Interpret - Applied Analysis - Exam, Exams of Stress Analysis

These are the notes of Exam of Applied Analysis which includes Interpretation, Product and Norm Being, Asymptotic Estimate, Self Adjoint, Function, Minimizing The Functional etc. Key important points are: Interpret, Eigenvalues, Courant Minimax Principle, Weierstrass Approximation, Theorem, Set of Functions, Complete Orthonormal, Right Shift Operator, Operator and Compute, Compact Operator

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/12/2013

padmajai
padmajai 🇮🇳

4.4

(12)

84 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Applied/Numerical Analysis Qualifying Exam
January 8, 2013
Cover Sheet Applied Analysis Part
Policy on misprints: The qualifying exam committee tries to proofread exams as carefully
as possible. Nevertheless, the exam may contain a few misprints. If you are convinced a
problem has been stated incorrectly, indicate your interpretation in writing your answer. In
such cases, do not interpret the problem so that it becomes trivial.
Name
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Interpret - Applied Analysis - Exam and more Exams Stress Analysis in PDF only on Docsity!

Applied/Numerical Analysis Qualifying Exam

January 8, 2013

Cover Sheet – Applied Analysis Part

Policy on misprints: The qualifying exam committee tries to proofread exams as carefully

as possible. Nevertheless, the exam may contain a few misprints. If you are convinced a

problem has been stated incorrectly, indicate your interpretation in writing your answer. In

such cases, do not interpret the problem so that it becomes trivial.

Name

Combined Applied Analysis/Numerical Analysis Qualifier

Applied Analysis Part

January 8, 2013

Instructions: Do all problems in this part of the exam. Show all of your work clearly.

1. The eigenvalues of the given symmetric matrix A can be ordered

Use the Courant Minimax Principle to find the value for λ 3.

A =

2. Answer the following:

a. State the Weierstrass Approximation Theorem for functions defined on the interval [0, 1].

b. Given that C([0, 1]) is dense in L^2 ([0, 1]), prove that the set of functions {x^3 n}∞ n=0 is dense

in L^2 ([0, 1]).

c. Explain how you would produce a complete orthonormal set from the functions {x^3 n}∞ n=0,

and prove that your orthonormal set is complete in L^2 ([0, 1]).

3. Let H = ℓ^2 and suppose L : H → H is the right-shift operator so that for u ∈ H

(Lu) 1 = 0

(Lu)n = un− 1 , n = 2, 3 ,...

a. Show that L is a bounded, linear operator and compute ‖L‖ (not just an upper bound).

b. Find the adjoint L∗^ for this operator.

c. Show that if |λ| ≥ 1 the closure of the range of L − λI is H.

4. Suppose H is a Hilbert space and K : H → H is a compact linear operator.

a. Prove that K∗K is a self-adjoint, compact operator, and that the eigenvalues of K∗K are

all non-negative.

b. Prove that there exist positive numbers {αi}Ni=1 and orthonormal sets {φi}Ni=1 and {ψi}Ni=

(where N may be either a positive integer or ∞) so that

Ku =

∑^ N

i=

αi〈u, φi〉ψi

for all u ∈ H.

Combined Applied Analysis/Numerical Analysis Qualifier Numerical analysis part January, 2012

In all questions below, you may use standard estimates for finite element interpolation operators without proving them.

Problem 1. (a) You may assume the inequality

‖u‖^2 H (^1) (ˆτ ) ≤ C

ˆτ

|∇u|^2 dˆx + ¯u^2

, for all u ∈ H^1 (ˆτ ).

Here ˆτ is the reference triangle in R^2 , ¯u denotes the mean value of u on ˆτ and Pk^ denotes the polynomials of (x, y) of degree at most k. Let τ denote a general triangle in R^2. Show that

‖u‖^2 H (^1) (τ ) ≤ Cθ

τ

|∇u|^2 dx + h^2 ¯u^2

, for all u ∈ P^1.

