


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An overview of discrimination laws in australia, including the federal legislation (racial discrimination act 1975, sex discrimination act 1984, disability discrimination act 1992, and age discrimination act 2004) and victorian equal opportunity act 1995. It covers the concepts of direct and indirect discrimination, employment discrimination, harassment, and vilification. The document also discusses the application of these laws, the process for handling complaints, and examples of discrimination in various contexts.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Federal Legislation: Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (C’th) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (C’th) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (C’th) Age Discrimination Act 2004 (C’th)
Victorian Legislation: Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic)
Although both the federal legislation and the State legislation co-exist, the general rule is that the federal legislation prevails and applies where they both cover the same area.
1. Introduction Discrimination laws provide a person with a system of rights and remedies if they are affected by certain specified behaviour. The relevant legislation categorises such behaviour as unlawful and a breach of the civil law (not the criminal law and so there are no ‘criminal’ penalties).
Only those acts that fall within the various pieces of legislation are unlawful and hence not all discriminatory behaviour is unlawful.
Most Acts provide that both direct and indirect discrimination are prohibited.
All Acts provide a conciliation approach to dealing with complaints. In response to the complainer submitting a written complaint, an independent statutory body investigates and endeavours to resolve the complaint through confidential discussion and conciliation.
In the event that the complaint cannot be resolved by conciliation, the matter can be referred to a court or tribunal for an enforceable decision.
2. Direct Discrimination Most Acts have a similar definition of direct discrimination. In general terms direct discrimination involves one person, because of a particular characteristic they have (for example their racial group), being less favourably treated than someone who does not have that characteristic. Only those categories listed in the various Acts are covered, but characteristics that generally apply to persons of the nominated type are also covered (for example the characteristic of pregnant women is that they take maternity leave so it would be unlawful to discriminate on the basis of maternity leave). ‘Less favourable treatment’ requires a comparison between the treatment the person received and what they would have otherwise received.
There must be an identifiable causal link between the ground of discrimination and the action complained of. Tate v Rafin (2001) – no discrimination because cricket club committee did not know of the complainant’s disability Often there is no requirement to prove intention (to discriminate) or motive.
3. Indirect Discrimination Defining (and proving) indirect discrimination is complex. It is where the discriminator requires the aggrieved person (who has a listed characteristic) to comply with a requirement or condition a) with which a substantially higher proportion of persons without the characteristic comply or are able to comply; and b) which is not reasonable having regard to the circumstances of the case; and c) with which the aggrieved person does not or is not able to comply.
The definitions in all the Acts are not the same because of the difficulty in accurately stating what is meant. But all seemed to be aimed at the following meaning. Indirect discrimination involves a condition or requirement that on the face of it appears to apply neutrally and equally to everyone, but in fact disadvantages a particular group, for instance women.
Examples: