Critical Theories Notes, Lecture notes of International Relations

These notes analyze the critical theories in international relations

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Available from 02/12/2023

esaul5163
esaul5163 🇺🇸

5 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Feminist Perspective
It came into the international relations field in the 1980s
Gender-sensitive lens
Gender is a social construction
Masculine characteristics are seen as more valuable
Gender bias shapes the “study” and “practice” of international relations
Study→ International relations has been disproportionately filled by male
scholars in composition
How states conduct international relations→ Male decision-makers are more
likely to go to war than female decision-makers
Gendering War
If you are a feminist scholar in international relations, how would you challeneg the way
we see war?
“Protection Myth” → Men fight wars to protect women and children
Women are subject to rape and prostitution
Rape as a weapon of war
The myth has made women’s roles in war invisible
Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation (Tickner
1988)
Politics is governed by objected laws that have their roots in human nature, which is
unchanging
A feminist perspective believes that objectivity is associated with masculinity.
Objective laws of human nature are based on a partial masculine view of human
nature
A state’s interests are defined in terms of power. (rational, objective, and unemotional)
A feminist perspective believe thate the national interes is multidimensional and
contextual contingent. It cannot be solely defined in terms of power
Interest defined as power is an objective category which is universally valid. Power is the
control of man over man
Power cannot be infused with meaning that is universally valid. Power as
domination and control privileges masculinity and ignores the possibility of
collective empowerment
Political realism is aware of the moral significance of political action. It is also aware of
the tension between the moral command and the requirements of successful political
action
Political realism refuses to identify the moral aspirations of a particular nation with the
moral laws that govern the universe
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Critical Theories Notes and more Lecture notes International Relations in PDF only on Docsity!

Feminist Perspective ● It came into the international relations field in the 1980s ● Gender-sensitive lens ● Gender is a social construction ○ Masculine characteristics are seen as more valuable ● Gender bias shapes the “study” and “practice” of international relations ○ Study→ International relations has been disproportionately filled by male scholars in composition ○ How states conduct international relations→ Male decision-makers are more likely to go to war than female decision-makers Gendering War ● If you are a feminist scholar in international relations, how would you challeneg the way we see war? ● “Protection Myth” → Men fight wars to protect women and children ● Women are subject to rape and prostitution ● Rape as a weapon of war ● The myth has made women’s roles in war invisible Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation (Tickner 1988) ● Politics is governed by objected laws that have their roots in human nature, which is unchanging ○ A feminist perspective believes that objectivity is associated with masculinity. Objective laws of human nature are based on a partial masculine view of human nature ● A state’s interests are defined in terms of power. (rational, objective, and unemotional) ○ A feminist perspective believe thate the national interes is multidimensional and contextual contingent. It cannot be solely defined in terms of power ● Interest defined as power is an objective category which is universally valid. Power is the control of man over man ○ Power cannot be infused with meaning that is universally valid. Power as domination and control privileges masculinity and ignores the possibility of collective empowerment ● Political realism is aware of the moral significance of political action. It is also aware of the tension between the moral command and the requirements of successful political action ● Political realism refuses to identify the moral aspirations of a particular nation with the moral laws that govern the universe

○ A feminist perspective seesk to find common moral elements in human aspirations which could become the basis ● Political realism maintains the autonomy of the political sphere… In order to develop an autonomous theory of political behavior, “political man” must be abstracted from other aspects of human nature ○ A feminist perspective denied the validity of the autonomy of the political… Building boundaries around a narrowly defined political realm defined political in a way that excludes the concerns and contributions of women Karl Marx ● Historical materialism: economics → history ● Capitalism’s contradiction: inequality between bourgeoisie and proletariat ● Leads to revolution, dictatorship of proletariat Neo-Marxism in International Relations ● Two sets of states: Dominant and Dependent countries ○ Dominant→ advanced industrial ○ Dependent→ developing ● International relations is hierarchical and a byproduct of imperialism ● Multinational corporations are controlled by the dominant countries and are key actors in the international systems ● International relations is inherently conflictual; conflict is driven by these economic interests Kenneth Waltz: Man, the State, and War ● Levels of Analysis Framework ● “Are there ways of decreasing the incidence of war, of increasing the chances of peace? Can we have peace more often in the future than in the past?” ● “To explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” ● Waltz classified war causes into three different set of factors: ○ Individual related factors ■ State foreign policy is primarily determined by the nature of the human being ■ Emphasizes real people ■ Decision maker’s rationality ■ Decision maker’s personality ■ Perceptions/ misperceptions ■ Motivations ■ Belief systems

Availability Heuristic ● Decision makers tend to understand new information in terms of what most quickly and easily comes to mind ● It inclined us to predict the chance of an event based on how easily we can think of examples of similar events ● Example: 9/11 Attacks Egocentric Bias ● Decision makers tend to exaggerate the odds that other states’ behaviors are caused by our own actions ● Fundamental attribution error ● Example: The Iraq War in 2003? Historical Analogies ● Policy makers tend to use past events as cues to help their thinking about present problems ● Historical lessons help them make inferences about missing information ● Munich Analogy→ reference to Munich conference (1938) and appeasement of Hitler ○ Truman saw North Korean invasion of South Korea the same as Hitler invading Czechoslovakia ○ John Kerry in 2013 compares Syrian President to Hitler The Role of Emotion ● Emotion→ “The inner states that individual describe to others as feelings, and those feelings may be associated with biological, cognitive, and behavioral states and changes ● Example→ Deterrence ○ An actor’s ability to prevent others from doing something that is undesirable or harmful to its own interests ○ If an actor send a strong and credible threat, an opponent will be rationally deterred ● Fearful actors tend to: ○ Make less careful decisions ○ Gather information in a way that over perceived threats, thereby intensifies fear ○ Emphasizes the short term rather than the long term Risk Propensity/ Risk Bias ● Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979) ● Policy makers tend to have a set of identifiable biases in terms of how they deal with risk ● People have different mindsets when they are dealing with gains and losses

Prospect Theory ● People are more sensitive to changes in wealth rather than wealth in total. The reference point matters ● People tend to perceive the gravity of losses as being more significant than gains ○ The general tendency of policy choices is toward loss aversion ● People tend to be risk-averse if they believe themselves to be facing gains. Conversely, they tend to be risk-acceptant if they believe that they are facing losses ○ The importance of framing ● People tend to accommodate gains more rapidly than losses ○ Accomodation→ how quickly and completely they come to accept gains or losses ○ Decision makers are less likely to accept losses. They tend to take risks to recover losses The Individual Level of Analysis ● When only the top executives and their advisers make a decision ● When the available information concerning the situation is extremely low ● When a decision is made in a nonroutine or unanticipated situation ● When the top decision makers have little experience or training in foreign policy