LCAO Introduction - Solid State Physics - Lecture Slides, Slides of Solid State Physics

This course deals with crystalline solids and is intended to provide students with basic physical concepts and mathematical tools used to describe solids. Key words in this lecture are: LCAO Introduction, Infinite Linear Chain, Monatomic Linear Chain, True Hamiltonian, Dirc Notation, Energy Band, Overlap Energy Integral

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 12/31/2013

amitaa
amitaa 🇮🇳

4.3

(24)

95 documents

1 / 22

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Introduction to the
Tightbinding (LCAO)
Method
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16

Partial preview of the text

Download LCAO Introduction - Solid State Physics - Lecture Slides and more Slides Solid State Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Introduction to theTightbinding (LCAO)

Method

Tightbinding:

1 Dimensional Model

-^ Consider an

Infinite Linear Chain

of identical atoms, with

1 s-orbital

valence e

-^ per atom

& interatomic spacing =

a

-^ Approximation:

Only Nearest-Neighbor interactions.

(Interactions between atoms further apart than

a^ are^ ~ 0

This model is called the

“Monatomic Chain”.

Each atom has s electron orbitals only! Near-neighbor interaction only means that the

s^ orbital on site

n^ interacts with the

s^ orbitals on sites

n – 1^ &^

n + 1^ only!

n =^ Atomic Label

a^   

n =^ -

-^ The localized atomic orbitals on each site for this

Monatomic

Linear Chain

of atoms look qualitatively like this:

n = -^

-^ -^ -^

^ a^  ^3

The spherically symmetric

s^ orbitals on each site overlap

slightly with those of their neighbors, as shown. Thisallows the electron on site

n^ to interact with its

nearest-neighbors on sites^ n – 1

&^ n + 1

The True Hamiltonian in the solid is

:

H = (p)

2 /(2m)o^

+ V(x),

with^ V(x) = V(x + a)

-^ Instead

,^ approximate

it as^ H

^ ∑ Hn^

(n) +^ at

∑ U(n,nn,n

where,^ H

(n)^ ^ Atomic Hamiltonianat

for atom

n.

U(n,n)

^ Interaction Energy

between atoms

n^ &^ n.

Use the assumption of

Only Nearest-neighbor Interactions

:

^ U(n,n

) = 0^ unless

n^ = n -

or^ n^ = n +

-^ With this assumption, the

Approximate Hamiltonian

is:

H^ ^

[H^ (n) + U(n,n -1) + U(n,n + 1)]n at^

-^ Dirac notation:

Ek

^  Ψ |H| k^

Ψ k

(This Matrix Element is shorthand for a spatial integral!)

-^ Using the assumptions for

H^ &^ Ψ k

(x)^ already listed:

^ E^ =k^

Ψ | Hkn^

(n) | Ψ atk +^  Ψ |[ k

U(n,n-1) + U(n,n-1)]|n

Ψ k

also note that

H(n)| ψ at

^ =^ ε | ψ nn 

-^ The LCAO assumption is

:^ | Ψ ^ k

ikna ∑ en

| ψ n

-^ Assume

orthogonality of the atomic orbitals:^ ^  ψ n

| ψ ^ =^ n^ δ (= 1, n = nn,n^

;^ = 0, n^

^ n)

-^ The Nearest-neighbor interaction

assumption:

^ There is nearest-neighbor overlap energy only!

( α^ =^ constant)

ψ |U(n,nn

^ 1)| ψ n

^ ^

-^ α ;^ (n

= n,^ &^ n

= n^ ^ 1)

ψ |U(n,nn

^ 1)| ψ n

^ = 0,^ otherwise

It can be shown that for

α^ > 0, this^ must be negative!

-^ As a student exercise, show that the

“energy band”

of this model is:

E=^ ε^ - 2 α k

cos(ka)^

or^ E

=^ ε^ - 2 α k^

  • 4 α^ sin

2 [(½)ka]

-^ A trig identity was used to get last form.

