



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Three alternative tools for stakeholder analysis: Stakeholder Profiles (4 A's), Stakeholder Mapping, Stakeholder Positioning, and Power-Interest-Matrix. These tools help in gaining a deeper understanding of stakeholders and their roles, interrelations, and influence on a project. Stakeholder Profiles use the 4 A's (Actor, Agenda, Arena, and Alliances) to analyze actors' names, functions, mandates, missions, fields of action, and alliances. Stakeholder Mapping involves identifying and analyzing the relations and ties among stakeholders, creating a visual representation of their influence and interconnections. Stakeholder Positioning focuses on the different perspectives of key stakeholders regarding the objectives of the cooperation. Lastly, the Power-Interest-Matrix sheds light on the interests and power of actors in the project and their potential impact on achieving the expected results.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




This additional reading provides you with three tools you can use in addition or as an alternative to the Stakeholder Analysis Matrix. These tools might help you to get a deeper understanding of the stakeholders and actors involved or to be involved in the project:
_1. Stakeholder Profiles (4 A’s)
To get a more detailed overview of the different actors in the project environment, we can draw profiles of all relevant actors, applying the method of the 4 A’s: Actor : What’s the actor’s name, what’s their function? Agenda : What’s the actor’s mandate, what’s their mission? Arena: In what fields are the actors active, where are they present? Alliances: With which other actors is the actor allied, how are they interconnected? Answering these questions allows us to make a first statement regarding the relative importance of certain actors for the programme. Alliances between actors become visible and we have an indication of the dynamics of the stakeholder landscape. Actor Name, function Agenda Mandate/mission, strategic objectives Arena Field of action, outreach Alliances Relations with other actors according to ABCD* Actor 1 Actor 2 Actor n *** …** A: Institutionalised relation, B: Regular exchange of information, C: Coordinated activities, D: Co- production using joint resources
To get an overview of the people and organisations liable to have an influence on the planned project activities, we map out the relevant stakeholders, and identify the different kinds of stakeholders as well as their interrelations. This allows us
Dotted lines represent weak or informal relations. A question mark is added if the relation is not clear. Double lines represent institutionally established alliances and cooperation. Arrows represent the direction of imbalanced relations. Lines interrupted by a flash represent tensions between actors, conflicts etc. Cross lines represent interrupted and broken relations between actors.
This instrument is focussing on the different perspectives of the key stakeholder in regard to the objectives of the cooperation. To define a key stakeholder, we look at three core functions that are crucial for holding a key position in the context of the project: a) Legitimacy: The actor has been elected or nominated to legally hold an important position of a governmental or non-governmental institution. b) Resources: The actor is disposing of substantial material and immaterial resources (financial resources, rights on or control over natural resources, expertise and knowledge, etc.) that make him an influential player in the programme context. c) Network. The actor has a great number of contacts and strong ties to other key players. Hence partnering with this actor means becoming part of and benefiting from an already existing network. To map out the interests of the key stakeholders and their position in regard to the main success factors of the cooperation programme, we may use the following table. Are the interests in line with the Main success factors in regard to the programme objectives: programme objectives? (1) .... (2) .... (3) ....
- - - + ++ Key stakeholder 1 .. .. .. Key stakeholder 2 .. .. .. Key stakeholder 3 .. .. .. Key stakeholder N
This instrument sheds light on the interest of possible actors in the project or aspects of it and on the power or influence of an actor to make things happen and to achieve the expected results. The power might derive from the resource base of particular actors, from their position and legitimacy, or from their contacts and networking capacities. The interest might be based on the official mandate of an actor, but also might arise from the expectation to get a piece of the cake for the sake of the organization or for personal benefit. Be aware that power can also be used against your noble intentions and that real, sometimes hidden interests can vary from assumed or officially declared interests. The actors in the quadrant A can be considered as “natural stakeholder”. They have interests and can influence the achievement of the objectives. The actors in quadrant B also require attention as, due to their power, they might show a destructive behaviour for instance when they are not informed and feel neglected. Actors in the quadrant C might seem to be unimportant, but maybe they are just cautious and decide to wait and see before they show more interest or make use of their influence. Actors in the quadrant D are important despite their lack of power. Often they are the ones who bring in expertise and/or the drive that makes the cooperation work. 04.2013/az-rb