Data Analysis, Practical - Engineering - 20, Study notes of Engineering Physics

Theory of AC circuits

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 09/08/2011

russel85
russel85 🇬🇧

4.6

(5)

285 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Theory of AC Circuits
1 Sinusoidal Waveforms
Let’s return to the simple series LCR circuit
E=IR +LdI
dt +1
CZIdt
What now if the voltage applied to such a circuit (and similar circuits) is sinusoidal rather
than a square wave.
E=E0cos ωt or E=E0sin ωt
However instead let us use instead a “complex” form
E=E0exp iωt =E0cos ωt +iE0sin ωt
Furthermore let us guess the solution to the differential equation as
I=I0exp i(ωt +φ)
The question is what are the values of I0and φwhich give us the solution. First we
need to know
dI
dt =I0
d
dt exp i(ωt +φ)=iωI0exp i(ωt +φ)
ZIdt =I0Zexp i(ωt +φ)dt =I0exp i(ωt +φ)
Then if we substitute all of this into the differential equation we have
E0exp i(ωt)=I
0
Rexp i(ωt +φ)+iωI0Lexp i(ωt +φ)+ I
0
iωC exp i(ωt +φ)
E0=I0exp ·R+iµωL 1
ωC ¶¸
=I0exp sR2+µωL 1
ωC 2
exp iarctan ÃωL 1
ωC
R!
=I0sR2+µωL 1
ωC 2
exp i"φarctan Ã1
ωC ωL
R!#
1
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Data Analysis, Practical - Engineering - 20 and more Study notes Engineering Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Theory of AC Circuits

1 Sinusoidal Waveforms

Let’s return to the simple series LCR circuit

E = IR + L

dI dt

C

∫ Idt

What now if the voltage applied to such a circuit (and similar circuits) is sinusoidal rather than a square wave.

E = E 0 cos ωt or E = E 0 sin ωt

However instead let us use instead a “complex” form

E = E 0 exp iωt = E 0 cos ωt + iE 0 sin ωt

Furthermore let us guess the solution to the differential equation as

I = I 0 exp i(ωt + φ)

The question is — what are the values of I 0 and φ which give us the solution. First we need to know

dI dt

= I 0

d dt exp i(ωt + φ) = iωI 0 exp i(ωt + φ) ∫ Idt = I 0

∫ exp i(ωt + φ)dt = I 0 exp i(ωt + φ) iω

Then if we substitute all of this into the differential equation we have

E 0 exp i(ωt) = I 0 R exp i(ωt + φ) + iωI 0 L exp i(ωt + φ) +

I 0

iωC exp i(ωt + φ)

⇒ E 0 = I 0 exp iφ

[ R + i

( ωL −

ωC

)]

= I 0 exp iφ

√ R^2 +

( ωL −

ωC

) 2 exp i arctan

( ωL − (^) ωC^1 R

)

= I 0

√ R^2 +

( ωL −

ωC

) 2 exp i

[ φ − arctan

( (^1) ωC −^ ωL R

)]

which means that the solutions we are looking for are

φ = arctan

( (^1) ωC −^ ωL R

)

I 0 =

√ E^0

R^2 +

( ωL − (^) ωC^1

) 2

If we use these values for I 0 and φ then the equation I(t) = I 0 exp i(ωt + φ) solves the differntial equation.

2 Complex Impedances

We do not have to use differential equations to “solve” circuits involving AC sinusoidal waveforms, instead we can use ordinary algebra but with complex numbers. In ordinary resistor (only) circuits we could use (the simple) Ohms law V = IR to solve circuits.

In series E = IRT otal = V 1 + V 2 = I(R 1 + R 2 ) ⇒ RT otal = R 1 + R 2

and in parallel

E = I 1 R 1 = I 2 R 2 = (I 1 + I 2 )RT otal ⇒

RT otal

R 1

R 2

For each of our elements in the LCR circuits we can have an equivalent of Ohm’s law for that element if we assume that the current in the circuit is given by I(t) = I 0 exp iωt and that the applied volatge is E(t) = E 0 exp iωt. Note I 0 is a complex number. Then for each of our elements we can generate an Ohm’s law equivalent V = IZ where Z is known as the impedance. For a resistor VR = IR ⇒ ZR = R

For an inductor VL = L dI dt = iωLI ⇒ ZL = iωL

For a capacitor

VC =

C

∫ Idt =

iωC

I ⇒ ZC =

iωC Using these complex impedances we can just use our results for resistances earlier to solve circuits rather than solve differential equations.

4 Parallel Circuits

ZT

Z 1

Z 2

Z 3

RC Circuit

E 0 = I 0 ZT

ZT

R

1 /iωC

R

  • iωC = 1 + iωRC R ⇒ ZT =

R

1 + iωRC I 0 =

E 0

ZT

E 0

R

(1 + iωRC)

=

E 0

R

√ 1 + (ωRC)^2 exp i arctan(ωRC)

Note that the current through the resistor and capacitor will be different, it’s the voltage E 0 that will be the same. Hence

E 0 = IRR ⇒ IR =

E 0

R

and

E 0 = IC ZC = IC

iωC

⇒ IC =

E 0

ZC

= E 0 ıωC

Now Kirchoff’s first law still applies and as such we must have that

I 0 = IR + IC =

E 0

R

  • E 0 iωC = E 0

R

  • iωC

)

E 0

R

(1 + iωRC)

as before.