Health webcast reflection, Summaries of Biology

it is a health nutrient webcast reflection

Typology: Summaries

2022/2023

Uploaded on 05/05/2023

akshitaa-pandey
akshitaa-pandey 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Criteria:
1. Category 1: Originality
Exceeding
Proficient
Developing
Beginning
Newscast showed a large
amount of original
thought. Ideas were
creative and inventive.
4 points
Newscast showed
some original
thought. Work
showed new ideas
and insights.
3 points
Newscast showed
little evidence of
original thinking.
2 points
Newscast used other
people’s ideas.
0 points
Score yourself and explain:
2. Category 2: Interesting/Appropriate
Exceeding
Proficient
Developing
Beginning
Newscast was
appropriate for the
audience and was
extremely interesting.
4 points
Newscast was
appropriate for the
audience, but not
extremely
interesting.
3 points
Newscast was either
appropriate or
interesting, but not
both.
2 points
Newscast was
neither appropriate
for the audience nor
interesting.
0 points
Score yourself and explain:
3.Category 3: Clear Message
Exceeding
Proficient
Developing
Beginning
The health-enhancing
message was
extremely clear.
4 points
The health-enhancing
message was clear.
3 points
The health-enhancing
message was
somewhat clear.
2 points
The health-enhancing
message was unclear.
0 points
Score yourself and explain:
4. Category 4: Content
Exceeding
Proficient
Developing
Beginning
Newscast included all
required information,
and all information was
accurate and relevant.
Newscast included
the required
information, but one
piece was not
accurate or relevant.
Newscast included
most of the required
information, and/or
there were multiple
examples of
Newscast was
missing key required
information.
0 points
Points : 2.5 ; The ppt we m ade was nice and cre ative but the v ideo mak ing was not that
creative s inc e we didn’t have one of our group membe rs.
Points : 4 ; i fo und t he information very i nterest ing and i le ar ned a lot. Since i learned a lot i
thi nk o ther pe ople will also le ar n from our presentation.
Points : 4 ; th e mes sage was clear because we tr ied to expl ain it in s imple terms and didn’t
add a lo t of scientific ter ms th at e veryo ne might not know.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Health webcast reflection and more Summaries Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

Criteria:

1. Category 1: Originality

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning Newscast showed a large amount of original thought. Ideas were creative and inventive. 4 points

Newscast showed some original thought. Work showed new ideas and insights. 3 points

Newscast showed little evidence of original thinking. 2 points

Newscast used other people’s ideas. 0 points

Score yourself and explain:

2. Category 2: Interesting/Appropriate

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning Newscast was appropriate for the audience and was extremely interesting. 4 points

Newscast was appropriate for the audience, but not extremely interesting. 3 points

Newscast was either appropriate or interesting, but not both. 2 points

Newscast was neither appropriate for the audience nor interesting. 0 points

Score yourself and explain:

3 .Category 3: Clear Message

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning The health-enhancing message was extremely clear. 4 points

The health-enhancing message was clear. 3 points

The health-enhancing message was somewhat clear. 2 points

The health-enhancing message was unclear. 0 points

Score yourself and explain:

4. Category 4: Content

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning Newscast included all required information, and all information was accurate and relevant.

Newscast included the required information, but one piece was not accurate or relevant.

Newscast included most of the required information, and/or there were multiple examples of

Newscast was missing key required information. 0 points

Points : 2.5 ; The ppt we made was nice and creative but the video making was not that

creative since we didn’t have one of our group members.

Points : 4 ; i found the information very interesting and i learned a lot. Since i learned a lot i

think other people will also learn from our presentation.

Points : 4 ; the message was clear because we tried to explain it in simple terms and didn’t

add a lot of scientific terms that everyone might not know.

4 points 3 points information that was not accurate or relevant. 2 points

Score yourself and explain:

5. Category 5: Organization

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning Content was extremely well organized. 4 points

Content was well organized. 3 points

Content was somewhat organized. 2 points

There was no clear or logical organization, just lots of facts. 0 points

Score yourself and explain:

6. Category 6: Presentation

Exceeding Proficient Developing Beginning Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that the audience could understand. 4 points

Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that the audience could for the most part understand. 3 points

Delivery was not smooth, but was able to hold audience attention most of the time. 2 points

Delivery was not smooth, and audience attention was lost. 1 points

Score yourself and explain:

Points : 4 ; we included all the information and double checked with the instructions

Points : 4 ; we used PowerPoint to organize the information and added tons of pictures too help

our audience understand

Points : 4 ; i tried to speak as clearly as i could and so did my group so i think we did a good job at

delivering