



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Exercise problems of the for HR management
Typology: Exercises
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Selection is the process of choosing individuals with the correct qualifications needed to fill jobs in an organization āHire hard, manage easy.ā āGood training will not make up for bad selection.ā Placement Placement Fitting a person to the right job. Person/job fit Matching the KSAs of individuals with the characteristics of jobs. Selection and placement activities typically focus on applicantsā knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs), but they should also focus on the degree to which job candidates generally match the situations experienced both on the job and in the company. Psychologists label this person-environment fit. In HR it is usually called person/job fit. Fit is related not only to satisfaction with work but also to commitment to a company, and to quitting intentions. Lack of fit between KSAs and job requirements can be classified as a āmismatch.ā Five mismatch situations are:
Another method for establishing criterion-related validity is predictive validity. To calculate predictive validity, test results of applicants are compared with their subsequent job performance. Reliability of a predictor or ātestā is the extent to which it repeatedly produces the same results over time. Combining Predictors Multiple hurdles: A minimum cutoff is set on each predictor, and each minimum level must be āpassed.ā Compensatory approach: Scores from individual predictors are added and combined into an overall score, thereby allowing a higher score on one predictor to offset, or compensate for, a lower score on another. Selection Responsibilities Selection Responsibilities
Applicant Job Interest Traditionally, individuals have submitted rĆ©sumĆ©s by mail or fax, or applied in person at an employerās location. But with the growth in Internet recruiting, many individuals complete applications online or submit rĆ©sumĆ©s electronically. Job applicantsā perceptions of the organization will be influenced by how they are treated. Realistic job previews provide potential employees with an accurate introduction to a job so that they can better evaluate the employment situation. Indeed, a realistic job preview can directly enhance individual training and clarify a job role. Truth-in-Hiring Lawsuits: a candidate who leaves a good job to accept a position and later discovers such exaggerations may choose to sue the company for misrepresenting the job. In some cases, recruiters feel such pressure to āsellā the company that they āoversellā it. Pre-employment Screening Electronic Assessment Screening : Much of this screening utilizes computer software to review the many rĆ©sumĆ©s and application forms received during the recruiting and selection process. This may take several forms: disqualification questions; screening questions to get at KSAs and experience; valid assessment tests; and background, drug, and financial screening. A good strategy is to use simple electronic assessment early to cut down the number of applicants before requiring applications or interviews.
Interviews are commonly conducted at two levels: first, as an initial screening interview to determine if the person has met minimum qualifications, and then later, as an in-depth interview with HR staff members and/or operating managers to determine if the person will fit into the designated work area.
Interviewing for selection is imperfect and should be focused on gathering valid information that has not been gained in other ways. Inter-Rater Reliability and Face Validity High intra-rater reliability (within the same interviewer) can be demonstrated, but only moderate to-low inter- rater reliability (across different interviewers) is generally shown. Inter-rater reliability becomes important when each of several interviewers is selecting employees from a pool of applicants, or if the employer uses team or panel interviews with multiple interviewers. Structured Interviews A structured interview uses a set of standardized questions asked of all applicants so that comparisons can be made more easily. This type of interview allows an interviewer to prepare job-related questions in advance and then complete a standardized interviewee evaluation form that provides documentation indicating why one applicant was selected over another. Structured interviewsāin any of several forms, including biographical, behavioral, competency, and situationalāare useful when making selection decisions. Biographical Interview: A biographical interview focuses on a chronological assessment of the candidateās past experiences. Behavioral Interview: In the behavioral interview technique, applicants are asked to describe how they have performed a certain task or handled a problem in the past, which may predict future actions and show how applicants are best suited for current jobs. Competency Interview: The competency interview is similar to the behavioral interview except the questions are designed to provide the interviewer with something against which to measure the applicantās response. A competency profile for the position is often utilized, which includes a list of competencies necessary to do that particular job. Situational Interview: The situational interview contains questions about how applicants might handle specific job situations. Interview questions and possible responses are based on job analysis and checked by job experts to ensure content validity. A variation is termed the case study interview , which requires a job candidate to diagnose and correct organizational challenges during the interview. Less-Structured Interviews An unstructured interview occurs when the interviewer improvises by asking questions that are not predetermined. A semi-structured interview is a guided conversation in which broad questions are asked and new questions arise as a result of the discussion.