Utilitarian Approach vs. Moral Rights Model: Ethical Decision Making in Business, Lecture notes of Project Management

This document compares two ethical decision-making models: the utilitarian approach and the moral rights model. The utilitarian approach assesses actions based on their consequences, aiming for the greatest good for the greatest number. The moral rights model, on the other hand, evaluates decisions and behaviors based on their compatibility with fundamental rights such as life, transparency, privacy, freedom, expression, and private property.

Typology: Lecture notes

2019/2020

Uploaded on 06/16/2022

marcelita_1229
marcelita_1229 🇵🇭

5

(1)

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
UTILITARIAN MODEL
The Utilitarian Approach assesses an action in terms of its consequences or outcomes;
i.e., the net benefits and costs to all stakeholders on an individual level. It strives to
achieve the greatest good for the greatest number while creating the least amount of
harm or preventing the greatest amount of suffering. It holds that every entity’s
interests should be considered equally when making the decision, and this includes
those of other species since they also are capable of suffering.
So for any set of options it would view the most ethical option as the one which
produces the best balance of benefits over harm for the most stakeholders. Outcomes
may be quantified in such terms as contentment and suffering, the relative value of
individual preferences, monetary gain or loss, or the short-term and long-term effects
of an action.
In a business context, this approach might rely on a statistical analysis of probable
outcomes, a classic costs/benefits assessment, and/or a consideration of the marginal
utility of a consequence for various stakeholders in the group.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Utilitarian Approach vs. Moral Rights Model: Ethical Decision Making in Business and more Lecture notes Project Management in PDF only on Docsity!

UTILITARIAN MODEL

The Utilitarian Approach assesses an action in terms of its consequences or outcomes; i.e., the net benefits and costs to all stakeholders on an individual level. It strives to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number while creating the least amount of harm or preventing the greatest amount of suffering. It holds that every entity’s interests should be considered equally when making the decision, and this includes those of other species since they also are capable of suffering. So for any set of options it would view the most ethical option as the one which produces the best balance of benefits over harm for the most stakeholders. Outcomes may be quantified in such terms as contentment and suffering, the relative value of individual preferences, monetary gain or loss, or the short-term and long-term effects of an action. In a business context, this approach might rely on a statistical analysis of probable outcomes, a classic costs/benefits assessment, and/or a consideration of the marginal utility of a consequence for various stakeholders in the group.

MORAL RIGHTS MODEL

Moral Rights Model is an ethic model for the decision taking that evaluates the decisions and behaviors, by its compatibility with the fundamental rights such as the right to life, freedom, health and privacy of the person o r group. According to this model, decisions and behaviors should respect 6 moral rights, namely:  Life and Safety: the organization members, clients and public in general, have the right to not have their lives in danger;  Transparency: the organization members, clients and public in general, have the right to not be intentionally misled in the information that is transmitted to them;  Privacy: all citizens have the right to control the access and the use of their personal information either by the governmental organizations, either by the employers and others;  Conscious freedom: all citizens have the right to refuse obedience to orders that violate their religious and moral beliefs;  Expression freedom: all members of the organization and others have the right to criticize ethic or the employers’ actions legally.  Private property: legal systems of most countries recognize the individual right of private property.