Legal Frameworks for Criminal Rape: Common Law and Statutory Interpretations, Study notes of Law

An overview of the legal frameworks surrounding criminal rape under common law and the model penal code (mpc). It covers various elements of rape, including force or threat of force, statutory rape, and resistance. The document also discusses the concept of consent and the role of mens rea in rape cases.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 05/17/2012

gator_law
gator_law 🇺🇸

4.3

(4)

13 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Criminal(Rape(–(Legal(Frameworks(
( ( us.docsity.com(
Elements
Common Law
MPC
Majority-Statute
Minority-Statute
NOTES
-NO
STATUTORY
RAPE in MPC see
§213.3
-Sexual Assault
(lesser forms of
rape): §213.4
-GSI: Rape w/o
resistance or
physical force
(threats)
Issue of FORCE
or THREAT of
FORCE
*Florida-no
force=2nd degree
rape
*Wisconsin-3rd
degree no force
(1st and 2nd
degree have
force
requirement)
Physical force
risking serious
bodily injury or
threat of serious
bodily injury or
threat required
Verbal threat-
not force=not
rape
Compelled to
submit by force or
by threat of serious
bodily injury, or
by threat of
imminent death,
extreme pain or
kidnapping, to be
inflicted on anyone
GSI: Compelled
to submit by threat
that would prevent
resistance by a
woman of ordinary
resolution
(reasonable person
standard)
*MPC follows
majority statute
Mary: Rusk-
reasonable fear
of death or
serious bodily
injury can
replace need for
force or
resistance
CA: force,
violence, duress,
menace, or fear of
immediate and
unlawful bodily
injury on the
person or another
NY: use of
physical force or
threat which
places a person in
fear of immediate
death or physical
harm (others
included)
NC: needs to be
force beyond that
needed for
penetration
(serious bodily
harm)
Montana: must be
threat of bodily
harm (Thompson)
Penn:
compulsion by
physical,
intellectual,
emotional, moral,
or psychological
force
NJ: no force
beyond that
needed to
penetrate (MTS)
NH: Threats of
retaliation enough
to show force
(Lovely)
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Legal Frameworks for Criminal Rape: Common Law and Statutory Interpretations and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Criminal Rape – Legal Frameworks

us.docsity.com

Elements Common Law MPC Majority-Statute Minority-Statute NOTES - NO STATUTORY RAPE in MPC see §213.

  • Sexual Assault (lesser forms of rape): §213.
  • GSI: Rape w/o resistance or physical force (threats) Issue of FORCE or THREAT of FORCE *Florida-no force=2nd^ degree rape *Wisconsin- 3 rd degree no force (1st^ and 2nd degree have force requirement) Physical force risking serious bodily injury or threat of serious bodily injury or threat required Verbal threat- not force=not rape Compelled to submit by force or by threat of serious bodily injury, or by threat of imminent death, extreme pain or kidnapping, to be inflicted on anyone GSI : Compelled to submit by threat that would prevent resistance by a woman of ordinary resolution (reasonable person standard) *MPC follows majority statute Mary: R usk - reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury can replace need for force or resistance CA: force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on the person or another NY: use of physical force or threat which places a person in fear of immediate death or physical harm (others included) NC: needs to be force beyond that needed for penetration (serious bodily harm) Montana: must be threat of bodily harm (Thompson) Penn : compulsion by physical, intellectual, emotional, moral, or psychological force NJ : no force beyond that needed to penetrate ( MTS ) NH : Threats of retaliation enough to show force ( Lovely )

Criminal Rape – Legal Frameworks

us.docsity.com

Resistance - Requirement of reasonable resistance to prove force or no resistance if reasonable fear of bodily harm ( Rusk )

  • Requirement of reasonable resistance to prove force for rape (More than token resistance) GSI : No proof of resistance required if threat creates reasonable fear that precludes resistance
    • Reasonable resistance or fear explaining lack of resistance (some states require physical if possible but some say it can be verbal) Note: Only Louisiana says resistance to the utmost NJ : no resistance at all; lack of permission is enough Mass : No need for physical resistance-verbal resistance is enough absent fear Consent (Mens Rea) Most states permit an honest and reasonable mistake as to defense (Not strict liability) Reckless (disregard a known risk) is requisite mens rea Most states permit an honest and reasonable mistake as to defense (Not strict liability) Strict liability on consent: - No mistake defenses in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania
  • NJ and Wis: Need affirmative consent through words or actions (reasonable view) Fraud in the factum: misunderstanding the act itself or the other person
  • Impersonation of her husband by fraudulent marriage; half asleep crawl into bed and pretend to be her husband
  • Doctor inserts something other than a medical tool Fraud in the inducement: A collateral matter like a promise; seduction with lies; person knows what they are doing and who they are doing it with