


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An analysis of a summative assessment given to an 8th grade English class on figurative language. information on the class demographics, the assessment structure, and the results. The analysis shows that the assessment is inappropriate and needs improvement as it only measures two out of three lesson objectives and only 27% of the class mastered the concept.
Typology: Thesis
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Summative Assessments Assessment for Student Learning KAT2 Task 3 Western Governors University A summative assessment was given to a group of thirty students within an 8th grade English classroom. The class is comprised of sixteen male students and fourteen female students from various races and ethnicities. Included in this class are: Seventeen on level students (57%) Six students functioning at one grade level below grade level (20%) Four students who perform one grade level above grade level (13%) Three students who are two grade levels above grade level (10%) Two English Language Learners (one Mandarin, one Spanish) Eight students meeting the criteria for free or reduced lunches Three students with Individualized Education Plans (one with a disability is Math, one in Language, and one with Asperger’s Syndrome Furthermore, the instructional setting is set up in a way that the instructor is able to easily navigate between rows of students and is able to teach from any point in the room. The English students were given a summative assessment at the end of a unit on figurative language. The test was comprised of an objective section involving ten multiple choice questions and a performance section (graded using a rubric) requiring students to write three sentences showing examples of figurative language. When looking at the cumulative scores from the assessment, students scored an average of 75%. When using a basic standard grading scale of A (90%-100%), B (80%-89%), C (70%-79%), D (60%-69%), and F (59% and below), the scores can further be broken down as follows: Two received 100%
Two scored an A Four students earned a B Ten students received a C Nine students made a D Three students failed Given the scores and making an assumption that 80% is considered mastery, the scores show that only 27% of the class mastered the concept which indicates that this assessment is inappropriate and needs improvement. The lesson on figurative language focuses on three different objectives. At the end of the lesson, students will be able to distinguish between literal and figurative language (objective one), create examples of figurative language (objective two), and identify seven different types of figurative language (objective three). There is no evidence that objective one is being measured using this summative assessment. The test only focuses on figurative language, not literal, which does not align to the lesson objective. However, the remaining two objectives are measured appropriately on the summative assessment with one of them falling slightly short in content. The objective section of the assessment provides students with suitable examples of the seven different types of figurative language which properly addresses objective three. An appropriate assessment of objective two is seen in the performance section of the test, with the only downfall being that it does not specifically state whether the student needs to use more than one type of figurative language. The lesson revolves around three standards from the National Council of Teachers of English and appear to align with the summative assessment. Standard three states that students will apply a wide range of strategies to comprehend, interpret, evaluate, and appreciate texts;
students with IEPs) in this class, some students could have been marked down up to eight points on a twelve-point rubric. This would significantly impact the average score of the class and would not give a true picture of content mastery. To comply more with what has been taught in the lesson, the instructor could remove the portion of the rubric that assesses punctuation and capitalization. I would choose to modify the lesson plan to include a refresher course on correct sentence structure and leave the rubric as is. Since writing is a lifelong skill and is required in high school, I would recommend taking the time to ensure students are proficient in sentence structure. I would also make a slight modification to ensure that lower functioning students were not being left behind. Pairing the English Language Learners and the students with Individualized Education Plans with a peer tutor, who is at or above level, would most likely close some of the learning gaps that I can confidently say occurred during this unit of study. Many of the activities included written or verbal responses which is a deficit for approximately ten students in this English class. These students may be reluctant to respond to written work or participate in group activities for fear they will give an incorrect answer. Allowing these students to work with other students one on one would allow them to grow and learn in an environment that is more controlled and less scrutinized. Regardless, these slight changes would set students up for success and increase the scores on the summative assessment.