ε^ &^ α^ are usually taken as parameters

in the theory, instead of actually calculating them from the atomic

ψ n

^ The^ “Bandstructure”

for this monatomic chain with nearest-neighbor interactions only looks like (assuming

2 α^ <^ ε^ ):^

(E^ E-T^ k^

ε^ + 2 α ) It’s interesting to

note that: The form^

E=^ ε^ - 2 α k

cos(ka)^ is similar to Krönig-Penney modelresults in the linear approximationfor the messy transcendentalfunction! There, we got:^ E

= A - Bcos(ka)k^ where A^ &^ B^ were constants.

E^ T^4 α

The True Hamiltonian in the solid is

H = (p)

2 /(2m)o^

+ V(x),

with^ V(x) = V(x + a)

-^ Instead

,^ approximate it

(with^ γ^ = A

or =B)^ as H^ ^ ∑γ n

H( γ ,n) +at^

U( γ n, γ n

γ ,n; γ ,n

where,^ H

( γ ,n)^ ^ at Atomic Hamiltonian

for atom

γ^ in cell^

n.

U( γ ,n; γ ,n

)^ ^ Interaction Energy

between atom of type

γ

in cell^ n^

& atom of type

γ^ ^ in cell

n.

Use the assumption of

only nearest-neighbor interactions

The only non-zero

U( γ ,n; γ

,n)

are^ U(A,n;B,n-1) = U(B,n;A,n+1)

^ U(n,n-1)

^ U(n,n+1)

-^ With this assumption, the

Approximate Hamiltonian

is:

H^ ^ ∑^ γ n

H^ ( γ ,n) + at

∑ [U(n,n -1) + U(n,n + 1)]n^

H^ ^ ∑γ n

H( γ ,n) +at^

[U(n,n -1) + U(n,n + 1)]n

-^ Goal:

Calculate the bandstructure

Eby solving the Schrödinger Equation:k^ H Ψ (x) = E^ Ψ kk

(x)k

-^ Use the LCAO (Tightbinding) Assumptions:^ 1. H

is as above. 2. Solutions to the atomic Schrödinger Equation are known:^ H(at

γ ,n) ψ (x) = E γ n^

ψ (x) γ n γ n^

3.^ In our simple case of

1 s-orbital/atom

:

E=^ ε =AnA^

the energy of the atomic e

-^ on atom

A

E=^ ε =BnB^

the energy of the atomic e

-^ on atom

B

4.^ ψ (x) γ n^

is very localized near cell

n

5.^ The Crucial

(LCAO

)^ assumption is:ikna Ψ (x)^ ^ ∑ e^ kn^

∑^ C ψγ n γγ

(x)

That is, the Bloch Functions are linear combinations of atomic orbitals!

Note!! The C’s^ are unknown γ

-^ Student exercise to show that these simplify to:

0 = ( ε A^

  • E^ )C^ k^ A

+ 2 μ cos(ka)C

, (3)B^

and

0 = 2 μ cos(ka)C

+ ( ε - EA^ B^

)C^ ,^ k^ B

-^ ε ,^ ε AB

,^ μ^ are usually taken as parameters in the theory, instead of (^) computing them from the atomic

ψγ n

-^ (3) & (4) are linear, homogeneous algebraic equations for

C^ &^ C^ A^ B

^2 ^2 determinant of coefficients = 0

-^ This gives:

( ε - EA^

)( ε - Ek B^

) - 4^ μ k

2 [cos(ka)]

^ A quadratic equation

for^ E!k^

^ 2 solutions:

a^ “valence” band

& a^ “conduction” band

-^ Results:^ “Bandstructure” of the Diatomic Linear Chain

(2 bands):

E(k) = (½)(

ε +^ ε A^ B

)^ [(¼)(

ε -^ ε )A^ B

{cos(ka)}

2

-^ This gives a

k = 0^ bandgap of E = E^ (0) - EG +^

(0) = 2[(¼)(-

ε -^ ε )A^ B^

2 2 + 4 μ ]

