

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Critiques on two papers presented by kazuhisa inaba on january 25, 2008. The first paper, 'arc diagram: visualizing structure in strings' by martin wattenberg, discusses a method for visualizing string structures using diagrams. The second paper, 'digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling: posthistory and social network fragments' by fernanda b. Viegas, danah boyd, david h. Nguyen, jeffrey potter, and judith donath, presents visualization tools for archived emails. Both papers emphasize the importance of visualization and interaction in understanding complex data.
Typology: Papers
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Kazuhisa INABA Paper critiques for Jan 25, Arc Diagram: Visualizing Structure in Strings By Martin Wattenberg This paper presents a visualizing method for structure in strings. The uniqueness of this research is that it uses diagrams for visualization. The basic idea in this research is 1. Finding repeating sequence of strings, 2. Linking them with diagrams. Although this is a simple algorithm, it has a problem with “too many small repeated subsequences”. This problem was solved with a filter for subsequence length. This method is applied in several strings. First one is music. I believe that the visualization of music reminds us the structure of it. Second application is text files. This paper uses Java class file. HTML text file and DNA sequence. The results are very interesting. I thought the great advantage of this method is that we can use it in real time. It can update the visualizations. Though I know some visualization methods, they can not deal with time series data. If possible I would like to use this method for people’s activities, such as POS in shop, business activities and so on. Data in these area usually contains a lot of noise. Therefore, as author mentioned in summary, fuzzy technique will be very usuful.
Kazuhisa INABA Paper critiques for Jan 25, Digital Artifacts for Remembering and Storytelling: PostHistory and Social Network Fragments By Fernanda B. Viegas, Danah Boyd, David H. Nguyen, Jeffrey Potter and Judish Donath In this paper they present visualization tools for archived e-mail. One shows the visualization of social network and the other shows discussions in the past. The aspects of “people and time” are used in the tools. In the PostHistory function, they focused on 1. Daily email averages, 2.Daily quality of email, 3. Frequency of email exchange with contacts and 4. Comparative frequency of email exchanges with contact. The tool show the result with weekly based style. It shows the quantity of the email, directedness(whether email was sent only to user or group) and contacts (senders closeness). The user of this tool can retrieve information from it interactively. It enable user to understand and find the past relation ship based on email archives. In the other tool “Social network fragments”, they analyze the data focusing on 1. Knowledge ties, 2.Awareness ties, 3. Weak awareness ties and 4. Trusted ties. (The idea of using BCCs is interesting for me) It shows the relationship of users with different size User can trace the relationship in the past by using zoom up and out. The advantage of these tools are that users can interactively to the archived information. Therefore, user can explain the relationship with results. I believe that this interaction with computer is very important. The result of interaction reminds users other topics which can be used for next interaction. I think that both cases show the visualization and interaction are very effective for users to understand what happened in the past. The word story telling remind me the visualization of “Alice in Wonderland” by TextArc” ”. This tool is not giving us interactive interface, still it tells us the contents of the story. These kinds of visualization will give us some essence of the story. But each user might feel it different way.