Complex Analysis 5 - Exercises Solution - Mathematics, Exercises of Mathematics

(from Stein

Typology: Exercises

2011/2012

Uploaded on 03/08/2012

arlie
arlie 🇺🇸

4.6

(18)

245 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 113 (Spring 2009) Yum-Tong Siu 1
Solution of Homework Assigned on February 12, 2009
due February 17, 2009
(numbering of problems continued from
the last assignment with the same due date)
Problem 8 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.65, #6). Let be an open subset of
Cand let T be a triangle whose interior is also contained in Ω. Suppose
that fis a function holomorphic in except possibly at a point winside T.
Prove that if fis bounded near w, then
ZT
f(z)dz = 0.
Use this and Morera’s theorem to show that a function which is holomorphic
in a deleted neighborhood of a point P0C(that is, a neighborhood of P0
minus the point P0itself) and is uniformly bounded in the deleted neighbor-
hood can be extended to a holomorphic function on the whole neighborhood.
Solution of Problem 8. Let Dε(w) denote the open disk of radius ε > 0
centered at w. There exists ε0>0 such that the topological closure of Dε0(w)
in Cis inside Ω. For any triangle TΩ, let Tεbe the contour which is the
union of TDε(w) and the part of the boundary of Dε(w) that is inside the
solid triangle enclosed by T. Then by Cauchy’s theorem
ZTε
f(z)dz = 0 for 0 < ε < ε0.
Since fis uniformly bounded in a deleted neighborhood of w, when we let
ε0, we conclude that
ZT
f(z)dz = lim
ε0ZTε
f(z)dz = 0.
First we make the additional assumption that fis continuous on to con-
clude that fcan be made holomorphic on including at the point w.
Now we look at the general case where fmay not be continuous. Without
loss of generality we can assume that is a bounded open disk in C. Since
ZT
f(z)dz = 0
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Complex Analysis 5 - Exercises Solution - Mathematics and more Exercises Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Solution of Homework Assigned on February 12, 2009 due February 17, 2009 (numbering of problems continued from the last assignment with the same due date)

Problem 8 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.65, #6). Let Ω be an open subset of C and let T ⊂ Ω be a triangle whose interior is also contained in Ω. Suppose that f is a function holomorphic in Ω except possibly at a point w inside T. Prove that if f is bounded near w, then ∫

T

f (z)dz = 0.

Use this and Morera’s theorem to show that a function which is holomorphic in a deleted neighborhood of a point P 0 ∈ C (that is, a neighborhood of P 0 minus the point P 0 itself) and is uniformly bounded in the deleted neighbor- hood can be extended to a holomorphic function on the whole neighborhood.

Solution of Problem 8. Let Dε(w) denote the open disk of radius ε > 0 centered at w. There exists ε 0 > 0 such that the topological closure of Dε 0 (w) in C is inside Ω. For any triangle T ⊂ Ω, let Tε be the contour which is the union of T − Dε(w) and the part of the boundary of Dε(w) that is inside the solid triangle enclosed by T. Then by Cauchy’s theorem ∫

f (z)dz = 0 for 0 < ε < ε 0.

Since f is uniformly bounded in a deleted neighborhood of w, when we let ε → 0, we conclude that ∫

T

f (z)dz = lim ε→ 0

f (z)dz = 0.

First we make the additional assumption that f is continuous on Ω to con- clude that f can be made holomorphic on Ω including at the point w.

Now we look at the general case where f may not be continuous. Without loss of generality we can assume that Ω is a bounded open disk in C. Since ∫

T

f (z)dz = 0

for any triangle T inside Ω, it follows that we can define a function F on Ω by defining its value at z ∈ Ω to be the integration of f (z) from w to z through the broken line which goes horizontally and then vertically so that F ′(z) = f (z) for z ∈ Ω − {w}. Since F is continuous on Ω, by the above argument F can be made to be holomorphic on Ω. Since F ′(z) = f (z) for z ∈ Ω − {w}, it follows that f (z) can be made holomorphic on all of Ω.

Problem 9 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.65, #8). If f is a holomorphic function on the strip − 1 < y < 1, x ∈ R with

|f (z)| ≤ A (1 + |z|)η^ , η a fixed real number

for all z in that strip, show that for each integer n ≥ 0 there exists An ≥ 0 such that (^) ∣ ∣f (n)(x)

∣ (^) ≤ An (1 + |x|)η^ , for all x ∈ R.

Hint: Use the Cauchy inequalities.

Solution of Problem 9. For x ∈ R, by applying Cauchy’s inequalities to f (z) on the open disk Dr(x) centered at x with radius 0 < r < 1, we have

∣ ∣f (n)(x)

∣ (^) ≤ n! rn^

sup |z−x|=r

|f (z)| ≤

n! rn^

A sup |z−x|=r

(1 + |z|)η^ ≤

n! rn^

A (2 + |x|)η^.

Letting r → 1, we get ∣ ∣f (n)(x)

∣ (^) ≤ n!A (2 + |x|)η^.

We need simply set

An = n! A sup x∈R

(2 + |x|)η (1 + |x|)η^

Problem 10 (from Stein & Shakarchi, p.66, #9). Let Ω be a bounded open subset of C, and ϕ : Ω → Ω a holomorphic function. Prove that if there exists a point z 0 ∈ Ω such that

ϕ (z 0 ) = z 0 and ϕ′^ (z 0 ) = 1

then ϕ is linear.

Hint: Why can one assume that z 0 = 0? Write ϕ(z) = z + anzn^ + O (zn+1) near 0, and prove that if ϕk = ϕ ◦ · · · ◦ ϕ (where ϕ appears k times), then ϕk(z) = z + kanzn^ + O (zn+1). Apply the Cauchy inqualities and let k → ∞ to conclude the proof. Here we use the standard O notation, where f (z) = O (g(z)) as z → 0 means that |f (z)| ≤ C |g(z)| for some constant C as z → 0. .