Here θ denotes the minimum angle of τ and h its diameter. Now ¯u denotes the mean value of u on τ. (You may assume, without proof, standard properties involving the dependence on θ of the affine map of ˆτ onto τ .) (b) Let Vh be the space of continuous piecewise linear functions with respect to a quasi-uniform mesh Ω = ∪Ni=1τi. Consider the one point quadrature approximation

Qτi (g) := |τi| g(bi) ≈

τi

g,

where |τi| is the area of τi and bi is its barycenter. Consider the finite element problem: Find uh ∈ Vh satisfying Ah(uh, φ) = Fh(φ), for all φ ∈ Vh. Here for uh, vh ∈ Vh,, Ah and Fh are given by

A(uh, vh) :=

∑^ N

i=

(Qτi (∇uh · ∇vh) + Qτi (uhvh)) and Fh(vh) :=

∑^ N

i=

Qτi (f vh).

respectively. Show that

Qτi (|∇u|^2 ) =

τi

|∇u|^2 and Qτi (|u|^2 ) = |τi| ¯u^2 , for all u ∈ P^1.

(c) Use Parts (b) and (c) above to show that the form Ah(·, ·) is Vh-elliptic, i.e., Ah(vh, vh) ≥ c‖vh‖^2 H (^1) (Ω), for all vh ∈ Vh,

holds with c independent of h.

Problem 2. Let Ω be a convex polygonal domain of R^2. Given f ∈ L^2 (Ω), we denote by u ∈ H 01 (Ω) the solution of the Poisson problem:

−∆u = f in Ω, u = 0 on ∂Ω.

We note that u satisfies full elliptic regularity, i.e., u ∈ H^2 (Ω). We consider a non conforming finite element method to approximate u. Let {Th} 0 <h< 1 be a sequence of conforming shape regular subdivisions of Ω such that diam(T ) ≤ h. Denote by Xh the spaces of continuous, piecewise linear polynomials subordinate to the subdivisions Th, 0 < h < 1.

2

The numerical method consists of finding uh ∈ Xh such that for all vh ∈ Xh:

ah(uh, vh) :=

Ω

∇uh · ∇vh −

∂Ω

∂ν uh vh +

α h

∂Ω

uh vh =

Ω

f vh.

Here ν denotes the outward pointing unit normal (defined almost everywhere), ∂ν u := ∇u · ν and α > 0 is a constant yet to be determined. Note that Xh 6 ⊂ H 01 (Ω) but Xh ⊂ H^1 (Ω).

(a) Explain why ah(u, vh) makes sense for any vh ∈ Xh and show Galerkin orthogonality, i.e.,

ah(u − uh, vh) = 0, for all vh ∈ Xh.

(b) For any vh ∈ Xh, defined the mesh dependent norm

‖vh‖h :=

‖∇vh‖^2 L 2 (Ω) +

α h

‖vh‖^2 L 2 (∂Ω)

Show that there exists a constant c 0 independent of h such that for all vh ∈ Xh ∫

∂Ω

|∇vh|^2 ≤

c 0 h

Ω

|∇vh|^2.

Using this fact, deduce that for all vh ∈ Xh,

ah(vh, vh) ≥

‖vh‖^2 h,

provided α ≥ c 0. (c) Let Ih denote the Lagrange finite element interpolation operator associated with Xh. You may use the following estimate without proof: For i = 1, 2, ∥ ∥∥ ∥

∂(u − Ihu) ∂xi

L^2 (e)

≤ Ch^1 /^2 ‖u‖H (^2) (τ ).

Take α = c 0 and derive an optimal error estimate for ‖u − uh‖h.

Problem 3. Given the boundary value problem: find u(x, t) such that

∂u ∂t

= κ

∂^2 u ∂x^2

− b(x)

∂u ∂x

  • f (x), 0 < x < 1 , 0 < t ≤ T,

u(0, t) = 0, u(1, t) = 0, 0 < t ≤ T u(x, 0) = v(x), 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 ,

where κ = const > 0, b(x) ∈ C^0 [0, 1], v(x), and f (x) are given smooth functions. Let xi = ih with h = 1/N and tn = nτ , with n = 0, 1 ,... , J and (time step size) τ = T /J.

(1) Write down a forward (explicit) Euler fully discrete scheme for the above problem based on a finite difference discretization in space which upwinds the b(x) term. (2) Find a Courant (CFL) condition and show that if this condition is satisfied,

‖U n+1‖∞ ≤ ‖U n‖∞ + τ ‖f (tn)‖∞. Here U n^ is the approximation at tn of part (a). (3) Define the fully discrete method but with backward (implicit) Euler time stepping and show that this scheme is unconditionally stable, i.e., prove that for any positive τ , ‖U n+1‖∞ ≤ ‖U n‖∞ + τ ‖f (tn+1)‖∞ holds.