



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The interpretation of summative assessment data to determine student performance and the evaluation of the appropriateness of the assessment instrument. It also recommends changes to the lesson plan based on the assessment data and explains how these changes can improve student performance. data on the performance of 30 students on an English lesson plan and suggests ways to group students based on their scores and identify factors that may have contributed to their performance.
Typology: Thesis
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




JKM1 Task 3: Summative Assessments Western Governors University JKM1 Task 3: Summative Assessments This paper will demonstrate the competency of interpreting summative assessment data to determine student performance. It will then evaluate whether the summative assessment is an appropriate measurement instrument based on the standards, objectives, and curriculum content aspects of a lesson plan. This paper will also recommend a change to the content or instructional change in the lesson plan based on the summative assessment data and information in the student profiles. Lastly, this paper will include an explanation of how the content/ instructional change would improve student performance on the summative assessment. Interpretation of Summative Assessment Data To provide teachers with information that is more comprehensive, many educators propose that students be asked to carry out authentic assessment tasks that require using or applying knowledge and skills in more realistic situations (Ryan, Cooper, & Tauer, 2013). On the summative assessment, 30 students took the assessment to get an objective, performance, and cumulative score. On the objective score, 3 out of 30 students scored 100. 2 out of 30 scored 90, 7 students scored 80, 10 scored 70, 7 scored 60, and 1 student scored 50. The average score for the objective-based scores was 74. There were ten questions on the objective portion of the summative assessment with each question being a choose the correct answer question. For the performance-based portion of the summative assessment, the directions are to write 3 original sentences showing examples of figurative language and listing the type of
figurative language used in the sentence. Out of all 30 students, 2 scored 100, 3 scored 91, 6 scored 83, 10 scored 75, 5 scored 66, 2 scored 58, 1 scored 42, and 1 scored 33. The average score of these all together is 75. The highest score was 100 on the performance-based portion while 33 was the lowest score making a 67 percent difference. The cumulative averaging scores were also 75 percent out of the 30 students. With those 30 students, 1 scored 100, 2 scored in the 90s, 4 scored in the 80s, 10 scored in the 70s, 8 scored in the 60s, and 2 scored in the 50s range. The data shown here can be used to determine student performance by comparing it first to the formative assessment data stated in the lesson plan. Secondly, it can be used to determine who has the lowest and highest scores from the summative assessment. Listing the students in ascending score range can help to group the students together by score groups and then determine if there are any factors of why those students scored in that range. Some factors could be if there are multiple English language learners in the lower scoring group, same for the student who has autism and a learning disability. If those students seem to be in the lower scoring range, the teacher can evaluate the scores related to the students to reflect on what they can do better in the lesson plan to meet the needs of those students. Evaluating students’ scores to determine their performance is a great way to determine who is struggling, average scored compared to other students’ score, and who has shown they have mastered the skills by achieving the objective goals or meeting the standards. Evaluation of Summative Assessment The standards stated in this English lesson plan is to apply a wide range of strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate, and appreciate texts (#3). The second standard listed is for students to apply knowledge of language structure, language conventions, media techniques, figurative language, and genre to create, critique, and discuss print and non-print texts (#6). The
partner activity. Checking for understanding by circulating the room during an activity is a quick way to see where students may be in their progress of understanding figurative language before the summative assessment is taken. Using all of these activities to review and learn new content is a great way to help the students use the information they’ve learned to demonstrate their comprehensions on the summative assessment. Everything that is on the summative assessment should have been addressed in the lesson plan to ensure students’ success. Content or Instructional Change A change in the lesson plan could be made to improve student performances. This change would be to accommodate more to students who are ELL, autistic, and have learning disabilities. These students seem to have had most of the lowest scores of the summative assessment. I would add accommodations to the lesson plan to differentiate it more by adding the first language of the ELL students on the PowerPoint slides when introducing new knowledge. The lesson plan does address having students with a learning disability be given poems on their reading level and look for just one term instead of all them which is a good way to modify the lesson to meet the needs of those students. I would also add more visuals for students who are autistic, helping to understand figurative language in a concrete way by comparing or contrasting it to literal language. Explanation of Recommendation Add new knowledge in the first language as well as English helps English language learners to understand the content in their first and second language to ensure comprehension. Adding visuals and comparing or contrasting figurative language helps students with autism not
have a sensory overload and be provided with more concrete information to help them assist it with connecting the new information in a meaningful and understandable way. It is the role of educators to meet the needs of all students and to ensure they try their best to increase students’ performance as much as possible. In changing or adding these recommendations to the lesson plans, students who scored lower on the summative assessment should increase their scores with increased abilities to demonstrate a better comprehension of the material. Resources Ryan, K., Cooper, J.M., & Tauer, S. (2013). Teaching for student learning: Becoming a master teacher, 2nd ed. [Western Governors University eBook]. Retrieved from: https://wgu.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781285821061/