientific discovery and cultural aspects, online materials pictured the Vesuvian Institute more as a tourist attraction. This shift is reinforced by statements from RAS-associated personnel, such as a tour guide who compared Ancient Stabiae to Palm Beach—reducing a site of such archaeological value to a symbol of elite vacation. Such rhetoric illustrates how institutional messaging can contribute to the semiotic construction of a “Little Italy in Italy,” where history and authenticity are pushed aside by market appeal.