


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
business management business management
Typology: Exercises
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Question 1 (a) The loan is not a non-current liability for the year 2018 because the company is merely plan or having intention to apply for it in 2019. For a liability to be recognised in a balance sheet, the company needs to show that the obligation to sacrifice future economic benefits is present in the current financial year In their answers, these 2 points must be clearly related to the situation. (b) The statement of CF tells us how the business has generated cash during the period and where that cash has gone. It provides details of the sources and uses of cash that cannot be determined from the other financial statements. The cash flows are classified in three categories – operating, investing and financing activities. (c) i- Cost of sales = 54,000+130,000-44,000 = 140, ii- Gross profit = 200,000 - 140,000 = 60, iii- Net profit = 60,000-2,000-1,500-3,500= 53, Question 2 A. The current ratio increased from 2.1:1(in 201 8 ) to 3.1:1 (in 201 9 ), suggesting that the company has improved liquidity. However, the quick ratio decreased to 0.8:1 (in 2019 ) from 1.4:1 (in 201 8 ). This is an unfavourable indication as to immediate liquidity. This could also be explained by the slower inventory turnover in 201 9 ( days) than in 201 8 (110 days), suggesting the increase in current assets in 201 9 was mainly due to the accumulation of inventory. B. The ratios reveal that the accounts receivable turnover ratio is longer for 201 9 ( days) than 201 8 (21 days), indicating that the company took longer time to receive payments from its credit customers. This indicates the company is having problems with collecting debts. Nevertheless, there is not much difference between the times taken to pay accounts payable. In 201 9 , it took 50 days to pay its accounts payable, whereas in 201 8 it took 4 8 days. It is interesting to compare the difference in the accounts receivable and accounts payable collection periods for these two years. Since in 201 9 , the company allowed an average of 63 days’ credit to its customers, yet pays accounts payable within 50 days, it will require greater investment in working capital in 201 9 than in 201 8 , during which it only allowed an average of 21 days to its accounts receivable but took 45 days to pay its accounts payable. C. In 201 9 , the company had a much higher gross profit percentage than in 201 8. However, the net profit percentage for the two years was identical, which was 10%.
This suggested that in 2019, the company had much lower cost of goods sold, but higher operating costs than in 201 8. Question 3 A. There are two possible answers:
The project could cause environmental pollution which could compromise the company’s image. [Answers may consist the above points or other logical factors. All points must be clearly explained] B. Evaluate the proposed projects below. Based on the information given, which project would you choose to take on? Clearly explain your reasons. Accounting rate of return Payback period Net present value Project 1 25% 2.25 years 69, Project 2 21% 5 years 93, Choose Project 1 because it has higher ARR and shorter payback period. Also, the NPV
- These indicate that Project 1 is more profitable than Project 2. The company could recoup the initial investment amount in 2.25 years, which is much earlier than Project