Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Lexicology: The Study of Words and Their Meaning, Appunti di Linguistica Inglese

Lexicology is the branch of linguistics that deals with the study of words, their meanings, and their formation. the concept of lexicology, discussing the importance of morphemes, free and bound morphemes, simple and complex words, and the processes of inflection, derivation, and compounding. It also covers the impact of colonial expansion on the English language and the different types of derivational affixes.

Tipologia: Appunti

2019/2020

Caricato il 17/10/2022

valentina.scalarone
valentina.scalarone 🇮🇹

4 documenti

1 / 23

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
JACKSON
Chapter 1) What is lexicology?
Lexicology may be defined as the study of lexis, understood as the stock of words in a given
language, i.e. its vocabulary or lexicon (from Greek lexis/word, lexikos/of-for words)
The notion of ‘word’ is central to lexicology: ‘word’ needs to be defined and discussed as a
technical term (ch. 3)
We use ‘word’ somewhat loosely, in the usual traditional sense of ‘a sequence of letters’.
A comparison of the words vocabulary, lexis and lexicon would show that the three items
may be considered more or less synonymous. However, vocabulary=more colloquial,
lexicon=more learned and technical, lexis=half-way between the two.
Dictionary: different from vocabulary, lexis and lexicon. Lexicology must not be confused
with lexicography, the writing or compilation of dictionaries, which is a special technique
rather than a level of language study.
Lexicology deals with simple words, compounds, and complex words: meaningful units of
language, semantics.
Lexicology relies on information derived from morphology: the study of the form of words
and their components.
Etymology: the study of the origins of words.
MORPHOLOGY
Morphology is the study of morphemes and their arrangements in forming words.
Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units which may constitute words or parts of
words: they are ‘smallest’ or ‘minimal’ in the sense that they cannot be broken down
further on the basis of meaning.
Examples:
- cat, child, with: cannot be analysed further into meaningful units
- sleeping, armchairs, farmer: can be analysed as: Sleep + ing/ Arm + chair + s/ Farm + er
-Some are simple words (cat, child, with, sleep, arm, farm), others are parts of words (-ing,
-s,-er)
Morphemes that can occur alone as individual words are free morphemes. Those that can
occur only with another morpheme are bound morphemes.
(Morphs should not be confused with syllables. The basic difference between the two is
that while morphs are manifestations of morphemes and represent a specific meaning,
syllables are parts of words which are isolated only on the basis of pronunciation.)
Any concrete realisation of a morpheme in a given utterance is called a ‘morph’ (cat, chair,
farm, -ing, -s, and –er are all morphs): Two or more morphs may vary a little but still have
the same meaning: ex. a/an, depending on the following sound.
Morphs which are the different representations of the same morpheme are referred to as
allomorphs.
Simple words: are all free morphemes (door, knob, wild)
complex words: are formed from simpler words by the addition of affixes or some other
kind of morphological modification (spoonful, mentally, farmer)
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Lexicology: The Study of Words and Their Meaning e più Appunti in PDF di Linguistica Inglese solo su Docsity!

JACKSON

Chapter 1) What is lexicology?

 Lexicology may be defined as the study of lexis, understood as the stock of words in a given language, i.e. its vocabulary or lexicon (from Greek lexis/word, lexikos/of-for words)  The notion of ‘word’ is central to lexicology: ‘word’ needs to be defined and discussed as a technical term (ch. 3)  We use ‘ word ’ somewhat loosely, in the usual traditional sense of ‘a sequence of letters’.  A comparison of the words vocabulary, lexis and lexicon would show that the three items may be considered more or less synonymous. However, vocabulary=more colloquial, lexicon=more learned and technical, lexis=half-way between the two.  Dictionary: different from vocabulary, lexis and lexicon. Lexicology must not be confused with lexicography, the writing or compilation of dictionaries, which is a special technique rather than a level of language study.  Lexicology deals with simple words, compounds, and complex words: meaningful units of language, semantics.  Lexicology relies on information derived from morphology: the study of the form of words and their components.  Etymology : the study of the origins of words. MORPHOLOGY  Morphology is the study of morphemes and their arrangements in forming words.  Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units which may constitute words or parts of words: they are ‘smallest’ or ‘minimal’ in the sense that they cannot be broken down further on the basis of meaning.  Examples:

  • cat, child, with: cannot be analysed further into meaningful units
  • sleeping, armchairs, farmer: can be analysed as: Sleep + ing/ Arm + chair + s/ Farm + er -Some are simple words (cat, child, with, sleep, arm, farm), others are parts of words (-ing, -s,-er)  Morphemes that can occur alone as individual words are free morphemes. Those that can occur only with another morpheme are bound morphemes.  (Morphs should not be confused with syllables. The basic difference between the two is that while morphs are manifestations of morphemes and represent a specific meaning, syllables are parts of words which are isolated only on the basis of pronunciation.)  Any concrete realisation of a morpheme in a given utterance is called a ‘morph’ (cat, chair, farm, -ing, -s, and –er are all morphs): Two or more morphs may vary a little but still have the same meaning: ex. a/an, depending on the following sound.  Morphs which are the different representations of the same morpheme are referred to as allomorphs.  Simple words: are all free morphemes (door, knob, wild)  complex words: are formed from simpler words by the addition of affixes or some other kind of morphological modification (spoonful, mentally, farmer)

 compound words or simply compounds: are formed by combining two or more words (free morphemes) with or without morphological modification (cheeseburger, pound saver). SEMANTICS  Semantics is generally defined as the study of meaning, in order to explain and describe meaning in natural languages. There are several kinds of semantics:

  1. Pragmatic semantics (meaning of utterances in context)
  2. Sentence semantics (meaning of sentences as well as meaning relations between sentences)
  3. Lexical semantics (meaning of words and the meaning relations that are internal to the vocabulary of a language) Semantic is usually approached from one of two perspectives: philosophical or linguistic.  Linguistic semantics:
  4. it involves all aspects of human language
  5. not only as a division of lexicology, but also as a part of phonology, syntax, textlinguistics, discourse, and pragmatics.
  6. (It will also be useful to introduce two terms which belong more to the area of sentence semantics, but which are equally relevant to our discussion of lexicology: “meaningfulness” and “acceptability”.) ETYMOLOGY  Etymology is the study of the whole history of words, not just of their origin.  (One of the difficulties faced by etymological studies is that some words are not etymologically related to ancient forms; consequently, the forms from which such words are said to derive can only be produced by analogy.)  Etymological information goes beyond the origin of the word. It also makes reference to cognates (i.e. words related in form) in other languages.  In the case of borrowed words, it gives the source language, together with the date when the borrowing took place.  It supplies any other information on the previous history of the word. In dictionaries, etymology is traditionally placed between square brackets LEXICOGRAPHY  Lexicography is a special technique for the writing and compilation of dictionaries.  This definition may be considered rather restrictive, since lexicography may also refer to the principles that underlie the process of compiling and editing dictionaries. Some of those principles are clearly lexical or lexicological in nature, while others stem from the specific domain of book production and marketing.  Lexicographical compilation may be considered as derived from lexicological theory: in this sense it may be regarded as ‘applied lexicology’.  Initially, lexicography developed its own principles and tradition independently of linguistics in general; but this is no longer the case.  Lexicology, morphology, syntax, and phonology provide an input to lexicography. And sociolinguistics contributes not only in the study and selection of the language variety to be used in the dictionary, but also in the inclusion of information on style and registers.

