




















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
According to ethical egoism, however, we have no duties to others; in fact, each person ought to pursue his or her own selfish interests exclusively
Typology: Slides
1 / 28
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!





















Is there a duty to help starving people?
o Over 5,200 children under the age of five die every
day from dehydration brought on by diarrhea – 1.
million per year ( and 9.7 million if death by other
preventable causes is included ).
What kind of duties do we have?
Common sense might tell us to balance our own
interests against the interests of others.
The interests of others
The needs of others are also deemed important, and
when we can help others—especially at little cost to
ourselves—we sense that we should do so.
This is based on the assumption
that we have duties to others
simply because they are people
who could be helped or harmed
by what we do.
Psychological Egoism
Often confused with ethical egoism, yet quite distinct
—because it is not a moral theory.
Psychological egoism is a
theory of human psychology
and asserts that each person
does in fact pursue his or
her own self-interest alone.
Is altruism possible?
People do favors for one another.
They give blood.
They build homeless shelters.
They volunteer in hospitals.
They read to the blind.
Etc.
The Argument that We Always Do What We Want to
Do
The Argument that We Always Do What We Want to
Do
! (^) This is a flawed argument.
There are things we do, not simply because we want
to, but because we feel that we ought to.
The mere fact that you act on
your own desires does not
mean that you are primarily
looking out for yourself; it all
depends on what you desire.
If what you want is to help
someone else, then your
motive is altruistic , not self-
interested.
The Argument that We Always Do What Makes Us Feel
Good
! (^) This argument is likewise badly flawed.
The fact that one has a self-interested motive doesn’t
mean that one doesn’t have benevolent motives as well.
If I see a child drowning, my desire to help that child
will usually be greater than my desire to avoid a guilty
conscience.
The Argument that We Always Do What Makes Us Feel
Good
Ethical Egoism
Ethical egoism is the radical idea that the principle of
self-interest accounts for all of one’s moral obligations.
Sometimes one’s interests may happen to coincide with
the interests of others—in that by helping oneself, one
will coincidentally help them, too.
The benefit to others is not what
makes an action right , however.
An action is right only insofar as it
is to one’s own ‘advantage.’
Ethical Egoism
A person ought to do what
really is in his or her best
interests, over the long run.
The argument is that since:
o each person has one life to live, AND
o altruism rejects the value of the individual, WHEREAS
o ethical egoism views the individual’s life as having supreme
value,
then ethical egoism is the moral
philosophy we ought to accept.
Ethical egoism claims that all our commonsense moral
views regarding duties are ultimately derived from the
one fundamental principle of self-interest.
It is to our own advantage to avoid harming others.
Otherwise, they might harm us.
It is to our own advantage to be truthful. Otherwise, others
may be dishonest to us.
It is to our own advantage to keep
our promises. Otherwise, others may
break their promises to us.