Applied Biostatistics, Lecture Notes - Mathematics - 20, Study notes of Mathematical Methods

Proportions, risk ratios and odd ratio

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 09/10/2011

myohmy
myohmy ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

4.8

(10)

297 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Health Sciences M.Sc. Programme
Applied Biostatistics
Week 6: Proportions, risk ratios and odds ratios
Risk ratio or relative risk
Chi-squared tests are tests of significance, they do not provide estimates of the strength of
relationships. There are different ways of doing this for different kinds of data and sizes of table,
but two are particularly important in health research: the risk ratio or relative risk and the odds
ratio. Both apply to tables with two rows and columns.
Table 1. Cough during the day or at night at age 14 and bronchitis before age 5
Bronchitis at age 5 Cough at
age 14 Yes No
Total
Yes 26
44
70
No 247
1002
1249
Total 273
1046
1319
For example, consider Table 1. We ask: do children with bronchitis in infancy get more respiratory
symptoms in later life than others? We have 273 children with a history of bronchitis before age 5
years, 26 of whom were reported to have day or night cough at the age 14. We have 1046 children
with no bronchitis before age 5 years, 44 of whom were reported to have day or night cough at age
14. We thus have two proportions, 26/273 = 0.095 = 9.5% and 44/1046 = 0.042 = 4.2%.
We can find the difference between them, 0.095 โ€“ 0.042 = 0.053. We can find a standard error for
this, 0.019, and use it to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference:
0.053 โ€“ 1.96 ร— 0.019 to 0.053 + 1.96 ร— 0.019 = 0.016 to 0.090. We could also write this difference
as 9.5% โ€“ 4.2% = 5.3. We call this difference between two percentages 5.3 percentage points
rather than a percentage.
The proportion who cough is called the risk of cough for that population. Thus in Table 1 the risk
that a child with bronchitis before age 5 will cough at age 14 is 26/273 = 0.095, and the risk for a
child without bronchitis before age 5 is 44/1046 = 0.042. The difference is called the absolute risk
difference.
This difference in proportions may not very easy to interpret. The ratio of two proportions is often
more useful. The ratio of the proportion with cough at age 14 for bronchitis before 5 to the
proportion with cough at age 14 for those without bronchitis before 5 is 0.095/0.042 = 2.26.
Children with bronchitis before 5 are more than twice as likely to cough during the day or at night
at age 14 than children with no such history. We call this ratio the risk ratio or relative risk. Both
can be abbreviated to RR.
The standard error for this ratio is complex, and as it is a ratio rather than a difference it does not
approximate well to a Normal distribution. If we take the logarithm of the ratio, however, we get a
difference, because the logarithm of a ratio is the difference between the two logarithms. We can
find the standard error for the log ratio quite easily. For the example the log ratio = 0.817 and the
standard error = 0.238. The 95% confidence interval for the log ratio is therefore
0.817 โ€“ 1.96 ร— 0.238 to 0.817 + 1.96 ร— 0.238 = 0.351 to 1.283. The 95% confidence interval for
the ratio of proportions itself is the antilog of this, 1.42 to 3.61. Thus we estimate that the
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Applied Biostatistics, Lecture Notes - Mathematics - 20 and more Study notes Mathematical Methods in PDF only on Docsity!

1

Health Sciences M.Sc. Programme

Applied Biostatistics

Week 6: Proportions, risk ratios and odds ratios

Risk ratio or relative risk

Chi-squared tests are tests of significance, they do not provide estimates of the strength of relationships. There are different ways of doing this for different kinds of data and sizes of table, but two are particularly important in health research: the risk ratio or relative risk and the odds ratio. Both apply to tables with two rows and columns.

Table 1. Cough during the day or at night at age 14 and bronchitis before age 5 Cough at Bronchitis at age 5 age 14 Yes No

Total

Yes 26 44 70 No 247 1002 1249 Total 273 1046 1319

For example, consider Table 1. We ask: do children with bronchitis in infancy get more respiratory symptoms in later life than others? We have 273 children with a history of bronchitis before age 5 years, 26 of whom were reported to have day or night cough at the age 14. We have 1046 children with no bronchitis before age 5 years, 44 of whom were reported to have day or night cough at age

  1. We thus have two proportions, 26/273 = 0.095 = 9.5% and 44/1046 = 0.042 = 4.2%.

We can find the difference between them, 0.095 โ€“ 0.042 = 0.053. We can find a standard error for this, 0.019, and use it to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference: 0.053 โ€“ 1.96 ร— 0.019 to 0.053 + 1.96 ร— 0.019 = 0.016 to 0.090. We could also write this difference as 9.5% โ€“ 4.2% = 5.3. We call this difference between two percentages 5.3 percentage points rather than a percentage.

