Factor Analysis Exercise for Community Coalitions: Identifying Factors from Survey Data - , Study notes of Geriatrics

An exercise on factor analysis using data from a survey conducted among community leaders to assess various aspects of coalition function and performance. The exercise includes scales from the survey, results of the factor analysis, and questions to answer based on the analysis. Students will learn how to identify the number of factors, label new variables, and interpret factor loadings.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 11/08/2009

koofers-user-l57
koofers-user-l57 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

5

(1)

9 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Class Exercice on Factor Analysis
PM 536/ October 6, 2005
In a recent study, Pentz, Valente and colleagues have investigator how community coalitions
function to deliver evidence based substance abuse prevention programs at the community level.
Part of the survey administered to over 600 community leaders in 24 communities assessed
various aspects of coalition function and performance. Below are 2 scales from the survey and
the results of the factor analysis are on the following pages. Please answer the following
questions:
Questions Answers
Do any items need to
be reverse coded? If so,
which ones?
What are values for the
eigenvalues?
How many variables/
scales should be
constructed from these
data and why?
What variables should
be combined and why?
How would you create
new variables?
What factor loading
threshold seems
reasonable?
Label the new
variables:
How well does Q15c
load on factor 1?
How well does Q15c
load on factor 2?
Which items are most
indicative of factors 1
and 2 and why?
Which items should be
dropped?
What effect does
missing data have on
this analysis?
(1)
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Factor Analysis Exercise for Community Coalitions: Identifying Factors from Survey Data - and more Study notes Geriatrics in PDF only on Docsity!

Class Exercice on Factor Analysis

PM 536/ October 6, 2005

In a recent study, Pentz, Valente and colleagues have investigator how community coalitions

function to deliver evidence based substance abuse prevention programs at the community level.

Part of the survey administered to over 600 community leaders in 24 communities assessed

various aspects of coalition function and performance. Below are 2 scales from the survey and

the results of the factor analysis are on the following pages. Please answer the following

questions:

Questions Answers

Do any items need to

be reverse coded? If so,

which ones?

What are values for the

eigenvalues?

How many variables/

scales should be

constructed from these

data and why?

What variables should

be combined and why?

How would you create

new variables?

What factor loading

threshold seems

reasonable?

Label the new

variables:

How well does Q15c

load on factor 1?

How well does Q15c

load on factor 2?

Which items are most

indicative of factors 1

and 2 and why?

Which items should be

dropped?

What effect does

missing data have on

this analysis?

15. How much do you agree or

disagree with each of these

statements about how the

community organization works

most of the time:

Strongly

Disagree Disagree

Neither

Agree Nor

Disagree Agree

Strongly

Agree

Donโ€™t

Know

a. Everyone is involved in discussion,

not just a few. 1

b. The community organization is

organized and efficient.

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”^6 ๏‚”

c. The leader usually has control of

meetings.

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”^6 ๏‚”

d. The group is able to move from talk

to action.

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”^6 ๏‚”

e. The community organization uses

the abilities of all, not just a few. 1

17. How much has each of these influenced your

communityโ€™s choice of current prevention activities

and providers?

Not

at All

A

Little Some

A

Lot

Donโ€™t

Know

a. Analysis of local needs, based on data your

community collected

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”

b. Data on risk and protective factors 1 ๏‚” 2 ๏‚” 3 ๏‚” 4 ๏‚” 5 ๏‚”

c. Review of research on effective programs to identify

those that might work for your community

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”

d. Funding available for particular programs or activities 1 ๏‚” 2 ๏‚” 3 ๏‚” 4 ๏‚” 5 ๏‚”

e. Data showing that some neighborhoods needed more

activities

1 ๏‚”^2 ๏‚”^3 ๏‚”^4 ๏‚”^5 ๏‚”

f. A desire to support existing prevention programs 1 ๏‚” 2 ๏‚” 3 ๏‚” 4 ๏‚” 5 ๏‚”

g. A mandate from the state or a state agency 1 ๏‚” 2 ๏‚” 3 ๏‚” 4 ๏‚” 5 ๏‚”

h. Recommendations from community residents, leaders,

or coalition members 1

i. A significant community event, such as the death of a

young person in an alcohol-related accident 1

. rotate (varimax rotation) Rotated Factor Loadings Variable | 1 2 Uniqueness -------------+-------------------------------- q15a | 0.67420 0.14287 0. q15b | 0.76424 0.24776 0. q15c | 0.60488 0.14673 0. q15d | 0.80063 0.23348 0. q15e | 0.72877 0.16556 0. q17a | 0.29082 0.72106 0. q17b | 0.31925 0.72508 0. q17c | 0.18743 0.69259 0. q17d | 0.21344 0.53726 0. q17e | 0.08044 0.58735 0. q17f | 0.35735 0.43162 0. q17g | 0.02829 0.33435 0. q17h | 0.22121 0.50084 0. q17i | -0.16744 0.10774 0.