Bone Mechanical Testing by Three-Point Bending, Study notes of Physics

In a three-point bending test, the whole bone is placed in a fixture attached to a materials testing machine and loaded until broken (Fig. 1).

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/07/2022

adnan_95
adnan_95 šŸ‡®šŸ‡¶

4.3

(39)

918 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
M. J. Silva: Washington University Musculoskeletal Structure and Strength Core 4 May 2016
1
Bone Mechanical Testing by Three-Point Bending
In a three-point bending test, the whole bone is placed in a fixture attached to a materials testing machine and
loaded until broken (Fig. 1). This is a structural mechanical test because it tests the properties of the ā€œwhole
boneā€ as a structure. More precisely, it tests the mechanical properties of the mid-diaphysis, which is typically
all cortical bone. It is appropriate for testing femurs or other long bones. At the start of the test, the bone is an
undeformed state (zero displacement) and the loading point makes contact with the bone with a small pre-
load (< 1 N) in order to keep the bone in place. The loading point then moves progressively downward with
increasing applied load (or force, F) and displacement (d). Load and displacement values are recorded during
the test and stored in a data file. From these data we directly determine whole-bone (structural) mechanical
properties (section I). We then combine these properties with the bone geometric properties from microCT to
estimate bone material properties (section II). For this reason we do microCT scanning prior to mechanical
testing of the same bones.
I. Whole-Bone Mechanical Properties
A plot of the load vs. displacement data is generated for analysis (Fig. 2). From the load-displacement plot, we
derive a number of parameters that describe the structural properties. The five parameters recommended for a
basic description are: stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, post-yield displacement and work-to-fracture (Table 1).
Nomenclature: The terms ā€˜load’ and ā€˜force’ and are used interchangeably. Historically we have used ā€˜force (F)’,
but in keeping with a recent review article (1), we will adopt the term ā€˜load’ as our standard. This is strictly a
nomenclature issue and does not affect interpretation.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a three-point
bending test. Dark lines depict the undeformed
bone, and the lighter lines the deformed
(displaced) bone. The bone is place on two support
points, and a third (loading) point applies a
downward load at the mid-diaphysis. For femur
testing (as shown) we put the anterior surface
down so the posterior aspect of the femoral
condyles faces up. Failure typically occurs at or
near the loading site when a crack forms on the
anterior surface (tensile side) opposite the loading
point, and propagates across the bone to the
posterior surface (compressive side).
Figure 2. Example load-displacement plot from
a mouse femur bending test. The portion of the
curve to the left of the yield point represents
the elastic behavior of the bone. If you release
the load before reaching the yield point, the
bone springs back to its original shape like an
elastic band. To the right of the yield point
represents the post-yield (or plastic) behavior.
If you load past the yield point the bone will no
longer spring back to its initial shape but will be
permanently deformed (damaged). Past the
yield point the load increases to its maximum
value. The final event of the test is fracture,
when the load drops sharply toward zero.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Bone Mechanical Testing by Three-Point Bending and more Study notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Bone Mechanical Testing by Three-Point Bending

In a three-point bending test, the whole bone is placed in a fixture attached to a materials testing machine and loaded until broken (Fig. 1). This is a structural mechanical test because it tests the properties of the ā€œwhole boneā€ as a structure. More precisely, it tests the mechanical properties of the mid-diaphysis, which is typically all cortical bone. It is appropriate for testing femurs or other long bones. At the start of the test, the bone is an undeformed state (zero displacement) and the loading point makes contact with the bone with a small pre- load (< 1 N) in order to keep the bone in place. The loading point then moves progressively downward with increasing applied load (or force, F) and displacement (d). Load and displacement values are recorded during the test and stored in a data file. From these data we directly determine whole-bone (structural) mechanical properties (section I). We then combine these properties with the bone geometric properties from microCT to estimate bone material properties (section II). For this reason we do microCT scanning prior to mechanical testing of the same bones.

I. Whole-Bone Mechanical Properties

A plot of the load vs. displacement data is generated for analysis (Fig. 2). From the load-displacement plot, we derive a number of parameters that describe the structural properties. The five parameters recommended for a basic description are: stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, post-yield displacement and work-to-fracture (Table 1).

Nomenclature: The terms ā€˜load’ and ā€˜force’ and are used interchangeably. Historically we have used ā€˜force (F)’, but in keeping with a recent review article (1), we will adopt the term ā€˜load’ as our standard. This is strictly a nomenclature issue and does not affect interpretation.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a three-point bending test. Dark lines depict the undeformed bone, and the lighter lines the deformed (displaced) bone. The bone is place on two support points, and a third (loading) point applies a downward load at the mid-diaphysis. For femur testing (as shown) we put the anterior surface down so the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles faces up. Failure typically occurs at or near the loading site when a crack forms on the anterior surface (tensile side) opposite the loading point, and propagates across the bone to the posterior surface (compressive side).

Figure 2. Example load-displacement plot from a mouse femur bending test. The portion of the curve to the left of the yield point represents the elastic behavior of the bone. If you release the load before reaching the yield point, the bone springs back to its original shape like an elastic band. To the right of the yield point represents the post-yield (or plastic) behavior. If you load past the yield point the bone will no longer spring back to its initial shape but will be permanently deformed (damaged). Past the yield point the load increases to its maximum value. The final event of the test is fracture, when the load drops sharply toward zero.

