Form Making Susan Locsin
Arch 587
Digital architecture with blob type forms will spin the industry on its ear. We will have to
relearn how to determine loads, strengths and structure of 3 dimensional objects.
Building designs can be based on mathematical computations instead of squares,
rectangles and circles. Buildings can also be designed for flow and movement of the
building structure. To create unique new buildings, architects will need to master
calculus and software programming.
New processes are needed for designing buildings that are non static or animate. No
software exists that designs buildings that move and evolve. Currently, cinematic
animation techniques are used with limited success. Buildings are also being developed
to reflect both time and motion.
Buildings are generally built for permanence, not as reusable components or temporary
structures. When the program for a building changes, obsolescence is often the result.
Why can’t we design flexible buildings? Is it limited by forethought, lack of vision, or just
time and money restrictions? I live in an upscale neighborhood in a seven year old
house. It is generally functional, but already outdated. The electrical, mechanical and
wiring systems are inefficient or lacking. There was no thought put into the building
design as how to accommodate changing needs of its occupants. To upgrade the
outdated systems will require a major remodel of the residence.
Using computer to design buildings has helped the architecture industry and pointed out
the many areas in which growth is possible. Computer software can create virtual
environments that are fabulous but extremely cost prohibitive to build with current
construction technologies. There is a wide gap between what can be designed on a
computer versus built with existing technologies. There is an attempt to enhance
construction methods and processes to make the realization of these buildings more
probably.
Very few digitally designed buildings have been built to date. The economics in the U.S.
have limited the investiture in new building technologies, as we are so used to
immediate payback. European countries are more willing to invest in new technologies,
as they see the long term benefits in energy efficiency.
The building trades industry has no incentive to develop new materials and process to
increase efficiency. Local governments are often reluctant to approve and support the
use of new technologies due to the overload of existing work, the cost to evaluate the
new technologies and the training costs to train their personnel in understanding them.
The construction companies are also resistant. The amount of investment to gain
competency in these technologies and the amount of work creates a long payback
