FPT UNIVERSITY- CAMPUS HO CHI MINH
GROUP ASSIGNMENT [MGT103]
TOPIC:………………….
Course: MGT103
Group members:
Name of group member
Code
Contribution
(%)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, …./2024
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Guidelines and tips
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Group Assignment Report, Schemes and Mind Maps of Management Fundamentals
This group project is designed to help students develop their critical thinking and analysis skills in the context of real-world management issues. Students will analyze a management topic in groups by selecting a company and developing recommendations for how the company can address the issue. The report should include a prefatory section with a title page, acknowledgement, abstract/executive summary, table of contents, and list of figures and tables. The body of the report should present a logical argument that supports the main theme or proposition, with references to relevant theories and concepts. The supplemental section should include a references list and appendices. The report will be evaluated based on criteria such as the identification of main issues/problems, discussion of issues, relation to theories/concepts, provision of appropriate solutions, and writing skills.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
2023/2024
1 / 9
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Related documents
Partial preview of the text
Download Group Assignment Report and more Schemes and Mind Maps Management Fundamentals in PDF only on Docsity!
FPT UNIVERSITY- CAMPUS HO CHI MINH
GROUP ASSIGNMENT [MGT103]
TOPIC:………………….
Course: MGT
Group members: Name of group member Code Contribution (%)
Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, …./202 4
- HOW TO INSERT A TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
- ASSIGNMENT: GROUP RESEARCH REPORT
- Important:
- Referencing:
- Format:
- REPORT STRUCTURE:
- Prefatory Section
- Body/Text
- Supplemental
- MARKING CRITERIA
- Group Report (60%)
- In-Class Presentation (40%)
ASSIGNMENT: GROUP RESEARCH REPORT
VALUE: 20%
(Weight on report : 60% + Weight on report presentation : 40%) WORD LIMIT: 4,000 words + Reference list + Appendix DUE DATE: 17 / 06 /202 4 Late submission (-10% for each day late without written approval) FORMAT: Academic report: headings and sections but no numbering Overview: This group project is designed to help you develop your critical thinking and analysis skills in the context of real-world management issues. You will analyse a management topic in groups by selecting a company and developing recommendations for how the company can address the issue. Management Topics: To complete your group assignment, your group will be randomly assigned a specific management topic to analyze. Once the topics are known, choose a company that is presently experiencing a management issue related to that topic. Investigate the problem thoroughly and identify the company's key issues and challenges as a consequence of this problem. Specifically, your groups will be assigned one of the following topics:
- Corporate-level strategy/Business-level strategy (Chapter 3)
- Decision making (Chapter 4)
- Organization structure and design (Chapter 6)
- Human resources management (Chapter 8 )
- Motivation (Chapter 1 0 )
- Leadership (Chapter 11)
- Operational efficiency or productivity (Chapter 14 & 15) Important:
- Sources of information must be consistently and comprehensively referenced throughout the report.
- At least six high quality professional, company or media sources should be used.
- It is not sufficient just to repeat information from single sources such as, book, journal.
- Plagiarism is taken very seriously in this course. To avoid plagiarism, you should first
read and follow while writing paper: https://www.scribbr.com/category/plagiarism/
- In addition to secondary research, it is recommended that you should conduct an interview with a middle- or upper-level manager of the chosen company in order to get more insights about his/her company and issues/problems facing. The interviewee’s opinions/ideas should be mentioned/reported in the report. **Referencing:
- Papers with incorrect referencing will receive no more than a 6.0 grade**
- Papers with no citations will receive no more than a 4.5 grade.
- Papers with no in-text citations or no reference list at the end of the assignment will receive no more than a 4.5 grade.
- You must make reference to at least 6 sources.
- Any referencing styles are accepted. However, be consistent throughout the paper!
- Footnotes must not be used as a referencing style.
- Wikipedia is not to be used as a reference. Format:
- Typed and double-spaced
- Font: Times New Roman, Size: 11
- File should be saved as PDF and submitted to LMS. REPORT STRUCTURE: In general, following points are to be noted in preparing your report: Prefatory Section
- This states information that identifies and introduces the report to the reader. It tells the reader what to expect. Five common parts of the prefatory section are:
- Title Page
- Acknowledgement
- Abstract/Executive Summary
- Table of Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
General points about the report
- You can use headings, but use them sparingly. Headings only add value if they assist the reader in following the logical argument.
- Poor spelling and grammar detract from your ability to build an argument. CHECK BOTH GRAMMAR AND SPELLING THOUROUGHLY.
MARKING CRITERIA
Group Report (60%)
Criteria Mark Poor (1) Moderate (2) Satisfactory (3) Good (4) Excellent (5) Introduction 1 Introduction is not interesting Introduction is less interesting Introduction is appropriately interesting Interesting introduction Very interesting introduction Identification of Main Issues/ Problems 1.5 Unable to identify and understand the issues in case study (organization) Able to slightly identify and understand the issues in the case study (organization) Able to identify and understand some of the issues in the case study (organization) Able to identify and understand most of the issues in case study (organization) Able to identify and understand all of the main issues in the case study (organization) Discussion of Issues 2 No discussion of issues Moderate discussion of issues Relevant discussion of some of the issues in the case (organization) Complete but not thorough discussion of the issues Insightful and thorough discussion of all the issues Relate to theories / concepts 1.5 No effort to relate to theories / concepts Inadequate efforts to relate to theories / concepts adequate adaptation to theories / concepts Significant adaptation to relate to theories / concepts Exceptional adaptation to relate to theories / concepts Provide suggestions on appropriate solutions 1.5 No solutions Inadequate solutions Adequate solutions Relevant Solutions Well-thought and highly relevant solutions Conclusion 0.5 Absolutely lack of the main results of the study Too long, but do not focus on the main results of the study Brief, concise and outlined the results of study In short, quite focused on the results of study Focused on the results of study Writing skills (Organization, Grammars, Spelling, References) 2 The assignment was poorly organized and lacked supporting evidence Too many grammatical errors The organization of the paper was somewhat organized with minimal supporting evidence Numerous grammatical errors The organization of the paper was generally acceptable with some supporting evidence Several grammatical errors The organization of the paper was well organized and supports Few grammatical errors The paper was very well organized and supports No grammatical errors Total 10