Table 1. Standard whole-bone mechanical properties derived from a three-point bending test. ā€œStandardā€ nomenclature per Jepsen et al. (1)^ [units]

ā€œAlternativeā€ nomenclature [units] Stiffness [N/mm] same Yield Load [N] Yield Force [N] Maximum Load [N] Ultimate Force [N] Post-Yield Displacement (PYD) [mm] same Work-to-Fracture [Nmm] Energy-to-Fracture [Nmm]

What do these properties mean? Stiffness is defined as the slope (y/x) of the linear region of the load-displacement curve. It is a measure of the resistance offered by the whole bone to the applied displacement during the elastic region and is analogous to a simple spring constant (K) from physics. The stiffer a bone is the more force it takes to produce a given displacement, and hence a steeper slope. Yield load indicates the value of load at the yield point, which is where the load-displacement plot deviates from linearity. It is a measure of how much load the bone can sustain before it suffers permanent damage. It is one measure of a bone’s strength. Maximum load (aka, Ultimate Force) is simply the maximum value of load attained during the test. It is the simplest measure of the whole bone’s strength. The stronger a bone is, the higher its maximum load. Post-yield displacement (PYD) is the displacement from the yield point to the fracture point, and is a measure of ductility. A bone with high post-yield displacement is said to be ā€˜ductile’ and sustains a lot of damage before fracture. Bones with very little post-yield displacement are ā€˜brittle’ (chalk-like). Work-to-fracture (aka, Energy-to-fracture) is defined as the total area under the curve. It represents the work that must be done to fracture the bone, sometimes called the whole-bone toughness. A tough bone requires more work to fracture. Historical data are presented below (Appendix) for reference purposes.

Are these properties inter-related? Each property in Table 1 tells you something specific about whole-bone behavior. Nonetheless, under normal conditions the properties are not all independent, i.e., some are correlated. Stiffness, yield load and max. load are often highly correlated because they all vary in similar way with underlying bone traits (next section). Bones with high stiffness tend to be strong. Post-yield displacement is independent of the above. Work-to- fracture is influenced both by PYD and max load, and thus may correlate with either or both.

What other bone traits influence whole-bone mechanical properties? The two types of traits that influence whole-bone properties are: 1) morphology, 2) material properties. Mathematically, this can be expressed as: Structural Properties = f (Morphology, Material) Related to morphology, a bone with a larger diameter (width) at the mid-diaphysis will tend to be stiffer and stronger. Thus, if one of your experimental groups has increased bone area, you can expect that this will lead to increased stiffness and max. load. The larger bone may not have increased PYD, as this property tends to be more dependent on material. In terms of material properties, if the diaphysis is made of cortical bone that has high material strength, it will be stronger at the whole-bone level. This is explained further in Section II.

Does the geometry of the text fixture affect the properties? Yes! Each of the values in Table 1 depends on the distance between the supports (called the support span length, ā€˜L’ in Figure 1). Increasing span length will tend to result in lower values of stiffness, yield and max. load, while increasing PYD. This only matters if: 1) the span length is varied between samples in your study, or

  1. you are making comparisons between two studies done using different span lengths (or comparing 3- vs. 4- point bending data). This is why we do not often vary span length (L = 7 mm is our standard for femur). Note that there are ways to normalize values to account for the effect of span length; for more information, refer to Jepsen et al., Supporting Information, Section 1.(1). Historically, Silva lab papers have presented results in terms of these normalized values(2).

APPENDIX : HISTORICAL DATA

Femur three-point bending. Data from female and male Balb/C WT mice at 2, 4, 7, 12 and 20 months age (mean ± SD; n = 8-11/group). From Willingham et al. (support span = 7 mm)

Femur diaphyseal morphology. Data from female and male Balb/C WT mice at 2, 4, 7, 12 and 20 months age (mean ± SD; n = 8-11/group). From Willinghamm et al.

Femur material properties morphology. Data from female and male Balb/C WT mice at 2, 4, 7, 12 and 20 months age (mean ± SD; n = 8-11/group). From Willinghamm et al.

Reference: Willinghamm MD, Brodt MD, Lee KL, Stephens AL, Ye J, Silva MJ 2010 Age-related changes in bone structure and strength in female and male BALB/c mice. Calcif Tissue Int 86(6):470-83.

Female Male Age (mo) 2 4 7 12 20 2 4 7 12 20 Stiffness [N/mm]

Yield Load [N]

Max Load [N]

Post-Yield Displacement [mm]

Work-to-Fracture [Nmm]

Female Male Age (mo) 2 4 7 12 20 2 4 7 12 20 Bone Area (BA) [mm^2 ]

Cortical Thickness (Ct.Th) [mm]

Ixx [mm^4 ]

Female Male Age (mo) 2 4 7 12 20 2 4 7 12 20 Elastic Modulus (E) [MPa]

Yield Stress (y) [MPa]

Ultimate Stress (ULT) [MPa]