



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
These notes analyze the critical theories in international relations
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Feminist Perspective ● It came into the international relations field in the 1980s ● Gender-sensitive lens ● Gender is a social construction ○ Masculine characteristics are seen as more valuable ● Gender bias shapes the “study” and “practice” of international relations ○ Study→ International relations has been disproportionately filled by male scholars in composition ○ How states conduct international relations→ Male decision-makers are more likely to go to war than female decision-makers Gendering War ● If you are a feminist scholar in international relations, how would you challeneg the way we see war? ● “Protection Myth” → Men fight wars to protect women and children ● Women are subject to rape and prostitution ● Rape as a weapon of war ● The myth has made women’s roles in war invisible Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation (Tickner 1988) ● Politics is governed by objected laws that have their roots in human nature, which is unchanging ○ A feminist perspective believes that objectivity is associated with masculinity. Objective laws of human nature are based on a partial masculine view of human nature ● A state’s interests are defined in terms of power. (rational, objective, and unemotional) ○ A feminist perspective believe thate the national interes is multidimensional and contextual contingent. It cannot be solely defined in terms of power ● Interest defined as power is an objective category which is universally valid. Power is the control of man over man ○ Power cannot be infused with meaning that is universally valid. Power as domination and control privileges masculinity and ignores the possibility of collective empowerment ● Political realism is aware of the moral significance of political action. It is also aware of the tension between the moral command and the requirements of successful political action ● Political realism refuses to identify the moral aspirations of a particular nation with the moral laws that govern the universe
○ A feminist perspective seesk to find common moral elements in human aspirations which could become the basis ● Political realism maintains the autonomy of the political sphere… In order to develop an autonomous theory of political behavior, “political man” must be abstracted from other aspects of human nature ○ A feminist perspective denied the validity of the autonomy of the political… Building boundaries around a narrowly defined political realm defined political in a way that excludes the concerns and contributions of women Karl Marx ● Historical materialism: economics → history ● Capitalism’s contradiction: inequality between bourgeoisie and proletariat ● Leads to revolution, dictatorship of proletariat Neo-Marxism in International Relations ● Two sets of states: Dominant and Dependent countries ○ Dominant→ advanced industrial ○ Dependent→ developing ● International relations is hierarchical and a byproduct of imperialism ● Multinational corporations are controlled by the dominant countries and are key actors in the international systems ● International relations is inherently conflictual; conflict is driven by these economic interests Kenneth Waltz: Man, the State, and War ● Levels of Analysis Framework ● “Are there ways of decreasing the incidence of war, of increasing the chances of peace? Can we have peace more often in the future than in the past?” ● “To explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” ● Waltz classified war causes into three different set of factors: ○ Individual related factors ■ State foreign policy is primarily determined by the nature of the human being ■ Emphasizes real people ■ Decision maker’s rationality ■ Decision maker’s personality ■ Perceptions/ misperceptions ■ Motivations ■ Belief systems
Availability Heuristic ● Decision makers tend to understand new information in terms of what most quickly and easily comes to mind ● It inclined us to predict the chance of an event based on how easily we can think of examples of similar events ● Example: 9/11 Attacks Egocentric Bias ● Decision makers tend to exaggerate the odds that other states’ behaviors are caused by our own actions ● Fundamental attribution error ● Example: The Iraq War in 2003? Historical Analogies ● Policy makers tend to use past events as cues to help their thinking about present problems ● Historical lessons help them make inferences about missing information ● Munich Analogy→ reference to Munich conference (1938) and appeasement of Hitler ○ Truman saw North Korean invasion of South Korea the same as Hitler invading Czechoslovakia ○ John Kerry in 2013 compares Syrian President to Hitler The Role of Emotion ● Emotion→ “The inner states that individual describe to others as feelings, and those feelings may be associated with biological, cognitive, and behavioral states and changes ● Example→ Deterrence ○ An actor’s ability to prevent others from doing something that is undesirable or harmful to its own interests ○ If an actor send a strong and credible threat, an opponent will be rationally deterred ● Fearful actors tend to: ○ Make less careful decisions ○ Gather information in a way that over perceived threats, thereby intensifies fear ○ Emphasizes the short term rather than the long term Risk Propensity/ Risk Bias ● Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979) ● Policy makers tend to have a set of identifiable biases in terms of how they deal with risk ● People have different mindsets when they are dealing with gains and losses
Prospect Theory ● People are more sensitive to changes in wealth rather than wealth in total. The reference point matters ● People tend to perceive the gravity of losses as being more significant than gains ○ The general tendency of policy choices is toward loss aversion ● People tend to be risk-averse if they believe themselves to be facing gains. Conversely, they tend to be risk-acceptant if they believe that they are facing losses ○ The importance of framing ● People tend to accommodate gains more rapidly than losses ○ Accomodation→ how quickly and completely they come to accept gains or losses ○ Decision makers are less likely to accept losses. They tend to take risks to recover losses The Individual Level of Analysis ● When only the top executives and their advisers make a decision ● When the available information concerning the situation is extremely low ● When a decision is made in a nonroutine or unanticipated situation ● When the top decision makers have little experience or training in foreign policy