Higher Algebra 8, Exercises - Mathematics, Exercises of Algebra

Baer multiplication, abelian group, commutative field, anti-involution map,k-vector subspace, bilinear form, Brauer-Severi variety.

Typology: Exercises

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/11/2011

jamal33
jamal33 🇺🇸

4.3

(51)

340 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 250a: Higher Algebra
Problem Set #9 (6 December 2004):
Quaternion algebras
A bit more about Baer multiplication:
1. Let Abe an abelian group and Gany group acting on A. For any extension
1Aι
Eπ
G1 consistent with this action, let Eobe the extension
1Aι
Eπ
G1 with the opposite embedding of Ain E. [Why do
E, E ohave the same G-action on A?] Prove that Eois the inverse of Ein
two ways: by identifying (E, E o)/Q with the semidirect product AoG,
and by showing that E, Eocorrespond to inverse elements of H2(G, A).
Note that the formula for Eois what one might expect from the special case
(G, A) = (Gal(L/k), L) and our results about the opposite of a central simple
algebra.
In the next two problems, we describe generalized quaternion algebras over an
arbitrary field knot of characteristic 2.
2. i) For any (commutative) field k, define a map x7→ ¯xon M2(k) by ¯x=
Tr(x)·1x. Here Tr(x) is the trace of xas a 2 ×2 matrix, and 1is
the 2 ×2 identity matrix, which is the unit element of M2(k). Prove that
this map is an anti-involution, i.e., that it satisfies the identities ¯
¯x=x
and xy = ¯y¯x. [This can be done either by explicit computation or via a
relation between ¯xand the transpose of x.]
ii) Now suppose that A/k is any central simple algebra with dimkA= 4.
Define a map x7→ ¯xon Aby ¯x= Tr(x)·1x, where Tr(x) is the reduced
trace of xand 1 is the unit element of A. Prove that this map is an
anti-involution.
Let A0be the kernel of Tr; it is a k-vector subspace of Aof dimension 4 1 = 3.
Let N:Akbe the reduced norm, so N(x) = x¯x. This is a quadratic form
on A, and the associated bilinear form is
(x, y) = N(x+y)N(x)N(y) = x¯y+y¯x= Tr(x¯y).
Note that if xA0then N(x) = x2.
3. i) Prove that if x, y A0with N(x) = N(y)6= 0 then x, y are conjugate
in A.
ii) Prove that there exist iA0with N(i) nonzero. Fix one such i, and
let c=N(i). Since also N(i) = N(i), by part (i) there exist invertible
zAsuch that iz=zi. Show that i¯z=¯zi, and hence that ij =ji
where j:= z¯z. Show that jA0and j6= 0.
iii) Now let k=ij =ji. Show that kA0and ki =ik =cj. Let d=
N(j) = j2, and determine jk,kj,k2in terms of c, d, i,j,k. In particular
show that i,j,kare pairwise orthogonal for the bilinear form (·,·).
iv) If Ais a division algebra, prove that i,j,kare linearly independent, and
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Higher Algebra 8, Exercises - Mathematics and more Exercises Algebra in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 250a: Higher Algebra Problem Set #9 (6 December 2004): Quaternion algebras

A bit more about Baer multiplication:

  1. Let A be an abelian group and G any group acting on A. For any extension 1 → A →ι E →π G → 1 consistent with this action, let Eo^ be the extension 1 → A −→−ι E →π G → 1 with the opposite embedding of A in E. [Why do E, Eo^ have the same G-action on A?] Prove that Eo^ is the inverse of E in two ways: by identifying (E, Eo)/Q with the semidirect product A o G, and by showing that E, Eo^ correspond to inverse elements of H^2 (G, A).

Note that the formula for Eo^ is what one might expect from the special case (G, A) = (Gal(L/k), L∗) and our results about the opposite of a central simple algebra.

In the next two problems, we describe generalized quaternion algebras over an arbitrary field k not of characteristic 2.

