Download Legal Frameworks for Criminal Rape: Common Law and Statutory Interpretations and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!
Criminal Rape – Legal Frameworks
us.docsity.com
Elements Common Law MPC Majority-Statute Minority-Statute NOTES - NO STATUTORY RAPE in MPC see §213.
- Sexual Assault (lesser forms of rape): §213.
- GSI: Rape w/o resistance or physical force (threats) Issue of FORCE or THREAT of FORCE *Florida-no force=2nd^ degree rape *Wisconsin- 3 rd degree no force (1st^ and 2nd degree have force requirement) Physical force risking serious bodily injury or threat of serious bodily injury or threat required Verbal threat- not force=not rape Compelled to submit by force or by threat of serious bodily injury, or by threat of imminent death, extreme pain or kidnapping, to be inflicted on anyone GSI : Compelled to submit by threat that would prevent resistance by a woman of ordinary resolution (reasonable person standard) *MPC follows majority statute Mary: R usk - reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury can replace need for force or resistance CA: force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another NY: use of physical force or threat which places a person in fear of immediate death or physical harm (others included) NC: needs to be force beyond that needed for penetration (serious bodily harm) Montana: must be threat of bodily harm (Thompson) Penn : compulsion by physical, intellectual, emotional, moral, or psychological force NJ : no force beyond that needed to penetrate ( MTS ) NH : Threats of retaliation enough to show force ( Lovely )
Criminal Rape – Legal Frameworks
us.docsity.com
Resistance - Requirement of reasonable resistance to prove force or no resistance if reasonable fear of bodily harm ( Rusk )
- Requirement of reasonable resistance to prove force for rape (More than token resistance) GSI : No proof of resistance required if threat creates reasonable fear that precludes resistance
- Reasonable resistance or fear explaining lack of resistance (some states require physical if possible but some say it can be verbal) Note: Only Louisiana says resistance to the utmost NJ : no resistance at all; lack of permission is enough Mass : No need for physical resistance-verbal resistance is enough absent fear Consent (Mens Rea) Most states permit an honest and reasonable mistake as to defense (Not strict liability) Reckless (disregard a known risk) is requisite mens rea Most states permit an honest and reasonable mistake as to defense (Not strict liability) Strict liability on consent: - No mistake defenses in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania
- NJ and Wis: Need affirmative consent through words or actions (reasonable view) Fraud in the factum: misunderstanding the act itself or the other person
- Impersonation of her husband by fraudulent marriage; half asleep crawl into bed and pretend to be her husband
- Doctor inserts something other than a medical tool Fraud in the inducement: A collateral matter like a promise; seduction with lies; person knows what they are doing and who they are doing it with