

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An introduction to argumentative writing techniques for crafting persuasive essays. It covers various approaches, such as focusing and emphasizing one reason, and using point-counterpoint (concession-refutation) to acknowledge and refute opposing views. Examples and practical applications are given.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


The techniques of argument are not foreign to you. You use them all the time. You might just not take notice of them. For example, it's Friday night and you ask your Dad for the keys to the car. His reply is, "Why should I?" You then have to argue or persuade him to let you have the keys.
What you may not be as familiar or comfortable with is making arguments in writing.
It is important to remember that reasons are the foundation of any argument. Arguments without reasons are weak and would never be accepted in an academic essay.
Here are some argumentative approaches a writer could use:
Here are two argumentative techniques that if incorporated into your essay will make your writing more persuasive and effective. These techniques are "Focus and Emphasis" and "Point- Counterpoint."
Focus/Emphasis:
When using this technique, you present one reason as being the strongest and most important, and you spend more time developing and emphasizing it. Perhaps you have three to five good reasons for your position. By focusing and emphasizing on one, you give your argument something like a left hook a boxer saves for his opponent. Also, it is best to present the strongest reason last so that you leave your reader with your strongest argument freshest in his or her mind.
Here are two examples of topic sentences setting up the last body paragraph of an essay. Each signals focus and emphasis. Notice how the character of the argument would be different, depending upon which reason is emphasized.
Thinking carefully about the sequencing of your primary supports puts a "spin" or accent on your argument.
Point/Counterpoint (Concession-Refutation):
Point/Counterpoint (sometimes called "concession-refutation”) is an extremely persuasive and effective technique for arguing. To do Point-Counterpoint, the writer first "fairly summarizes" or even temporarily accepts (concedes) an opponent's argument. Then the writer REFUTES this argument with an argument of his or her own.
Most of us have been exposed to this technique if we have ever been approached by a salesperson trying to make a quick sell. These salespersons are trained in how to "overcome objections." For example, you are sitting at home minding your own business when the phone rings and you have this conversation:
Hello ," you say. " Hello, Mr. Jones. This is Tom with the Daily News. Would you like to get a subscription to our paper ?" says the salesman. " No ," you reply. " We don't have the spare money right now ." " Well, Mr. Jones. I can certainly understand not having enough money. Times are tight these days and money doesn't go as far as it used to. But did you know that with all the coupons in the Sunday edition alone you could save fifty dollars a week. Plus, with this one time offer, you will receive a 10% discount off the normal subscription rate ," says the salesman.
Notice how the salesman acknowledges the other person's argument, and tries to overcome it with counterarguments of his own.
This technique is effective because it communicates that you understand both sides of the issue. It makes you sound more credible and knowledgeable on the topic, and therefore more believable.
Here are some examples of Point-Counterpoint statements:
Notice that the refutations are signaled with transition words like "however," "but," or "although."
Here are some suggestions for addressing opposing viewpoints in an argument:
REMEMBER that when you do point-counterpoint, you fairly summarize an opposing view and always follow that summary with your counterargument which refutes that opposing view.