Conditional Specification, Summaries of Developmental biology

This document contains summarized view of Conditional Specification, one of the 3 types of specification process during animal embryo development.

Typology: Summaries

2025/2026

Available from 11/03/2025

aayushman-chakraborty
aayushman-chakraborty 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
AAYUSHMAN CHAKRABORTY
25mslsbc01
CONDITIONAL SPECIFICATION
DEFINITION:
The ability of cells to achieve their respective fate by interaction with other cells.
What a cell becomes depends on an array of interactions with its neighbors, which include:
i. Cell-to-cell contact (Juxtacrine factors).
ii. Secreted signals (Paracrine factors).
iii. Physical properties and its natural environment (Mechanical stress).
Fig. 1: Conditional
specification. (A)
What a cell becomes
depends on its
position in the
embryo. Its fate is
determined by the
interaction with its
neighboring cells. (B)
If cells are removed
from the embryo, the
remaining cells can
regulate & compensate for the missing part.
Weismann’s Hypothesis: When the first cleavage division separated the future ‘right’ & future ‘left
half of the embryo, there would be separation of ‘rightdeterminants from ‘leftdeterminants.
Wilhelm Roux’s test on Weismann’s Hypothesis: Roux killed one of t he two cells in a 2-cell stage
frog embryo, with the help of a hot needle. He observed that only the unaffected side of the embryo
developed into larva, while the damaged side degenerated and gave rise to a dead mass of cells.
Fig. 2: Roux’s
attempt to
demonstrate
autonomous
specification.
Destroying one
of a 2-cell frog
embryo
resulted in the
development of
only one half of the embryo.
He claimed that specification was autonomous and all the instructions for normal development were
present inside each cell.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Conditional Specification and more Summaries Developmental biology in PDF only on Docsity!

AAYUSHMAN CHAKRABORTY 25mslsbc

CONDITIONAL SPECIFICATION

DEFINITION:

The ability of cells to achieve their respective fate by interaction with other cells. What a cell becomes depends on an array of interactions with its neighbors, which include: i. Cell-to-cell contact (Juxtacrine factors). ii. Secreted signals (Paracrine factors). iii. Physical properties and its natural environment (Mechanical stress). Fig. 1: Conditional specification. (A) What a cell becomes depends on its position in the embryo. Its fate is determined by the interaction with its neighboring cells. (B) If cells are removed from the embryo, the remaining cells can regulate & compensate for the missing part. Weismann’s Hypothesis: When the first cleavage division separated the future ‘right’ & future ‘left’ half of the embryo, there would be separation of ‘right’ determinants from ‘left’ determinants. Wilhelm Roux’s test on Weismann’s Hypothesis: Roux killed one of t he two cells in a 2-cell stage frog embryo, with the help of a hot needle. He observed that only the unaffected side of the embryo developed into larva, while the damaged side degenerated and gave rise to a dead mass of cells. Fig. 2: Roux’s attempt to demonstrate autonomous specification. Destroying one of a 2-cell frog embryo resulted in the development of only one half of the embryo. He claimed that specification was autonomous and all the instructions for normal development were present inside each cell.

AAYUSHMAN CHAKRABORTY 25mslsbc Hans Driesch: i. Isolation experiment: Dreisch performed this experiment with 2-cell, 4-cell and 8-cell stage sea urchin embryo. He separated the blastomeres of the embryo by shaking vigorously. Each blastomeres of the 2-cell stage embryo developed into a complete Pluteus larva. While, some of the blastomeres from 4-cell & 8-cell embryo developed into an entire Pluteus larva. Fig. 3: Dreisch’s demonstration of conditional specification. ii. These experiments were the first evidences that a cell fate depends on its neighbors. The cells fate was altered to suite conditions iii. Dreisch’s pressure plate experiment: In sea urchin, first two cleavage are always Meridional (through both animal & vegetal poles) 7 the third equatorial, dividing the embryo into 4 upper & 4 lower cells. Dreisch changed the direction of third cleavage by gently pressing the embryo between two glass plates. The third division was observed to be Meridional instead of equatorial. When the pressure was released, the fourth division was observed to be equatorial. Some nuclei that would have produces dorsal structures in the unaffected embryo went to ventral side and vise versa. But, this gave rise to a normal embryo instead of a distorted embryo. Dreisch concluded that the relative position of the blastomere within the whole will probably in a general way determine what shall come from it. Fig. 4: Dreisch’s pressure plate experiment for altering the distribution of nuclei. SOURCE: Developmental Biology by S.F. Gilbert and M.J.F. Barresi, 11th^ Edition.