½

-^ For simplicity, plot in the case

ε -^ ε )A^ B

2 &^ ε B^

>^ ε A

^ Expand the

½^ [ ….]part of E(k)^ & keep the lowest order term

^ E^ (k)+

^ ε + A[cos(ka)]B^

2 ,^ E

(k)^ ^ ε -^ A

  • A[cos(ka)]

2

E^ (0)^ ^ G^

ε –^ ε + 2AA^ B^

,^ where^ A

(^2)  (4 μ )/| ε -^ ε |A^ B^

Tightbinding Method:

3 Dimensional Model

-^ Model:

Consider a monatomic solid, 3d, with only nearest-neighbor interactions. Hamiltonian:

H = (p)

2 /(2m) + V(r)o^ V(r) = crystal potential,

with the full lattice symmetry & periodicity.

-^ Assume

(R,R^ = lattice sites):^ H^

^ ∑ HR^

(R) +at

∑ U(R,RR,R

H(R)^ at^

Atomic Hamiltonian

for atom at

R
U(R,R)

^ Interaction Potential

between atoms at

R & R

Near-neighbor interactions only! ^ U(R,R

) = 0^ unless

R & R

are nearest-neighbors

-^ Goal:

Calculate the bandstructure

Eby solving the Schrödinger Equation:k^

H Ψ (r) = Ek^

Ψ (r)kk^

-^ Use the LCAO (Tightbinding) Assumptions:^ 1. H

is as on previous page. 2. Solutions to the atomic Schrödinger Equation are known: H(R) ψ (R) = Eat n

ψ (R),^ nn

n^ = Orbital Label (

s, p, d,..),

E=^ Atomic energy of the en

-^ in orbital

n

3.^ ψ (R)n

is very localized around

R

4.^ The Crucial

(LCAO

)^ assumption is:

Ψ (r) =k^

ik ∑ eR

R ∑ b^ ψ n^ n

(r-R)^ n

(bto be determined)n^

ψ (R):^ The atomic functions are orthogonal for differentn^

n^ &^ R

That is, the Bloch Functions are linear combinations of atomic orbitals!

-^ Manipulate

(several pages of algebra)

to get:

(E^ - E^ k^ m

)b^ +^ ∑ m^

∑ enR^0

ikR^ γ (R)bmn^

= 0 ,^ n^

(I)

where:^ γ mn

(R)^ ^  ψ

|U(0,R)|m ψ ^ ^ “Overlap Energy Integral” n

-^ The^ γ

(R)^ are analogous to themn

α^ &^ μ^ in the 1d models. They are

similar to

V, etc. in real materials, discussed next! The integrals aress σ horrendous to do for real atomic

ψ!^ In practice, they are treated asm

parameters to fit to experimental data.• Equation (I)

:^ Is a system of

N^ homogeneous, linear, algebraic

equations for the coefficients

b.^ N =^ number of atomic orbitals.n

-^ Equation (I)

for^ N atomic states ^ The solution is obtained by taking an

N^ ^ N^ determinant! This results in

N bands^ which have their roots in the atomic orbitals!

-^ If the^ γ

(R)^ are “small”, each band can be thought of asmn

E^ ~ E^ + kk^ n^

dependent corrections That is, the bands are

~^ atomic levels + corrections

-^ Equation (I)

: A system of homogeneous, linear, algebraic eqtns for the

bn

-^ N atomic states

^ Solve an

N^ ^ N^ determinant!

^ N bands

Note:^ We’ve implicitly assumed

1 atom/unit cell.

If there are

n atoms/unit cell

, we get^ nN

equations &

nN bands!

-^ Artificial Special Case #1:

One^ s^ level per atom  1 (s-like) band

-^ Artificial Special Case #2:

Three^ p

levels per atom

^ 3 (p-like) bands

-^ Artificial Special Case #3:

One^ s^ and three

p^ levels per atom &

(^3) spbonding

^ 4 bands^ NOTE that

For n atoms /unit cell, multiply by n to get the number of bands!