


















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Various theories of motivation, focusing on the role of expectations and valence in shaping behavior. Topics include Tolman's Purposive Behaviorism, Kurt Lewin's Field Theory, Expectancy Value Theory, and Social Learning. Understand how these theories help explain why some people perform better than others in their jobs and how they are influenced by cognitive factors.
Typology: Slides
1 / 26
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



















Persistent (behaviors continues until the goal is reached) Consistent Pattern (behavior is not random) Selectivity (behavior is specific and directed)
Behaviors that are directly observed not inference……..cat clawing Learning-performance distinction…finding a hotel Expectancies (behaviors lead to goals) Cognitive Map (where goals scan be found) Chain of responses instead of 1 stimulus lead to 1 response Place learning vs response learning
S= sensory information M= Motor Output I-P = Inner Personal Region Tension Psychological Needs Physiological Needs Locomotion Homeostatic in nature: Boundaries permeable and non-permeable
S-M
I-P
Psychological Facts-Knowledge Valence
Definitions Facts Change Post Hoc Lacked Controls
S-M I-P
Food at the Restaurant
Cook Leftovers in the Fridge
Internal Factors-knowledge experience External Factors
Reinforcement Value Subjective Estimates of obtaining particular reinforcers Situational factors (past) Generalized expectations (future)
Locus of control scale
Ms – motive for success; Maf-motive to avoid failure; Ps probability of success; Is – incentive value
If Ms > Maf then APPROACH ACHSituations
If Maf > Ms then AVOID ACHSituations
Ps and Is vary from situation to situation Easy tasks maximize Ps Difficult Tasks maximize Is
Criticisms of Need for Achievement Lack of replication (task difficulty) Ms and Maf difficult to understand Need for Ach may be complicated and multi dimensional in nature
Revisions
Intrinsic vs extrinsic: High Ms low Maf achieved higher grades
Performance goals vs mastery goals (Dweck 1986)
Intentions provide us with information whether or not to perform a given action and how much effort will one expend.
Ease or difficulty to achieve behavioral outcomes Past Behaviors Ability to overcome obstacles
Difficult to quantify accurately Relative importance of each belief is lost Adding additional predictors complicate the model