


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The strengths and weaknesses of a standards-based curriculum and how it aligns with state standards. The author provides an explanation of how a lesson plan is aligned to meet a specific state standard and how it helps students practice the required skills. The instructional setting is a first-grade classroom with a small district, consisting of 20 students, 16 of whom are English Language Learners. The curriculum used is Engage New York for mathematics and ELA.
Typology: Thesis
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Running head: JYT2 Task Two: Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment JYT2, Curriculum Design, Task 2 Western Governors University Introductio n My instructional setting addressed is a first-grade classroom within a small district. The class consists of 20 students, 8 boys and 12 girls—16 of them being English Language Learners. ELLs get pulled out throughout the day for LEP resources. Native languages spoken in my classroom are English, Spanish, and Russian. Ages range from 6-8 and are also addressed in the discussion of human development theories. Many of my students read and write below grade level. Engage New York is the curriculum used for mathematics and ELA. Educational Methodology Strengths and Weaknesses of Standards-Based Curriculum A standards-based curriculum is designed and written by looking at local, state, and national standards and aligning the instructional activities and assessments to meet those standards. With this methodology, the curriculum is “always under review, as the design should evolve to meet student needs,” (Martin-Kneip, 2000, as cited in Knapp-Witt, 2017, p.4). Strengths of a standards-based curriculum are that there’s clarity in what outcomes are expected because they align with the standards, and that there’s alignment in assessments, activities, and objectives, (Knapp-Witt, 2017). Another strength is that standards-based levels the playing field because the grade-level expectations are the same across the board with schools and districts that use standards-based, (No Author, 2014). Weaknesses of a standards- based curriculum are that it lacks flexibility in outcomes and that it lacks models of practice or specific strategies to reach standards (Martin-Kniep, 2000).
One pro of using a standards-based curriculum as an educational methodology in my first-grade classroom is that the objectives are aligned with state standards, so the expectations are the same in the other first grade classrooms. Because of this, kindergarten, first grade, and second grade teachers are able to collaborate in instructional planning to make sure pre- requisites are being met, lessons can be adjusted to assist in reaching standards, and teachers are able to prep their students for the following grade-level. Teachers are also able to plan and adjust their lesson planning to meet the student needs in order to meet state standards. In my instructional setting there are two factors that contribute to a con of using a standards-based curriculum: students who did not attend kindergarten, and the percentage of ELLs in the classroom. These are two factors because not all students start first grade on the same level, so some students may have difficulty meeting end of year first-grade standards because of language barriers and lack of background knowledge. Explanation of Curriculum Alignment to Standards State standard CCLS-Math 1.G.1 states that students will distinguish between defining attributes (e.g. triangles are closed and three-sided) versus non-defining attributes (e.g. color, orientation, overall size); build and draw shapes to possess defining attributes. The lesson objective aligned to meet this standard states that students will find and name two-dimensional shapes including trapezoid, rhombus, and a square as a special rectangle, based on defining attributes of sides and corners. The guided practice learning activity has students in pairs, and they are to construct shapes with straws based off of shape description cards. An extension of this activity is to match the shape description cards with the shapes that they made. There is strength in this activity as it aligns with building and drawing shapes to possess defining attributes (CCLS-Math 1.G.1) and it helps students’ practice being able to
Martin-Kniep, G. 2000. Becoming a Better Teacher: Eight Innovations That Work. Retrieved from: https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook?sid=f7b7dcc8-1ebc-4814- 8084-eb84b0b1e44e%40sessionmgr4007&ppid=pp_14&vid=1&format=EB.