government. These bore names such as Doncaster, Gloucester, Lancaster, and Worcester – all derived in part for the Latin word castra , ‘camp’. OLD ENGLISH PERIOD (450-1066)  The first Old English manuscripts were simply a few scattered inscriptions written around the fifth and sixth centuries in the runic alphabet brought by the Anglo-Saxons, that give very little information on the language.  It is generally acknowledged that most OE texts were written in the period following the reign of King Alfred (849-899), who arranged for the many Latin works to be translated.  (the OE alphabet was very similar to the one still use today, but the absence of capital letters was a distinctive feature and also some modern letters were absent like “j, v, f, q, x, z”. the numbers were written only in Roman symbols).  While the majority of words in prose are very close to Modern English, words in poetic texts are different.  OE relied on word-formation processes based on native elements (loanwords/borrowings were limited in number). (the latter period of OE was characterized by the introduction of a number of “loan translation”).  Grammatical relationships were expressed mainly by the use of inflectional endings, rather than word order. MIDDLE ENGLISH PERIOD (1066-1500)  The Middle English period has a much greater documentation: marked increase of private and public documents.  Material in English began to appear in the 13th century, and during the 14th century there was a marked increase in the number of translated writings from Latin and French, and of texts for teaching these languages.  The diversity in spelling was far greater than that found in OE texts: these depends on a combination of historical, linguistic, and social factors.  As the period progressed, so the spelling changed to approximate those of Modern English.  ME is characterised by intensive and extensive borrowing from other languages. In particular, the Norman Conquest of 1066, which introduced French-English bilingualism into England; paved the way (aperto la strada) for a massive borrowing of French words into the English vocabulary.  The process of word formation was still dynamic, and relevant (compunding and affixation) EARLY and LATE MODERN ENGLISH (1500-1800) 01  The transition from Middle English to Early Modern English is characterised by the printing revolution, as a determining factor: in 1476 the printing press was introduced in England by William Caxton.  Printing played a major role in fostering the norms of spelling and pronunciation, in providing more opportunities for people to write, and in giving published works much wider circulation; as a result, more books were published.  The period encompassed the Renaissance, which runs from the middle of the fifteenth century until around1650: renewed interest in the classical languages and literatures, and

by major developments in the sciences and arts. The Protestant Reformation had a major role in the spreading of the vernacular.  Colonial expansion and colonial settlements: words came into English from North America, Asia, and Africa. Some came directly, others via some European languages.  Writers began to borrow from other European languages to express the new concepts, techniques and inventions that first came from Europe.  Thousands of Latin and Greek words were introduced, as translators of texts from these languages could not find precise equivalents in English (e.g. scientific and technical terminology, etc.)  ALL THESE FACTORS HAD A MAJOR IMPACT ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, ESPECIALLY ON ITS VOCABULARY EARLY and LATE MODERN ENGLISH (1500-1800) 02  The two most important influences on the development of the English language during the last decades of the Renaissance are the works of William Shakespeare (1564-1616) and the King James Bible (1611). The Bible was appointed to be read in churches throughout the kingdom.  This period witnessed the fastest lexical growth in the history of the language: massive borrowing and the application of different types of word formation using native sources; many semantic changes (e.g. old words acquired new meanings).  It was felt the necessity to ‘stabilise’ the language: debate on ‘language corruption’ (dictionaries and grammars), the importance of dictionaries had been felt long before the debate on language corruption:

  • Cawdrey, 1604, A Table Alphabeticall: first “dictionary of hard words”. -Bailey, 1721, Universal Etymological English Dictionary -Johnson, 1755, Dictionary of the English Language LATE MODERN ENGLISH (circa 1750-1900)  Many of the words used today had a different meaning in the eighteenth-century, it would be very difficult to say exactly when the change in meaning occurred.  Modern English may be characterised by three main features: -Unprecedented growth of scientific vocabulary -The assertion of American English as a dominant variety of the language (leading economic power; more especially at the lexical level) -The emergence of other varieties known as ‘New Englishes’  (Strong linguistic influences of American English is felt directly in the areas of pronunciation and grammar but more especially at the lexical level.)  (the concept of “new Englishes”, that have origin in the colonial era, refers to new varieties of the language that have become localized not only through the influence of the other languages of the regions where they are used, but also through being adapted to the life and culture of their speakers.) Native English vocabulary  Native English vocabulary is made up of Anglo-Saxon words with some influences of Celtic.

Inflection is a general grammatical process which combines words and affixes (always suffixes in English) to produce alternative grammatical forms of words -They may be described as ‘relational markers’ that fit words for use in syntax: one the inflection or relational marker is added to a stem, that stem does not change class (dog > dog-s; John > John’s book; etc.) -They are used to form paradigms: the alternatives listed in each paradigm are mutually exclusive in the sense that where one occurs the other one does not occur (i.e. complementary distribution)  Derivation is a lexical process which actually forms a new word out of an existing one by the addition of a derivational affix -English has over sixty common derivational affixes, and there is no theoretical limit to their number. -Derivational affixes can change the word class of the item they are added to and establish words as members of the various word classes

  • They are inner with respect to inflections, so that if derivations and inflections co-occur, derivations are closer to the stem: speak-er-s. Types of derivational affixes  Class-changing -Change the word class of the word to which they are added (resign vs. resign-ation) once added to a stem, form a derivative which is automatically marked by that affix as noun, verb, adjective or adverb -The derivations are said to determine or govern the word class of the stem: ‘Nominalizers’: noun derivational affixes/ ‘Verbalizers’: verb derivational affixes/ ‘Adjectivizers’/ ‘Adverbializers’  Class-maintaining [or class-preserving] -Do not change the word class of the word but change the meaning of the derivative (i.e. the word which results from the derivation) (child vs child-hood) -English class maintaining derivations are mainly prefixes (noun, verb, adjective patterns: English adverbs are not used to derive words of other classes so we cannot speak of English adverbs patterns). Compounds  They may be defined as stems consisting of more than one root (Bedside, black market, car-wash, waste paper basket, etc.)  The orthographic treatment of compounds is by no means consistent: some are written as one word, with or without hyphen between two roots; while others are written as two or more separate words (check ‘advisory’, in the OED, etc.)  Compounds may be distinguished from phrases on phonological, syntactic, and semantic grounds
  1. Words are characterised by a single primary stress: so that compound are often recognised by stress pattern: ‘black ‘board vs. ‘black-board, ‘black ‘bird vs. ‘black bird, etc.
  1. All compounds are non-interruptible in the sense that in normal use their constituent parts are not interrupted by extraneous elements which confirms the assumption that compounds are indeed single lexical units
  2. Modification refers to the use of other words to modify the meaning of a compound: its constituent elements cannot be modified independently; however the compound as a whole may indeed be modified by other words.
  3. Inflectibility refers to the use of inflections to modify the grammatical function of compounds. The compound may be inflected according to its grammatical class, however its constituent elements may not be inflected.
  4. Compounds are characterised semantically by the fact that they tend to acquire specialised meanings Parts of a compounds Compounds consisting of two roots are the simplest type of compound, they are the most Numerous in the language.
  5. Nouns as initial elements: air, book, hair, etc.
  6. Verbs as initial elements: break, count, etc.
  7. Adjectives as initial elements: black, fair, green, etc.
  8. Adverbs as initial elements: by, fore, out, etc.
  9. Neo-classical compounds: combination of two bound root morphemes, ex. astronaut, bibliography, xenophobia. They are formed from Greek and Latin roots which do not occur as single words in English, and whose combinations are not generally compounds in classical Greek and Latin. They are learned vocabulary and form much of the international vocabulary of science, medicine and technology Classification of compounds
  • Noun compounds: the second root MUST be a noun. N+N (ash-tray), V+N (pick-pocket), Adj+N (blue-collar), Av+N (after-thought)
  • Verb compounds: the second root MUST be a verb. N+V (baby-sit), V+V (dive-bomb), Adj+ V (dry- clean), Av+V (down-grade)
  • Adjective compounds: the second root MUST be an adjective. N+Adj (sea-sick), Adj+Adj (blue- green), Av+Adj (near-sighed)
  • Adverb compounds: Av+Av (through-out) Syntactic compounds
  • Endocentric: one or both roots is the head of the compound (meaning ‘internal’ to the roots) -co-ordinate: two head roots (boyfriend, a boy who is a friend and vice versa) -sub-ordinate: only one head root (armchair, a chair with arms)
  • Exocentric: neither root is the head (meaning ‘external’ to the roots). Pick-pocket, i.e. one who picks pockets.

Chapter 3) The notion of word

 The term “word” is used to designate an intermediate structure smaller than a whole phrase and yet generally larger than a single sound segment. The word may be defined differently depending on whether we focus on its representation.

  1. The first type of definition relies mainly on writing traditions that separate by spaces sequences of letters or characters.
  2. The second type considers the invisible unit thought as the most essential criterion.
  3. The third type stems neither from writing traditions nor from thought units and relies only on purely formal criteria.  (Bloomfield) contrasted the word with other significant units: the morpheme or minimal meaningful unit and the syntagme or structure, consisting potentially of more than one word. For him a minimal form is a morpheme.  A word is viewed as a form which can occur in isolation and have meaning but which cannot be analysed into elements which can all occur alone and also have meaning.  Word defined : we shall consider the word as an uninterruptible unit of structure consisting of one or more morphemes and which typically occurs in the structure of phrases. The morphemes are the ultimate grammatical constituents, the minimal meaningful units of language.  Lexical words: nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives. They have independent meanings and be meaningful even in isolation or in a series.  Grammatical words: elements like prepositions, articles, conjunctions; they constitute closed classes.  Characteristics of words :
    1. The word is an uninterruptible unit. When elements are added to a word to modify its meaning, they are never included within that word. They are added either at the beginning as prefixes of the word or at the end as suffixes. The word to which affixes are added and which carries the basic meaning of the resulting complex word is known as the “stem”, which may consist of one or more morphemes. The label “root” is used to refer to a stem consisting of a single morpheme.
    2. The word may consist of one or more morphemes. When it consists of one morpheme only, then it cannot be broken down into smaller meaningful units (dog, hand, man, out). This are called “simple words” (minimum free forms). When words consist of more than one morpheme, they may be either complex or compound. Complex words may be broken down into one free form and one or more bound forms (dog-s; happi-ly ) whereas compound words consist of more than one free form (birth+day; black+bird)
    3. The word occurs typically in the structure phrases.
    4. It is also an important characteristic of each word that it should belong to a specific word class or part of speech.  Ambiguity in the notion of word:

Word meaning  The linguistic sign: is a mental unit consisting of two faces which cannot be separated: a concept and an acoustic image.  Denotation and reference: “lexeme” is considered an abstract linguistic unit with different variants. Thus the relation of denotation holds between a lexeme and a whole class of extra-linguistic objects. As opposed to denotation, the relationship of reference holds between an expression and what the expression stands for an particular occasions of its utterance. It is a property only of expressions.  Denotation and sense: sense is a relationship which is internal to the language system. Both individual lexemes and larger expression have sense. However, the sense of an expression in a function of the sense of the lexemes it contains and their occurrences in a particular grammatical construction. A comparison between denotation and sense shows that the two relations are dependent on each other.  Denotation and connotation: connotation is closely associated with synonymy so synonyms may have the same denotation but differ in connotation. Connotations constitute additional properties of lexemes. Polysemy  Situation where the same word has two or more different meanings (ex. The noun “board”). In most case only one of the meanings of a polysemous word will fit into a given context, but occasionally ambiguity may also arise. Homonymy  Refers to a situation where we have two or more words with the same shape; they are considered distinct lexemes mainly because they have unrelated meanings and different etymologies. Multiword lexemes  Lexeme or lexical item: unit of lexical meaning which exsists regardless of any inflectional endings it may have or the number of word it may contain. A lexeme may consist of one word (ex. Boy; break) but it may also contain more than one word (ex. Away from; in front of). Multiword verbs  The main verb and one or two particles can be analysed as constituents of a single unit.

1. Prepositional: always followed by an object (they are all transitive) that cannot occur between the particle and the main verb. 2. Phrasal: may be followed by an object, they may be either transitive or intransitive. 3. Phrasal-prepositional: are transitive, they have two particles, transitivity is not used as a distinctive feature for this sub-group.  Idioms: the meaning of a idiom cannot be predicted from the meaning of its constituents we may also consider idioms as a type of multiword lexeme. An idiom may be defined as a phrase the meaning of which cannot be predicted from the individual meanings of the morphemes it comprises. Idioms may be characterized by several features but they may be summarized under two main headings: ambiguity and syntactic peculiarities.

Semantic components Components can coexist as part of the word’s meaning potential:

  • A component may be present but not active
  • Different aspects of word meaning are activated in different contexts What, then, is a word meaning? Meanings are EVENTS not ENTITIES «The meanings of words in a dictionary» are MEANING POTENTIALS, that is Potential contributions to the meanings of texts and conversations in which the words are used, and activated by the speaker who uses them.

Strict vs. Loose Synonymy Two words that are synonyms would have to be interchangeable in all their possible contexts of use but

  1. such a strict synonymy does not exist or if it does,
  2. it exists only as semantic change is taking place: where, historically, two words have been in danger of becoming strict synonyms, one of them has either changed its meaning in some way or fallen out of use. When we speak of synonymy, we mean varying degrees of ‘loose’ synonymy, that is varying degrees of sameness: Synonyms may overlap in meaning to a greater or lesser degree, though it is not clear how this might be measured, nor whether there is a limit at which the notion of synonymy becomes

 the examples given in the previous slides represent THE IDEAL there are many, many words for which no precise genus expression exists.  HYPONYMY hierarchies are not necessarily either complete or neatly arranged however, our vocabulary presumably contains the words that we need in order to communicate. Meronymy  It is a ‘part of’ relation. It can be represented by a hierarchy of superordinate and subordinate terms (MERONYM > subordinate). It is a part/whole relation which mostly applies to entities that have concrete reference. However, we also divide more abstract entities into their parts.  Meronymy reflects the relationship of the part to the whole, and vice versa. X is a meronym of Y, when you can say:

  1. X and the other parts of a Y
  2. the parts of a Y include the Xs  The role of meronyms in dictionary definitions is pretty constant:
  3. it’s difficult to define the part without mentioning the whole
  4. on the other hand, the part is only occasionally referred to in the definition of the whole  Quasi-meronymy reflects the relationship of the member to the group or class of people, or collection of objects. Pairs of quasi-meronyms are less likely than meronyms to appear in their partners’ definitions, but this does occur. Regular polysemy  Some polysemous words have a particular relationship with others in their lexical set: LEXICAL SET > this expression denotes a group of words similar in meaning that belong to the same wordclass; for instance, the days of the week form a lexical set, as do names of liquids, motion verbs, colour terms, etc.  in that several of their meanings seem to parallel each other: Certain specific semantic components result in sets of words behaving lexicographically in a very similar way > THIS IS KNOWN AS REGULAR POLYSEMY  The semantic component CONTAINER (hence the lexical unit ‘container’ in the dictionary entries) in can and glass results in each of these words having parallel sets of lexical units:
  5. the object itself
  6. its contents  Such inter-word relationships are of immediate interest to lexicographers: Once you have worked out the entry for can when you come to glass you can use the shared lexical units in the can-entry as a model. English morphology encourages a wide range of regular polysemy than is found in other languages that have specific forms for verbs and nouns, and so we can include under ‘regular polysemy’ any combination of word-classes.  Regular polysemy describes the phenomenon where all the members of a particular semantic set behave in predictably similar ways.  This systematicity presents risks and opportunitiesin consistently similar ways, and the opportunity of streamlining the editorial process.  Regular polysemy is seen as one aspect of ‘the search for systematicity in the lexicon’ It is a way to ‘map’ the lexicon (Ex., look for: can, glass, cup, bowl, packet, bottle, box, etc. [container])

Antonymy  (or oppositeness of meaning) is probably the most intensively researched of the sense relations, and various classifications and terminological proposals compete with one another.  Antonymy is a semantic relation so it may hold between words that belong to different word classes.  A basic distinction opposes:

  1. binary gradable (or just binary). They do not represent an either/or relation but rather a more/less relation (beautiful-ugly/ fast-slow)
  2. binary non-gradable (or non-binary because of a scale between the two opposite ends): these pairs of antonyms are in an either/or relation of oppositeness (asleep-awake/ dead- alive)
  3. multiple antonyms within each of these classes, further types may be distinguished. Oppositeness  Oppositeness has an important role in structuring the vocabulary of English: -this is specially so in the ADJECTIVE WORD CLASS: long-short, wide-narrow, new-old, etc.  English can also express oppositeness by means of prefixes and suffixes (antonyms morphologically related): -dis-, un-, in-, -ful, -less > useful-useless, thoughtful-thoughtless, etc.  However, words such as hopeful-hopeless are not opposites,
  4. the first means optimistic/promising
  5. the latter not successful/bad/terrible  Other word-forms have no counterpart: grateful vs. *grateless / selfless vs. *selfful  Grateful >thankful, favourable, pleased ≠ ungrateful, careless, ingrate, thankless, etc.  Selfless > altruistic, unselfish ≠ egoistic, egoistical, selfish, egocentric, self-centered, self- centred, selfabsorbed, self-involved Types of oppositeness: gradable antonyms  There are different types of oppositeness of meaning:
  6. Gradable antonyms: beautiful-ugly, expensive-cheap, fast-slow, hot-cold, long-short, sweet-sour, wide-narrow, etc. These pairs are called ‘gradable’ because they represent a more/less relation ≠ either/or relation:
  7. between the two end-points there is a gradable continuum.
  8. one is usually a marked term/global member > How long is the street?
  9. comparative and superlative
  10. modified by adverbials (very, extremely, etc.) Polar “antonymy”  This relationship is similar to, but more complex than, complementarity. (If X then not Y, and if Y then not X).  There is a gradient between X and Y in polar antonymy: X and Y are the poles of this gradient (but in between there is an indeterminate area) more X vs. less Y are found
  1. Multiple opposition-cycles: in ‘cycles’ such as the days of the week or the months of the year, there is again only a single conceptual dimension (ex. TIME), but the dimension does not have a polar structure (in the sense hat there are two extremes such as hot- cold). Polysemy Focus: How lexical items/words can be divided into different meanings (How lexicographers make decisions on meaning sub-division (lumping vs. splitting) According to Stock: exicographers should consider the superordinates of each of the meanings of the lexical item (the appropriate genus word)
  2. Where meanings require distinct genus words they are ipso facto differentsenses (or distinct genus words/superodinates suggest distinct senses)
  3. The second move is to disambiguate those meanings which have the same genus word / superordinate Disambiguation The lexicographer considers the various differentiae that will be required (in a definition) to distinguish these meanings from each other
  • The problem that arises is that of knowing when to stop eliciting differentiae which individuate different instances of the object in question  CUP – MUG – GLASS  The lexicographer is required to posit sufficient differentiae to distinguish cup from mug and glass Theoretical model and practical issues However, to obtain the appropriate superordinates the lexicographer must:
  1. have already distinguished the senses in her/his mind
  2. have decided at what level of superordination the genus word will be chosen
  3. moreover, what seems to function satisfactorily with concrete nouns/common objects, does not fuction in the same way with more abstract words (degree/culture) or highly polysemous ones (such as do/say) to read through a large number of usages and determine distinct senses in a significant proportion of cases. Meaning not clearly distinguishable There are distinct and distinguishable senses of polysemous words which can be clearly defined and which are separable from each other with moderately clear boundaries HOWEVER Not all citational evidence can be clearly disambiguated in terms of (lexicographic) senses: Meanings blur into each other and Meanings are indistinct from each other. BLURRING
  4. Figurative/Metaphorical extensions of literal senses: Figurative extensions typically take the same syntactic and collocational environments as the literal sense from which they are derived
  1. Between two or more meanings: The word seems to bring in various extra nuances so that any individual utterance might suggest one strong aspect of a meaning but strengthened or supported by various other possible close meanings  The lack of clarity (‘vagueness’) in our use of the word culture makes it a handy word at one’s disposal: it offers semantic extras just because in most uses its possible meanings are not clearly distinguishable (cfr. example in dictionaries)  The convention of giving analytic definitions which detail the boundaries of word meaning for any one sense is perhaps a hindrance rather than an aid in showing where senses merge  With words like culture, even if definitions resembling analytic ones are used, it would be more realistic were the genus word and some differentiae directed toward the centre of a semantic area, rather than attempting to cover its blurred boundaries.

Chapter 8) Words in dictionary

 Dictionaries come in many shapes and sizes and are aimed at different groups of users. The mayor dictionary publishers are constantly surveying material for new words and new meanings.  Three major categories of English dictionary according to purpose:

  1. General purpose dictionaries: come in 3 many sizes (desk size, concise size, pocket size)
  2. Children’s dictionaries;
  3. Learner’s dictionaries  Difference in size is reflected partly in difference of format and page size, but more importantly from a lexical perspective, difference of vocabulary selection and information about words. Information about words
  4. Phonology: the pronunciation of a word and variants
  5. A word’s morpheme composition, and any irregular inflections
  6. Syntax: the word class and particular structures a word may enter
  7. Semantics: the “meanings” of a word and the semantic structures it may enter
  8. Context: restriction on social context and style in which a word may be used
  9. Spelling: the normal and any variant spellings of a word
  10. Etymology: the origin and history of a word
  11. Usage: frequency of use, when acquired, any taboos. Sense relations: linear relationship between polysemes  related readings of a polysemous word:
  12. senses have a linear relation if one is a specialization of the other (is a hyponym of…)
  13. we can distinguish specialization from generalization if we recognize one of the senses as more basic than the other Autohyponymy