Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A comprehensive guide for English students on how to write persuasive discursive essays. It covers the differences between persuasive and argumentative writing, choosing a topic, preparing to write, and various types of evidence. It also includes examples of counter-arguments and sentence structures.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 16
Argumentative
Persuasive
It must be: Controversial and open to debate Topical and worth writing about now Interesting to you and the reader Original and not an overdone topic Allows you to research and develop deep knowledge and genuine insight 3
“What are you actually trying to persuade the reader of?” This is the feedback most frequently written on first drafts. Don’t make the same mistake! Have a clear stance before you write. A stance is the overall position that you will take/argue in the piece. Make your stance a statement, not a question.
The second most common feedback given to students is: “your line of argument is weak”. This usually means the points have not been planned out. Points are the arguments or opinions you will put forward to support your stance. They should be written as brief statements when planning (not questions) Your points should flow logically, linking together, each building on the last, to lead towards your conclusion.
Counter-arguments are the arguments that your opponents would make. When planning your points, imagine a little demon on your shoulder saying: “Ah, but…” or “hang on, what about…” If you can see there’s an obvious counter-argument, so will your reader. You must acknowledge the arguments to show you’ve thought about the issue form all sides. However, you should knock down and undermine the counter-arguments that you acknowledge Be selective: don’t include all possible counter-arguments just the most obvious and important ones. Remember, you points should outweigh the counter-arguments.
EXAMPLE STANCE: We should scrap the 1p coin. 6
This is information that backs up or emphasise your points. You should use a variety of types of evidence. Don’t include any evidence supporting counter- arguments, only your points.
The web links for the websites where you find your evidence should be written down in your bibliography. You should keep a note of these during the planning process as it will save you a lot of time an effort later on. You should also write down the date you accessed the information. Bibliography Author of website, Name of website, URL, [Accessed: give date] Footnotes Footnotes are used to help the reader work out where particular pieces of evidence came from.
Generate ideas
Write stance
Brainstorm initial points
Research supporting evidence
Write a skeleton plan
Introduction The introduction should hook the reader’s interest and be stylish. *Start with humour *Start with a fact/story designed to shock/anger *Start with an illustrative anecdote/story which introduces your essay’s theme, but which is not directly related to your specific topic. *Start with a quotation/expert opinion It should also introduce the topic and make clear why the reader should care about it. *Show the issue is topical/contemporary/of the moment *Show it affects everyone/‘us all’/the reader *Show that the issue has been ignored/or is going unnoticed/under-the- radar/deserves attention *Show that the issue is of wider historical importance/has a long history/wide-ranging consequences *Show it is of intense personal significance to you Finally, it should outline your stance. *Show your stance through tone, word choice and ideas. Avoid explicitly stating “I am going to argue…” or “I believe that…” The reader should be able to work your stance out themselves without being told. 10
*Don’t use a rhetorical question to introduce your topic. *Don’t go into specific details about particular points or evidence - keep it broad. *Don’t be wishy-washy by saying things like :”This is a topic about which there are many different opinions on both sides.” *Avoid the first person unless you are deliberately using a personal anecdote or conversational tone. *Don’t talk about your own essay (“In this essay I’m going to…”)
historic, monumental, inspirational, liberated, innocent, adored, sanctuary, idyllic, homely, cosy, joyous... Words are your tools. Choose the right tools for the job. government regime economic savings spending cuts changing manipulating freedom fighter terrorist injure maim / disfigure killed slaughtered detained banged up economic downturn crash / recession focused crash blinkered/bloody- minded remove abolish / destroy
Simple sentences and minor sentences “It is barbaric. It must be stopped. Now.” “A face so handsome. A voice so smooth. Ah, my hero!” “Yeah. Ok. Whatever you say.” Compound sentences using conjunctions “I have faith in our nation because history has shown that good usually triumphs over evil in these situations.” “The evidence was unclear yet the decision went ahead.” “The consequences will affect not just you and me and our children and our grandchildren, but the rest of mankind.” Short sentence after a long one “My daughter – despite owning many dolls and books about ballerinas, many shiny and sparkly garments and other glittery, stereotypically girlish fare – would much rather build a skyscraper out of Legos or read about how to expand her game play on the coding app Hopscotch. And I, for one, couldn’t be happier about it.” Single sentence paragraph Sentential adverbs (a single word or phrase that interrupts the sentence for emphasis) “But the weapons did not, in fact, exist. The evidence was, without doubt, a fabrication. In short, we were tricked.”
Imagery Use of similes, metaphors, personification. “If we are all soldiers in the war against drugs, we can force the army of drug pushers into retreat.” Parenthesis Interrupting a sentence to insert a further explanation or aside in dashes or brackets. Triple Statements sound more powerful when put in threes. “An increase in the numbers of policemen will lead to safer streets, safer cities and a safer society.” Repetition These questions focus the reader to think about where they stand and hopefully agree with the point you’re making. Use them sparingly and at a place were it is likely they will agree. “Surely displaying respect to all faiths in ‘The Land of the Free’ is the perfect retort to the intolerance, violence and limited world view of the jihadists?” Hyperbole/Exaggeration Overstating can be effective in creating humour while illustrating flaws in the opposing argument. “While having a fleet of new and shiny massive aircraft carriers to sail around the world’s island or coastal hotspots is all well and good, we cannot have this at the expense of soldiers in Afghanistan making do with old tin trays in their Land Rovers as protection against road side bombs.”
Consider these phrases which all mean the same: The same fact can be presented from the opposite side: “20% of people think X” “80% of people think Y” “A fifth of the population think X.” “Four out of five people think Y.” “One in five people think X.” “Only two in ten people think X.” “An overwhelming majority of people believe Y.” “Less than a quarter of the population think X.” “Four times as many people think Y compared to X.”
The conclusion is the climax of your whole argument. It’s where all of your points have been leading. You should: *draw your points together into a final overview of the situation/issue *step back from the individual details and place the whole issue back in its wider context *consider the future: what will happen? Where are we headed? What should happen? The conclusion is also the culmination of careful consideration and logical thought. *Essays that start and end with exactly the same ideas come across as simplistic, basic, limited. *A good conclusion shows that your exploration of the issue has led to a more refined stance. *A good way to show this is to create a^ circular structure -^ return to an idea/image/detail from the start of your essay and show it in a different light. Finally, the conclusion is the last thing the marker will see - it should be memorable.
When asked to redraft your piece, you should do a lot more than just correct spellings and only fix what the teacher has marked; you should reflect on feedback, act on suggestions, experiment, rewrite, develop, extend , improve, refine… Don’t expect to redraft in one sitting. Redraft a little bit, leave it a few days, redraft some more, leave it a few days, redraft some more… The more often you look at your essay ‘with fresh eyes’, the better. Read your piece out to an audience is you can. If they can’t follow your argument, you may need to improve your clarity, linking sentences or line of argument.