

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
these documents shall help the students in exams
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Q1: define legal disability in case where the person or persons is or are under legal disability. How is the period prescribe d for limitation reckoned? Which special exception is provided in case of legal disability. Section 6,7 and 8 Legal Disability refers to a situation where a person is unable to perform legal acts due to certain conditions, such as being a minor, mental ly incapacitated, or otherwise lacking the legal capacity to enter into contracts or take legal action. This status can affect a person's ability to sue or be sued, and it has implications for the statute of limitations regarding legal actions. A legal disability occurs when a person is unable to engage in legal actions due to specific restrictions imposed by law. Common examples include minors (persons under the age of 18), persons of unsound mind, and individuals declared legally incapacitated by a court.
1. Definition : In legal contexts, the limitation period refers to the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated. When a person is under legal disability, the limitation period for filing a suit may be extended.
2. Limitation Period : The limitation period is generally paused or extended for the duration of the legal disability. This means that the time during which the person is disabled does not count towards the limitation period.
○ For example, if a minor has a claim, the limitation period does not start until the minor reaches the age of majority.
3. How is the Limitation Period Reckoned? : Section 6 : Generally, if a person is under a legal disability, the limitation period does not run against them until the disability isremoved. For example, if a person is a minor at the time of the event causing the legal action, the limitation period is extended until they reach adulthood.
Section 7 : This section often provides that if a person is legally disabled at the time a cause of action arises, the limitation period will not begin until the disability ceases. For instance, if a mentally incapacitated person regains capacity, the limitation period will start from that point.
4. Special Exceptions Provided for Legal Disability (Sections 6, 7, and 8) :
It states that the provisions of Sections 6 and 7 , which allow for the extension of the limitation period for individuals under legal disability, do not apply to suits for the enforcement of rights of pre-emption (the right to purchase property before others).
Furthermore, even in cases where Sections 6 and 7 might otherwise apply, the limitation period cannot be extended for more than three years from the cessation of the legal disability or the death of the person affected.
Legal disability can pause the limitation period for initiating legal actions. However, Section 8 sets a specific limit for extending this period in cases of pre - emption rights, ensuring that claims are not indefinitely delayed. The limitation period must be initiated within three years after the legal disability ends or the person's death, providing a clear timeline for such claims. Q2: discuss the effect of fraud and acknowledgment in writing with regard to the limitation act 1908 section 18 and 19 Where any person did any fraud in institution of suit knowingly that the truth or it is being concealed any document it shall be considered fraud. If anything happened than defendant where knows that he has been fraudulent the limitation time compute from it. Section 18 Acknowledgment in writing means where parties agrees to restart the limitation date mean a person whose limitation date has r eached but due to mutual agreement and parties agreed that reinitiated the date of limitation than period shall start newly. That acknowledgment shall be signed. Th at shall be set off. Section 19 Q3: examine the provisions related to arbitration in suits Mutual Consent for Arbitration: If all parties in a lawsuit agree, they can apply to the court before judgment to have their dispute referred to arbitration (Section 19).
2. Appointment of Arbitrator: The arbitrator is selected by the parties as per their agreement (Section 20). Court's Role: The court issues an order for arbitration, specifying the time for the arbitrator to deliver the award (decision). After referring the matter, the court does not interfere unless explicitly allowed (Section 21).
Partial Arbitration: If only some parties agree to arbitration, the court can refer their specific issues to arbitration while continuing the lawsuit for the rest. The arbitration outcome only binds the parties who agreed (Section 22).
General Provisions: The court may step in to cancel the arbitration and resume the lawsuit in certain circumstances, like when there are procedural issues or vacancies in the arbitration panel (Section 23).
In the context of suits, arbitration allows parties to resolve their disputes outside of court through mutual agreement. Here 's a brief overview based on the provided sections: This approach balances the benefits of arbitration with the court's supervisory powers. Q4: enumerate the grounds available to a landlord for evection of his tenant under section 15 of the Sindh rented premises or dinance 1979. Under section 15 following are grounds:
Habib Hamid v. Liaquat All This case held that an oral agreement is not legally binding and cannot be used in litigation. However, another judge disagreed with this ruling, stating that the section of the ordinance was intended to provide a clear process for executing tenancy agreements, but it does not prohib it oral tenancy.
Fatima v. Hanifa
05 October 2024 09:
Fatima v. Hanifa This case supported the idea that oral tenancy agreements are permissible under the SRPO.
Q6: examine the provisions related to arbitration with intervention of a court where there is no suit pending. Section 19 to 23 Arbitration Agreement Without a Suit : When parties agree to settle their disputes through arbitration without initiating a lawsuit, they can approach the court f or assistance in certain situations. This is possible even if no formal suit is pending between them.
Court's Role in Appointment of Arbitrators : If the parties cannot agree on the appointment of an arbitrator, they can apply to the court for the appointment of one, ev en if there is no active litigation. The court will then step in to appoint an arbitrator to ensure the dispute is resolved fair ly.
Interim Measures : Parties may also approach the court for interim relief or protective measures before or during arbitration proceedings. For example, the court may grant injunctions or other forms of protection to safeguard the subject matter of the dispute until the arbitrator makes a fi nal decision.
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement : If one party refuses to arbitrate after an arbitration agreement has been made, the other party can seek the court's interv ention to compel arbitration, even when no suit is pending.
Q2: definitions: