Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An in-depth analysis of various capital budgeting decision models, including net present value (npv), profitability index (pi), internal rate of return (irr), and payback period. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each criterion, as well as project review and post-audit procedures. The document also touches upon real options and their impact on capital projects.
Typology: Slides
1 / 22
Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria and Real Options
This chapter looks at capital budgetingdecision models
It discusses and illustrates their relativestrengths and weaknesses - It examines project review and post-auditprocedures, and traces a sample projectthrough the capital budgeting process
Net present value
Profitability index
Internal rate of return
Payback period
Present value of the stream of future cashflows derived from a project minus theproject’s net investment 4
−
∑ Net CashFlows n t t t 1 NPV PV Net Investment Net Cash Flows NPV Net Investment 1 k Docsity.com
Characteristics of Net Present Value • Considers the time value of money
Absolute measure of wealth - Positive NPVs increase owner’s wealth - Negative NPVs decrease owner’s wealth - NPV not easily understood - Assumes that cash flows over the project’s lifecan be reinvested at the cost of capital, k - Does not consider the value of real options
Ratio of the present value of future cashflows over the life of the project to the netinvestment 6 ( ) =
= ∑ n t t t 1 Net Cash Flow 1 k PI Net Investment Docsity.com
Relative measure showing wealth increase perdollar of investment - Accept when PI > 1; reject when PI ≤ 1. - Considers the time value of money - Assumes cash flows are reinvested at k - If NPV and PI criteria disagree, with no capitalrationing, NPV is preferred - PI is preferred to NPV under capital rationing
Rate of discount (k) that equates the presentvalue of a project’s net cash flows with thepresent value of the net investment 8
n t t t 1 Net Cash Flow Net Inves k tment
Solve for this variable Docsity.com
If IRR > k , then the project is acceptable - Considers the time value of money - Unusual cash flow pattern can result in multipleIRRs - If NPV and IRR disagree, NPV is preferred. - If NPV > 0, IRR > k ; if NPV < 0, IRR < k - Assumes cash flows are reinvested at IRR. - Does not consider the value of real options
Number of years for the cumulative net cashflows from a project to equal the initial cashoutlay 10 = In Years Net Investment Pay Back Annual Net Cash Flow
Simple to use and easy to understand
Provides a measure of project liquidity - Provides a measure of project risk - Not a true measure of profitability - Ignores cash flows after the payback period - Ignores the time value of money - May lead to decisions that do not maximize shareholder wealth
Capital Budgeting Under Capital Rationing
Calculate the profitability index for projects - Order the projects from the highest to thelowest profitability index - Accept the projects with the highestprofitability index until the entire capitalbudget is spent
Search for another combination of projectsthat increases the NPV
Attempt to relax the funds constraint
Invest in short-term securities
Reduce outstanding debt - Pay a dividend
Find systematic biases or errors relating toprojected cash flows
Decide whether to abandon or continueprojects that have done poorly
Make sure the cost of capital takes account ofinflationary expectations
Make sure that future cash flow estimatesinclude expected price and cost increases
Investment timing option
Abandonment option - Shutdown options - Growth options - Design-in options
Foundation level of use of real optionsconcept
Increase awareness of value - Options can be created or destroyed - Think about risk and uncertainty - Value of acquiring additional information - Real options as an analytical tool - Option pricing models - Value the option characteristics of projects - Analyze various project opportunities
Find the present value of the foreign cashflows denominated in the foreign currencyand discounted at the foreign country’s costof capital.
Convert the present value of the cash flowsto the home country’s currency using thecurrent spot exchange rate. - Subtract the parent company’s netinvestment from the present value of the netcash flows to obtain the NPV.
Differential tax rates in different countries
Legal and political constraints on repatriatingcash flows - Government-subsidized loans may affect theWACC or discount rate
Principles are the same as for large firms
Discrepancies - Lack experience to implement procedures - Expertise stretched too thin - Cash shortages often require emphasis on paybackperiod
Four types of capital budgeting decisioncriteria:
NPV - Profitability Index - IRR - Payback Period - NPV is the preferred decision criteria whencapital is not constrained - Remember to think about real options