'Caught In-Between' Hazards, Schemes and Mind Maps of Construction

“Caught in-between” hazards kill workers in a variety of ways. These include: cave-ins and other hazards of excavation work; body parts pulled into unguarded ...

Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/01/2023

alfred67
alfred67 🇺🇸

4.9

(20)

328 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
FOCUS 4
Caught In-Between
Hazards
Trainer Guide
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY & HEALTH
This material was produced under grant number SH-16586-07-06 -F-36 from the Occupational Safet y and Health Administration, U.S. Depart-
men t of L abor. It doe s not n eces sar ily r efl ect the views or polic ies of the U.S. Department of L abor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial
products, or organizat ions imply endorsement by the U.S. Gover nment.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download 'Caught In-Between' Hazards and more Schemes and Mind Maps Construction in PDF only on Docsity!

FOCUS 4

‘Caught In-Between’

Hazards

Trainer Guide

CONSTRUCTION SAFETY & HEALTH

This material was produced under grant number SH-16586-07-06-F-36 from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Labor. It does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

MEXERCISEM

What’s Wrong With This Excavation?

Read the story and answer the questions: you should use the fact sheet that follows the story to help you answer the questions.

Union rep Bob Smith called the manager of ABC Company to insist that an unprotected excavating job be shut down immediately. He had received a call from his union safety steward, Jim Riley, about the problems at the site. The day before, Jim complained to his supervisor that a deep trench (about eight (8) feet deep), which was about four (4) feet wide at its base, was not shored (the sides of the trench weren’t supported to prevent a cave-in). The supervisor told Jim to shore it himself, which he tried to do.

When Jim came to work the second day, he saw some of his co-workers working in a second trench, which was also not shored. Excavated material was piled high, right at the edges of both trenches. Both trenches were about eight (8) feet deep. Workers were trying to repair a broken steam line. The steam line had been previously locked out and drained at the power plant supplying the steam.

Within one hour, Bob and an OSHA inspector arrived at the site after the union got management to shut down the job. The union acted because workers were exposed to “imminent danger to life or serious harm” and “the management of ABC Company had refused to cooperate with the union steward’s efforts to do the job safely.”

When the inspection took place, the OSHA inspector found:

✓ the soil content was 87 percent sand ;

✓ the depth of the two excavations was eight ( 8 ) feet, plus the height of the excavated material piled right on the edge;

✓ there was no shoring or other protective system on one of the excavations;

✓ there was inadequate sloping and shoring in the other excavation;

✓ the workers were not trained , and didn’t know how to properly construct shoring or other protective systems.

Unsafe Work: Workers are in a trench more than five (5) feet deep, with no protective system in place.

NQUESTIONSN

1. What happened at this excavation site?

● Employer failed to follow any of the OSHA standards for excavations. Quick action by the steward and the union helped to prevent a serious incident.

2. What were some of the violations of trenching safety?

● No soil classification was done, i.e., the type of soil was not determined ● No competent person when setting up a protective system ● Workers not properly trained to work in an excavation ● No competent person inspecting the excavation before entering

3. What kind of soil type was present at this excavation, and what should this have told the responsible people at the site?

● It was 87 percent sand , Type C soil. This should have told management that the soil was very unstable.

4. What was wrong with the way material was removed from this excavation?

● Material was piled high right at the edge of the trench – it should be at least three feet away. (NOTE: the OSHA standard says it must be at least two feet away; three feet away from the edge is safer.) ● If the soil is piled too close to the side of the trench, it adds weight to an unsupported edge, increasing the likelihood of a cave-in.

5. What training should have been done to protect these workers?

● Only a competent person authorized by the employer can act to correct hazardous conditions at the excavation site. ● All involved workers need training on excavation hazards and how to protect themselves.

OR

b. Trench box or shield: Although these are NOT designed to prevent cave-ins, they should protect workers within the structure if a cave-in occurs.

Trench Box: This worker will be safe as long as he stays inside the trench box while performing his work.

OR

c. Shoring: These are structures built of timber, or they can be mechanical or hydraulic systems, that support the sides of an excavation. Sheeting is a type of shoring that keeps the earth in place.

Shoring: The worker in the excavation is protected by a shoring system. (But watch out for that ladder! It doesn’t extend at least three (3) feet above the top of that wall for safe access and egress.)

  1. With shoring and shielding , workers are only protected as long as they stay within the confines of the system.
  2. If the competent person sees signs of a possible cave-in , even at depths less than 5 feet , one of the protective systems must be used.
  3. If the excavation is more than 20 feet deep , a professional engineer must design the system to protect the workers.
  4. A ladder, stairway or properly designed ramp is required in any trench 4 feet or deeper at least every 25 lineal feet of the trench. It’s best to have one at each end of an excavation.
  5. A competent person must determine the type of soil (Solid Rock, Type A, Type B, Type C) by using at least one visual and one manual test. This must be done before anyone enters the excavation.
  6. Hazardous atmospheres can sometimes be a danger in excavations. Air Testing is done in the following order, and hazards can include:

Oxygen-deficient atmospheres can asphyxiate (suffocate) you. You need at least 19.5 percent oxygen. Normal level is 20.9 percent.

Flammable gases or vapors , that reach a certain concentration known as their Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) , can lead to fires and explosions. In Excavations , you can’t exceed 20 percent of the LEL. (In Confined Spaces – a different standard – it’s 10 percent of LEL.)

Toxic gases or vapors can poison you, leading to death or serious health problems. Don’t exceed Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs).

  1. Remember: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call 811 to contact your local one-call service several days before you dig, to locate and mark with proper color codes all underground utilities. These could be: electrical, gas, water, sewer, steam, chemical and telecommunications. You must take additional precautions when reaching marked locations.
  2. BEWARE – SOIL IS VERY HEAVY! Some types of soil can weigh around 3,000 pounds (that’s 1.5 tons!) for every cubic yard. Don’t take chances – make sure a competent person has put a protective system in place before you start work.

Remember, the fatality rate of construction workers killed in unsafe excavations is MORE THAN TWICE the rate for all other construction workers that are killed on the job.

Training Evaluation – Focus 4 Construction Safety & Health

m“CAUGHT IN-BETWEEN” HAZARDSm

Date:

Location:

Trainer:

  1. Overall, how would you rate this training?

❑ Excellent ❑ Good ❑ Fair ❑ Poor

  1. Were the teaching methods (activities, exercises) effective?

❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not sure

  1. Were the handouts and materials useful?

❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not sure

  1. Will the information you received in this workshop be useful on your job?

❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not sure

  1. What did you like most about this training?
  2. What did you like least about this training?
  3. Please feel free to make additional comments or to suggest ways to improve the training.