cams lab experiment report, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Theory of Machines

aims, introduction, calculations, discussion

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2020/2021

Uploaded on 09/10/2021

bongani-malinga
bongani-malinga 🇿🇦

4

(1)

2 documents

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
i
UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL
ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment
Doornfontein Campus
BEng Tech in Mechanical Engineering
Mechanics of Machines 3A(MEMMIA3)
Experiment 3: Cams Analysis
NAME: Malinga BB (218059283)
LECTURER: K. Tekweme
Date: 16 June 2021
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Partial preview of the text

Download cams lab experiment report and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Theory of Machines in PDF only on Docsity!

i

UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG

DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL

ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment

Doornfontein Campus

BEng Tech in Mechanical Engineering

Mechanics of Machines 3A(MEMMIA3)

Experiment 3: Cams Analysis

NAME: Malinga BB (218059283)

LECTURER: K. Tekweme

Date: 16 June 2021

ii

Declaration (statement of originality)

I declare that this report is my own original work. All secondary material that was used,

whether from print or electronic sources, has been carefully acknowledged and referenced

according to the Mechanical Department requirements. I have not submitted this work for credit

previously. I understand that plagiarism is unacceptable, and I have studied the department’s

plagiarism and referencing policies as set out in the Learner guide.

iv

  • Figure 1: Circular cam List of Figures
  • Figure 2: Round and Flat cam follower
  • Figure 3: Front view and side view of gunt L112 Apparatus
  • Figure 4: Displacement vs angle curve
  • Figure 5: Velocity Vs angle curve
  • Figure 6: Acceleration vs Angle curve
  • Figure 7: Theory behind cams
  • Table 1: Specifications List of Tables
  • Table 2: Calculated results
  • Table 3: Calculated results

Aim

The aim of the experiment is to study the results obtained using different cam followers.

The objectives of the experiment include analyzing and comparing the theoretical displacement of

a cam profile to the experimental cam profile obtained and drawing the velocity and acceleration

cam profile.

Introduction

A cam is a machine member which is used to impart specified motion by direct contact to another

element machine called a follower. The cam either rotates or oscillates while a follower translates

or oscillates.

Cams are classified according to their shapes. There is a plate cam (disk), wedge cam, cylindrical

cam (barrel), end cam (face), conical cam and a globoidal cam (Khurmi& Gupta,2005). In this

experiment a circular cam will be studied. Followers are classified based on the line/angle of

action, motion sequence and based on geometric shape element. In this study the flat and round

follower will be looked at.

Figure 1 : Circular cam

Figure 2 : Round and Flat cam follower

Procedure

  1. The apparatus was switched on and it was ensured that the flat face follower was installed.
  2. Angular velocity was set to required speed.
  3. It was ensured that the paper was inserted and the probe was held down for one revolution.
  4. The probe was released and the apparatus was switched off.
  5. The flat face follower was removed and replaced with a roller follower.
  6. Steps 1-5 were repeated.

Results

Table 1 : Specifications

Base Radius R (mm) 25

Curved Flank Radius 96.

Nose Radius, r (mm) 10

Maximum lift (Cam Stroke), h (mm) 15

Total Angle of Action 2 × 𝛼 140 °

Table 2 : Calculated results

Variable Value

r

1

= OB 25mm

r

2

= Nose circle radius 10mm

R = QD = Flank circle radius 96.21mm

d = Distance between the cam centre and nose circle 30

α = Angle of ascent 70 °

ϕ = Angle of contact on circular flank

Table 3 : Calculated results

Sample calculations

Omega (ω) =

2πN

2π( 121 )

= 12 .671rad/s

Velocity

1

2

= 25 + 15 − 10 = 30mm

Analysis

Figure 4 : Displacement vs angle curve

Figure 5 : Velocity Vs angle curve

-0.

-0.

-0.

-0.

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

VELOCITY (M/S)

ANGLE (º)

Velocity vs Angle

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 7

14212835424956637077849198

105112119126133140

Displacement, s (m)

Angle (deg)

Displacement vs angle curve

Figure 6 : Acceleration vs Angle curve

Discussion

The objective of the experiment was to compare the experimental displacement curve, acceleration

curve and the velocity curve with the theoretical curves. The velocity, displacement and

acceleration were calculated using Microsoft excel (see appendix). The comparison between the

experimental curves (see figure 4,5 and 6) and the theoretical curve (see appendix) and it was

discovered that the curves are the similar. The graphs for the circular cams and roller with the flat-

faced follower were successfully drawn. It can be seen from the experimental and theoretical

curves that the flat follower slows its movement when closer to the nose of the circular cam.

The experimental curves are not exactly the same as the theoretical curves. This could be due to

experimental error when recording the results, not enough information provided for the drawing

of the curves and failure to follow proper procedure.

It is therefore recommended that enough data and formulae should be provided for the experiment

and proper procedure should be followed.

Conclusion

The aim of the experiment was to study the results obtained using different cam followers. The

aim also included comparing the experimental displacement curve, velocity curve and acceleration

curve with the theoretical curves. Though less data was provided for the experiment the aim of the

experiment was successfully achieved. Therefore, the experiment was a success.

0

5

10

15

0 50 100 150

ACCELERATION (N/S^2)

ANGLE (º)

Acceleration vs Angle

Appendices

Figure 7 : Theory behind cams