The proportion who cough is called the risk of cough for that population. Thus in Table 1 the risk that a child with bronchitis before age 5 will cough at age 14 is 26/273 = 0.095, and the risk for a child without bronchitis before age 5 is 44/1046 = 0.042. The difference is called the absolute risk difference.

This difference in proportions may not very easy to interpret. The ratio of two proportions is often more useful. The ratio of the proportion with cough at age 14 for bronchitis before 5 to the proportion with cough at age 14 for those without bronchitis before 5 is 0.095/0.042 = 2.26. Children with bronchitis before 5 are more than twice as likely to cough during the day or at night at age 14 than children with no such history. We call this ratio the risk ratio or relative risk. Both can be abbreviated to RR.

The standard error for this ratio is complex, and as it is a ratio rather than a difference it does not approximate well to a Normal distribution. If we take the logarithm of the ratio, however, we get a difference, because the logarithm of a ratio is the difference between the two logarithms. We can find the standard error for the log ratio quite easily. For the example the log ratio = 0.817 and the standard error = 0.238. The 95% confidence interval for the log ratio is therefore 0.817 โ€“ 1.96 ร— 0.238 to 0.817 + 1.96 ร— 0.238 = 0.351 to 1.283. The 95% confidence interval for the ratio of proportions itself is the antilog of this, 1.42 to 3.61. Thus we estimate that the

2

proportion of children reported to cough during the day or at night among those with a history of bronchitis is between 1.4 to 3.6 times the proportion among those without a history of bronchitis.

The odds ratio

The probability or risk of an event is the number experiencing the event divided by the number who could experience it. The odds of an event is the number experiencing the event divided by the number who do not experience it. For example, the risk of cough for a child with a history of bronchitis = 26/273, the odds of cough for a child with a history of bronchitis = 26/247.

In terms of risk, for every child, 0.095 children cough, for every 100 children, 9.5 children cough. In terms of odds, for every child who does not cough, 0.105 children cough, for every 100 children who do not cough, 10.5 children cough.

Consider Table 1. The probability of cough for children with a history of bronchitis is 26/273 = 0.095. The odds of cough for children with a history of bronchitis is 26/247 = 0.105. The probability of cough for children without a history of bronchitis is 44/1046 = 0.042. The odds of cough for children without a history of bronchitis is 44/1002 = 0.044.

One way to compare children with and without bronchitis is to find the difference between the proportions of children with cough in the two groups. Another is to find the odds ratio , often abbreviated to OR , the ratio of the odds of cough in children with bronchitis and children without bronchitis. This is (26/247)/(44/1002) = 0.105/0.044 = 2.40. Thus the odds of cough in children with a history of bronchitis is 2.40 times the odds of cough in children without a history of bronchitis. This is not the same as the relative risk.

Like RR, OR has an awkward distribution. We use the log odds ratio, which will follow an approximately Normal distribution provided the frequencies are not too small, and has a simple standard error. Hence we can find the 95% confidence interval. For Table 1, the log odds ratio = 0.874, with standard error = 0.257. Hence the approximate 95% confidence interval is 0.874 โ€“ 1.96 ร— 0.257 to 0.874 + 1.96 ร— 0.257 = 0.370 to 1.379. To get a confidence interval for the odds ratio itself we must antilog, giving 1.45 to 3.97.

The odds ratio for cough given a history of bronchitis = (26/247)/(44/1002) = 2.397. The odds ratio for a history of bronchitis given a current cough = (26/44)/(247/1002) = 2.397. It doesnโ€™t matter which way round we do it. Both OR = (26ร—1002)/(44ร—247) = 2.397. We therefore also call the odds ratio the ratio of cross products. This is not true for relative risk.

Switching the rows or columns inverts the odds ratio. For example, the odds ratio for no cough given a history of bronchitis = (247/26)/(1002/44) = 0.417 = 1/2.397. This is the reciprocal of the OR for cough. There are only two possible odds ratios, as switching both rows and columns gives us odds ratio we started with. On the log scale, these two odds ratios are equal and opposite: loge(2.397) = 0.874, loge(0.417) = โ€“0.874.

J. M. Bland, 17 August 2006