Class Field Theory - Homework Six Questions | MATH 845, Assignments of Mathematics

Material Type: Assignment; Class: Class Field Theory; Subject: MATHEMATICS; University: University of Wisconsin - Madison; Term: Spring 1995;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-9if
koofers-user-9if 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MATH 845: HOMEWORK 6, DUE MAY 4.
11. Every year, the London Sunday Telegraph has a New Year’s Quiz. In 1995,
two of the questions were the following:
(a) Solve the equation A3/B3+C3/D3= 6, where A, B, C, D are all positive
whole numbers below 100.
(b) (A special question with a 450 pound prize.) Either give a second solution to
the above equation where the four variables are all whole numbers above 100 (A, B
and C, D relatively prime), or demonstrate that no such second solution can exist.
[It’s too late to claim the prize.]
12. The integer equation a4+ma2b2+b4=c2() (a, b) = 1, a, b > 0 was studied
by Fermat and Euler. A solution is called trivial if either ab = 0 or a=b= 1.
(a) Let Ebe the elliptic curve over Qgiven by y2=x3+mx2+x. Show that
() has a nontrivial solution if and only if the Mordell-Weil rank of Eis nonzero.
(b) Euler showed that for m= 14, there are only trivial solutions of (). Prove
this.
(c) Suppose L(E, s) = Pcn/ns. Since Eis modular (why?), work of Buhler,
Gross, et al. gives the formula:
L(E, 1) = Xcn(exp(2πnx/N) + exp(2πn/(xN)))/n
where xis any positive real number, Nis the conductor of E, and =±1 its
root number.
Explain why this formula gives a means of computing . In the case = 1, obtain
a simpler formula for L(E, 1).
(d) For m= 145, Euler claimed that () had a nontrivial solution, namely
(159,40). Show that he was mistaken.
(e) Kolyvagin proved the weak Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for modular
elliptic curves over Qwhose L-functions vanish to order at most 1 at s= 1. Show
how this gives a way to prove that for a given mthere are no nontrivial solutions.
For m= 145 compute the coefficients of L(E, s) up to n= 10 (the conductor of E
is 48048 and root number 1) - using (c), is this enough to determine whether ()
has nontrivial solutions for m= 145?
Typeset by A
M
S-T
E
X
1

Partial preview of the text

Download Class Field Theory - Homework Six Questions | MATH 845 and more Assignments Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

MATH 845: HOMEWORK 6, DUE MAY 4.

  1. Every year, the London Sunday Telegraph has a New Year’s Quiz. In 1995, two of the questions were the following: (a) Solve the equation A^3 /B^3 + C^3 /D^3 = 6, where A, B, C, D are all positive whole numbers below 100. (b) (A special question with a 450 pound prize.) Either give a second solution to the above equation where the four variables are all whole numbers above 100 (A, B and C, D relatively prime), or demonstrate that no such second solution can exist. [It’s too late to claim the prize.]
  2. The integer equation a^4 + ma^2 b^2 + b^4 = c^2 (∗) (a, b) = 1, a, b > 0 was studied by Fermat and Euler. A solution is called trivial if either ab = 0 or a = b = 1. (a) Let E be the elliptic curve over Q given by y^2 = x^3 + mx^2 + x. Show that (∗) has a nontrivial solution if and only if the Mordell-Weil rank of E is nonzero. (b) Euler showed that for m = 14, there are only trivial solutions of (∗). Prove this. (c) Suppose L(E, s) =

cn/ns. Since E is modular (why?), work of Buhler, Gross, et al. gives the formula:

L(E, 1) =

cn(exp(− 2 πnx/

N ) +  exp(− 2 πn/(x

N )))/n

where x is any positive real number, N is the conductor of E, and  = ±1 its root number. Explain why this formula gives a means of computing . In the case  = 1, obtain a simpler formula for L(E, 1). (d) For m = 145, Euler claimed that (∗) had a nontrivial solution, namely (159, 40). Show that he was mistaken. (e) Kolyvagin proved the weak Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for modular elliptic curves over Q whose L-functions vanish to order at most 1 at s = 1. Show how this gives a way to prove that for a given m there are no nontrivial solutions. For m = 145 compute the coefficients of L(E, s) up to n = 10 (the conductor of E is 48048 and root number 1) - using (c), is this enough to determine whether (∗) has nontrivial solutions for m = 145?