  1. i) For any (commutative) field k, define a map x 7 → ¯x on M 2 (k) by ¯x = Tr(x) · 1 − x. Here Tr(x) is the trace of x as a 2 × 2 matrix, and 1 is the 2 × 2 identity matrix, which is the unit element of M 2 (k). Prove that this map is an anti-involution, i.e., that it satisfies the identities ¯x¯ = x and xy = ¯yx¯. [This can be done either by explicit computation or via a relation between ¯x and the transpose of x.] ii) Now suppose that A/k is any central simple algebra with dimk A = 4. Define a map x 7 → x¯ on A by ¯x = Tr(x) · 1 − x, where Tr(x) is the reduced trace of x and 1 is the unit element of A. Prove that this map is an anti-involution.

Let A 0 be the kernel of Tr; it is a k-vector subspace of A of dimension 4 − 1 = 3. Let N : A → k be the reduced norm, so N (x) = x¯x. This is a quadratic form on A, and the associated bilinear form is

(x, y) = N (x + y) − N (x) − N (y) = xy¯ + y¯x = Tr(x¯y).

Note that if x ∈ A 0 then N (x) = −x^2.

  1. i) Prove that if x, y ∈ A 0 with N (x) = N (y) 6 = 0 then x, y are conjugate in A. ii) Prove that there exist i ∈ A 0 with N (i) nonzero. Fix one such i, and let c = N (i). Since also N (−i) = N (i), by part (i) there exist invertible z ∈ A such that iz = −zi. Show that i¯z = −z¯i, and hence that ij = −ji where j := z − z¯. Show that j ∈ A 0 and j 6 = 0. iii) Now let k = ij = −ji. Show that k ∈ A 0 and ki = −ik = cj. Let d = N (j) = −j^2 , and determine jk, kj, k^2 in terms of c, d, i, j, k. In particular show that i, j, k are pairwise orthogonal for the bilinear form (·, ·). iv) If A is a division algebra, prove that i, j, k are linearly independent, and

thus that A = k + ki + kj + kk. What happens if A = M 2 (k)? v) Since we know the multiplication table of { 1 , i, j, k}, we have determined A. Show that for any nonzero c, d the algebra obtained in this way is a division ring if and only if there are no (r, s, t) ∈ k^3 such that cr^2 + ds^2 + cdt^2 = 0 other than (r, s, t) = (0, 0 , 0).

It can be shown that every nondegenerate quadratic form on k^3 is equivalent to a multiple of cr^2 + ds^2 + cdt^2 = 0 for some c, d ∈ k∗; these c, d are not uniquely determined by the form, but the central simple algebras A associated to the quadratic form is uniquely determined by the equivalence class of the quadratic form up to scaling, and vice versa. Starting from part (i) we can also identify A∗/{± 1 } with the group of k-linear transformations of A 0 of determinant 1 that preserve the bilinear form (·, ·). This generalizes the identification of H∗/{± 1 } with SO 3 (R). If we regard cr^2 +ds^2 +cdt^2 = 0 as a conic in the projective plane over k, we get the simplest example of a “Brauer-Severi variety” associated to a central simple algebra.

If k = R and A is a division ring, then clearly c, d > 0; we may then scale i, j by c^1 /^2 , d^1 /^2 to identify A with H. This completes the cohomology-free proof that R, C and H are the only division algebras of finite dimension over R. Likewise it can be shown that for each p there is a unique division algebra Hp with center Qp and of dimension 4 over Qp. For odd p we constructed Hp in the seventh problem set. For our final problem, we treat the even case:

  1. Find c, d ∈ Q∗ 2 that yield a division ring H 2 with center Q 2 and of dimension 4 over Q 2.

You won’t have to look very long for suitable c, d!

Problems 1–4 are due in class Monday, December the 13th.

  1. Send me e-mail, or schedule a time to meet with me, to discuss your final paper topic.