EPIVILLE SARS COMMUNITY OUTBREAK, Exercises of Nursing

EPIVILLE SARS COMMUNITY OUTBREAK EPIVILLE SARS COMMUNITY OUTBREAK EPIVILLE SARS COMMUNITY OUTBREAK

Typology: Exercises

2023/2024

Available from 03/21/2024

docati-ati
docati-ati ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

1.5K documents

1 / 36

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24

Partial preview of the text

Download EPIVILLE SARS COMMUNITY OUTBREAK and more Exercises Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!

OUTLINE

  • BACKGROUND OF THE EPIVILLE SARS

OUTBREAK

  • CASE DEFINITION AND KEY FACTORS
  • SUMMARY OF TECHNIQUES OF

INVESTIGATION

  • DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE CONTROL

STUDY DESIGN ANALYSIS

  • MANAGING THE EPIVILLE SARS

OUTBREAK

  • PRESENTATION SUMMARY

o (^) The Amoy Apartment Complex, is the determined as primary outbreak source outbreak center

Case Definition and Key factors

Clinical Criteria

  • (^) Symptoms

โžข (^) Fever above 100.4, cough, shortness of breath, and difficulty breathing

  • (^) Exposure

โžข (^) Has been in contact with another SARS identified patient

Case Distrubution

โžข (^) All residents, living in the Amoy Apartment Complex, in the timeframes from August 3rd-August 24th

KEY FACTORS WHEN DEVELOPING A CASE

DEFINITION

  • (^) A case definition needs to be created before data collection begins
  • (^) Criteria is used to determine if a patient does or does not have the disease
  • (^) Based on specific symptoms identified during the evaluation of each case
  • (^) Cases must match according to person, place, and time (PPT)
  • (^) This criteria helps to determine if candidates will be included within thecase

study

Epiville SARS Outbreak in terms of person, place, and

time (PPT)

PERSON

โ‘ (^) The people being

impacted in Epiville were in different age groups

โ‘ (^) Ranging from 3

years to 60 years and more

PLACE โ‘ (^) The common place of transmission was within the Amoy Apartment Complex โ‘ (^) One patient exposedat above location, exposed staff at Star Hospital

TIME โ‘ (^) Exposure noted, 300 tenants attended the Annual Luau at the Amoy Apartment Complex โ‘ (^) Time curve

โ‘ (^) Evaluation of a time frame

Techniques Used for Investigation

  • (^) Passive surveillance is ongoing and requires facilitiesto report designated illness and diseases
  • (^) Active surveillance requires

more interviews, calls, and in

person screening techniques

Determining if cases meet the case definition for

suspect cases or probable cases

SUSPECT CASES

Identified by symptoms defined in the

case definition

  • (^) Fever above 100.4F
  • (^) Cough, shortness of breath, or respiratory issues
  • (^) Exposure to anyone at the Amoy Apartment Complex

Epiville had 70 suspected case

ModeofTransmission

Amoy Apartment Complex

  • (^) Direct person to person
  • (^) Primary residence for the majority of cases
  • (^) Luau, was one community event that most patients had either attended or been exposed to someone who attended

Star Hospital

  • (^) Direct person to person
  • (^) One patient, 70 year old man, fromthe

Amoy Apartment Complex Luau

  • (^) Then a nurse and doctor became

sick

  • (^) 20 additional staff members had

direct contact and became ill

Process for Creating aWorking Hypothesis

  • (^) Investigating the cases located at the hospital
  • (^) Determining mode of transmission
  • (^) How and where did the epidemic originate from
  • (^) Utilizing existing knowledge of the suspected disease
  • (^) Comparison to other unknown causes
  • (^) Creating a case definition
  • (^) Developing lists and a spot map to determine case locations of outbreak
  • (^) Creating outbreak management

Identifying the disease โœ“ (^) Testing methods โœ“ (^) Investigating links between each case โœ“ (^) Comparison of symptoms โœ“ (^) Screening

Process to determine themode of transmission โœ“ (^) Determine if the mode is indirect or direct โœ“ (^) Using similarities between symptoms and PPT โœ“ (^) Direct contact is determined by the trend of exposure and the amount of primary and secondary cases

70/53,000= 0.0013207547169811 then multiply by 1,000= 1.320754716981132, which rounds out to

1.32 per 1,000 in three-week timeframe

  • (^) The selected type of study is a case-control

study

  • (^) Benefits include less time required to

perform and less expenses

  • (^) It allows for monitoring of treatment and

prevention

  • (^) Used frequently in the medical field, effective

with studying of disease processes

Study Design Analysis

EPIDEMIC CURVE FOR EPIVILLE

SARS OUTBREAK

THE INCUBATION PERIOD AND THEIMPORTANCE

  • (^) The exposure date was on August 1st^ at the Luau
  • (^) Incubation period can range from 2-20 days
  • (^) Cases from the Amoy Apartment have incubation periods from 2-12 days
  • (^) The Star Hospital patient became symptomatic and hospitalized on August 3rd, 2 days after Luau
  • (^) The Star hospital staff began showing symptomsat day 7
  • (^) It is important to be able to see both the primary attack incubation in comparison to the secondary attack incubation