

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This handout is for Research methods course. It was provided by Sir Vishwamitra Neeraj at Ambedkar University, Delhi. This course explain issues in research, data analyse, sampling, research frame and design. This lecture handout includes: Tranformation, Colapsing, Objective, Vriable, Categories, Numeric, Summative, Raw, Interviews, Subtracting
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Lesson 30 DATA TRANSFROMATION
Data transformation is the process of changing data from their original form to a format that is more suitable to perform a data analysis that will achieve the research objectives. Researchers often modify thee values of a scalar data or create new variables. For example many researchers believe that response bias will be less if interviewers ask consumers for their year of birth rather than their age, even though the objective of the data analysis is to investigate respondents’ age in years. This does not present a problem for thee research analyst, because a simple data transformation is possible. The raw data coded at birth year can be easily transformed to age by subtracting the birth year from thee current year.
Collapsing or combining categories of a variable is a common data transformation that reduces the number of categories. For example five categories of Likert scale response categories to a question may be combined like: the “strongly agree” and the “agree” response categories are combined. The “strongly disagree” and the “disagree” response categories are combined into a single category. The result is the collapsing of the five-category scale down to three.
Creating new variables by re-specifying the data numeric or logical transformations is another important data transformation. For example, Likert summated scale reflect the combination of scores (raw data) from various attitudinal statements. The summative score for an attitude scale with three statements is calculated as follows: Summative Score = Variable 1 + Variable 2 + Variable 3
This calculation can be accomplished by using simple arithmetic or by programming a computer with a data transformation equation that creates the new variable “summative score.”
The researchers have created numerous different scales and indexes to measure social phenomenon. For example scales and indexes have been developed to measure the degree of formalization in bureaucratic organization, the prestige of occupations, the adjustment of people in marriage, the intensity of group interaction, thee level of social activity in a community, and thee level of socio-economic development of a nation.
Keep it in mind that every social phenomenon can be measured. Some constructs can be measured directly and produce precise numerical values (e.g. family income). Other constructs require the use of surrogates or proxies that indirectly measure a variable (e.g. job satisfaction). Second, a lot can be learned from measures used by other researchers. We are fortunate to have the work of thousands of researchers to draw on. It is not always necessary to start from a scratch. We can use a past scale or index, or we can modify it for our own purposes. The process of creating measures for a construct evolves over time. Measurement is an ongoing process with constant change; new concepts are developed, theoretical definitions are refined, and scales or indexes that measure old or new constructs are improved.
Indexes and Scales
Scales and indexes are often used interchangeably. One researcher’s scale is another’s index. Both produce ordinal- or interval- level measures of variable. To add to thee confusion, scale and index techniques can be combined in one measure. Scales and indexes give a researcher more information about variables and make it possible to assess thee quality of measurement. Scales and indexes increase reliability and validity, and they aid in data reduction; that is condense and simplify the information that is collected.
A scale is a measure in which the researcher captures the intensity, direction, level, or potency of a variable construct. It arranges responses or observation on a continuum. A scale can use single
An index is a measure in which a researcher adds or combines several distinct indicators of a construct into a single score. This composite score is often a simple sum of multiple indicators. It is used for content or convergent validity. Indexes are often measured at the interval or ratio level.
Researchers sometimes combine the features of scales and indexes in a single measure. This is common when a researcher has several indicators that are scales. He or she then adds these indicators together to yield a single score, thereby an index.
Unidimensionality: It means that al the items in a scale or index fit together, or measure a single construct. Unidimensionality says: If you combine several specific pieces of information into a single score or measure, have all the pieces measure the same thing. (each sub dimension is part of the construct’s overall content).
For example, we define the construct “feminist ideology” as a general ideology about gender. Feminist ideology is a highly abstract and general construct. It includes a specific beliefs and attitudes towards social, economic, political, family, sexual relations. The ideology’s five belief areas parts of a single general construct. The parts are mutually reinforcing and together form a system of beliefs about dignity, strength, and power of women.
Index Construction
You may have heard about a consumer price index (CPI). The CPI, which is a measure of inflation, is created by totaling the cost of buying a list of goods and services (e.g. food, rent, and utilities) and comparing the total to the cost of buying the same list in the previous year. An index is combination of items into a single numerical score. Various components or subgroups of a construct are each measured, and then combined into one measure.
There are many types of indexes. For example, if you take an exam with 25 questions, the total number of questions correct is a kind of index. It is a composite measure in which each question measures a small piece of knowledge, and all the questions scored correct or incorrect are totaled to produce a single measure.
One way to demonstrate that indexes are not a very complicated is to use one. Answer yes or no to the seven questions that follow on the characteristics of an occupation. Base your answers on your thoughts regarding the following four occupations: long-distance truck driver, medical doctor, accountant, telephone operator. Score each answer 1 for yes and 0 for no.
1. Does it pay good salary? 2. Is the job secure from layoffs or unemployment? 3. Is the work interesting and challenging? 4. Are its working conditions (e.g. hours, safety, time on the road) good? 5. Are there opportunities for career advancement and promotion? 6. Is it prestigious or looked up to by others? 7. Does it permit self-direction and thee freedom to make decisions?
Total the seven answers for each of the four occupations. Which had the highest and which had the lowest score? The seven questions are our operational definition of the construct good occupation. Each question represents a subpart of our theoretical definition.
Creating indexes is so easy that it is important to be careful that every item in the index has face validity. Items without face validity should be excluded. Each part of the construct should be measured with at least one indicator. Of course, it is better to measure the parts of a construct with multiple indicators.