Electoral Integrity Essay, Essays (high school) of Political studies

Essay answers a question about electoral integrity.

Typology: Essays (high school)

2017/2018

Uploaded on 09/28/2021

Elise333
Elise333 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1. What are four determinants of electoral integrity? Describe the effect of each.
In a world of increasing government elections, electoral integrity is more important now
than ever before. The conduct of elections needs to be appropriate and moral, meeting standards
of fairness. After all, if an election is not fair, then how can a country expect its next rulers to
bring fair policies? The Electoral Integrity Project run by Pippa Norris indicates multiple factors
that go into electoral integrity. Four huge determinants are structural constraints within a country,
the level of international integration, institutional design and electoral management bodies.
The structural constraints imposed on a country can drastically affect electoral integrity.
The wealth of a country, its dependence on natural resources, tendency for conflict, and poor
geographic location are all factors that can make or break a proper election process. A poor
country that can’t handle the costs of an election will not execute it as well as a wealthier country
will. A wealthier country has more resources to devote to an election and has more opportunities
to persuade the country with that wealth. If a country depends on natural resources, the
incumbent or other ruling elites have the ability to manipulate elections through means of
suppressing and intimidating opponents. A country with deep levels of mistrust and a tendency
for violence can hinder the justness of an election. And finally, difficult-to-reach countries can
cause financial, technical, and other difficulties during an election. Any number of these
constraints can cause major damage to elections and result in malpractice.
The international relationships a country has can also be important. Regional
governmental organizations such as the European Union provide incentives for elections to
respect inherent rights and produce fair elections to keep good relationships. Without the
watchful eye of alliances or a liberal organization, lone countries or countries in a more
authoritarian group do not have the incentive to be moral in elections. Additionally, developing
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Electoral Integrity Essay and more Essays (high school) Political studies in PDF only on Docsity!

  1. What are four determinants of electoral integrity? Describe the effect of each. In a world of increasing government elections, electoral integrity is more important now than ever before. The conduct of elections needs to be appropriate and moral, meeting standards of fairness. After all, if an election is not fair, then how can a country expect its next rulers to bring fair policies? The Electoral Integrity Project run by Pippa Norris indicates multiple factors that go into electoral integrity. Four huge determinants are structural constraints within a country, the level of international integration, institutional design and electoral management bodies. The structural constraints imposed on a country can drastically affect electoral integrity. The wealth of a country, its dependence on natural resources, tendency for conflict, and poor geographic location are all factors that can make or break a proper election process. A poor country that can’t handle the costs of an election will not execute it as well as a wealthier country will. A wealthier country has more resources to devote to an election and has more opportunities to persuade the country with that wealth. If a country depends on natural resources, the incumbent or other ruling elites have the ability to manipulate elections through means of suppressing and intimidating opponents. A country with deep levels of mistrust and a tendency for violence can hinder the justness of an election. And finally, difficult-to-reach countries can cause financial, technical, and other difficulties during an election. Any number of these constraints can cause major damage to elections and result in malpractice. The international relationships a country has can also be important. Regional governmental organizations such as the European Union provide incentives for elections to respect inherent rights and produce fair elections to keep good relationships. Without the watchful eye of alliances or a liberal organization, lone countries or countries in a more authoritarian group do not have the incentive to be moral in elections. Additionally, developing

and poor countries often receive financial aid from multiple international organizations and other countries. While this can mean more resources for a country’s election, it can also mean that the donor country has more of an influence on the election’s results. This is obviously unfair and brings electoral malpractice. Therefore, international integration can either be fruitful for electoral integrity or bring more issues to the table. The institutional design of a country is yet another determinant of electoral integrity. If a country spreads the power of its government to multiple facets, there is a certain checks and balances result that will limit the ability of electoral malpractice. Incumbents cannot abuse power if they do not hold it all. There is a chance of less responsibility in a power-sharing institution, but there might not need to be a reason to hold a leader accountable if they do not have the initial power to change something completely. If a country instead yields to the majority, there are more possibilities for corruption. That leader can be held solely accountable, but by who? If the majority agrees with that leader, there will be no consequences anyway. Overall, the way a country is set up in terms of its spread of power can affect an election’s fairness and accountability. The final most important determinant is electoral management bodies. The authorities in charge of administering elections must not be tied to the executive. Electoral management bodies need to be independent and have the capacity to hold a fair election. If the management does not have the technical expertise, training, budgets and more that will increase the quality of the election, the election stands in danger of not being done correctly or justly. Electoral integrity is necessary for the election process. Many factors can impact electoral integrity, including structural constraints, international integration, institutional design, and electoral management bodies.