Quantum Mechanics Lecture 16: Spherical Harmonics & Angular Momentum - Prof. M. W. Bromley, Study notes of Quantum Mechanics

Lecture 16 of a quantum mechanics course, focusing on working the angles, spherical harmonics, and angular momentum. Topics include the end of one-dimensional systems, skipping chapters on path integrals and uncertainty, three-dimensional systems, spherical geometry, and the time-dependent schrödinger equation. Emphasis is placed on bound vs scattering energies.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/28/2010

koofers-user-ye9-1
koofers-user-ye9-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 17

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 16 - working the angles
end of 1-D, SHO via Dirac [section 7.4]
skip Chapter 8 on Path Integrals...(don’t read)
skip Chapter 9 on Uncertainty bits...(read)
3-D Systems [section 10.2] (might be back to 10)
skip Chapter 11 on Symmetries...(might also be back)
Spherical geometry... Y`,m Harmonics [section 7.5]
L2, Lx, Ly, Lz, L±/ Rotation ops [section 7.2,7.3,7.4,7.5]
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Quantum Mechanics Lecture 16: Spherical Harmonics & Angular Momentum - Prof. M. W. Bromley and more Study notes Quantum Mechanics in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 16 - working the angles

end of 1-D, SHO via Dirac [section 7.4]

skip Chapter 8 on Path Integrals...(don’t read)

skip Chapter 9 on Uncertainty bits...(read)

3-D Systems [section 10.2] (might be back to 10)

skip Chapter 11 on Symmetries...(might also be back)

Spherical geometry...

Y

`,m

Harmonics [section 7.5]

L

2 , L

x , L

y , L

z (^) , L

±

/ Rotation ops [section 7.2,7.3,7.4,7.5]

End of SHO

1-D problems: work in position or momentum space..

SHO: ladder operators, along with energy eigenstates

ˆa ±

i ˆp

ˆx )

ˆx

=

ˆa

  • ˆ

a − )

and

ˆp

=

i √

mω 2

ˆa

ˆa − )

Given the ground state soln (and its energy):

ψ

0 ( x ) =

ℏ ) 1 / 4 e ( −

(^) mω 2 ℏ

x 2 )

and

E

0

=

ω

3-D time-dep Schr¨

odinger eqn

Easy to generalise

time-dependent

1-D S.E. to 3-D:

i ℏ

∂t∂

(^) | Ψ(

r , t

) 〉

=

H

r , t

) 〉

just modify the classical Hamiltonian operator:

H

x, y, z

m

p x 2

p y 2

p z 2 )

V

x, y, z

Wherein replace:

p x

→ −

i ℏ

∂ ∂x

(^) ,

p y

→ −

i ℏ

∂ ∂y

(^) ,

p z

→ −

i ℏ

∂z∂

(^).

i ℏ

∂t ∂

2

m

2 Ψ +

V

‘Laplacian’

2

∂ 2

∂ 2 x + ∂ 2

∂ 2 y + ∂ 2

∂ 2 z (^).

C.C.R.’s

canonical commutation relations

3-D time-indep Schr¨

odinger eqn

infinite 3-D square well (separation of variables)

Spherical Co-ordinates

Time-indep S.E.:

ℏ 2

2 m (^) ∇

2 ψ

V ψ

Atoms etc... intuitive to work in spherical not cartesian

where, for example, the potential is only

V

r ) .

z

=

r (^) cos

(^) θ

x

r (^) cos

(^) φ

sin

(^) θ

y

=

r

sin

(^) φ

(^) sin

(^) θ

r = √ x 2 + y 2 + z 2

cos

(^) θ

r z

tan

(^) φ

x y

Applying chain rule...

∂x

∂x ∂r

∂r

∂x ∂θ

∂θ

∂x ∂φ

∂φ

gets us to the Laplacian in Spherical coordinates:

2

=

r 1 2

∂r

r 2

∂ ∂r

r 2 sin

(^) θ

∂θ

sin

(^) θ

∂θ

r

2

sin

2

θ

(

2

2 φ

)

Angular equation

F

r ) +

G

θ, φ

So introduce an (arbitrary) separation constant

F

r ) =

`

`

, and

G

θ, φ

`

`

(^1) Consider the angular equation first (radial later!)

Y

[

sin

θ

∂θ

sin

θ

∂θ ∂Y

sin

2 θ ( ∂ 2 Y

2 φ

)]

`

`

sin

(^) θ

∂θ

sin

θ

∂θ ∂Y

) + ( ∂ 2 Y

∂ 2 φ ) = − (

Y

sin

2 θ

Try further separation of variables

Y

θ, φ

θ )Φ(

φ ) :

[

sin

(^) θ

∂θ

sin

θ ∂ Θ

∂θ

`

`

    1. sin

2 θ ]

2 Φ

2 φ

So introduce another separation constant

m

2 ...

• Two angular equations: azimuthal

Another separation constant

m

2

means two angular eqns:

sin

(^) θ

∂θ

sin

θ ∂ Θ

∂θ

`

`

    1. sin

2 θ

=

m

2

2 Φ

∂ 2 φ = − m 2

The second eqn has solns

φ ) =

A

exp(

imφ

Boundary condition on aziumuthal:

φ

  • 2

π ) = Φ(

φ )

e imφ

e 2 πim

e imφ

thus

exp(

πim

so we have

m

The coefficient

A

we absorb over into the polar soln...

associated Legendre functions

Legendre polynomial

P

` ( x )

has degree

`

with parity (eveness or oddness) depending on

`

assoc Legendre funks

P

` (^) m

( x ) = (

x 2 ) | m |

2

d dx

| m | P ` ( x ) :

Note

for

m

> `

then

P

` (^) m

( x ) = 0

(so

`

possible

m

For

`

P

(^0 )

= 1

. For

`

P

(^1 )

= cos

(^) θ, P

(^1 )

= sin

(^) θ

P

(^2 ) (^) ( x ) =

P

2 ( x ) =

x 2 −

P

(^2 ) (^) ( x ) =

√ 1 − x 2 d

dx

P

2 ( x ) = 3

x √ 1 − x 2

P

(^2 ) (^) ( x ) = (

− x 2 ) ( d

dx

) 2 P 2 ( x

x 2 )

P

(^2 )

=

2 1 (^) (3 cos

2 θ

, P

(^2 )

= 3 sin

(^) θ

(^) cos

(^) θ, P

(^2 )

= 3 sin

2 θ

Spherical Harmonics

Finally... we need to normalise these angular functions,

ψ

( r, θ, φ

R ( r ) Y (

θ, φ

R ( r ) Y (

θ, φ

R

r )Θ(

θ )Φ(

φ ) :

∫ | ψ | 2 d 3 r = ∫ | ψ (

r, θ, φ

2

r 2 sin

(^) θ drdθdφ

= ∫ | R | 2 r 2

dr

Y

θ, φ

2 sin

(^) θ dθdφ

require both radial and angular integrals normalised:

0 | R | 2 r 2

dr

and

2 π

0

π

0

Y

θ, φ

2 sin

(^) θ dθdφ

normalised angular functions are spherical harmonics:

Y

m l

θ, φ

`

π

`

m

( ` + | m |

e imφ

P

l (^) m

(cos

(^) θ

)

`

azimuthal quantum number,

m

magnetic quantum

Angular Momentum eigenfunctions

separation of variables gave

ψ

n,`,m

` (^) ( r, θ, φ

n ` m

` 〉

spherical harmonics

Y

m `

`

θ, φ

are the eigenfunctions of

L

2 Y

m `

`

2

sin

(^) θ

[

∂θ

sin

(^) θ

∂θ

sin

(^) θ

∂φ

]

Y

m

`

= ℏ 2 ( `

Y

m

`

`

L

z (^) Y

m `

` = [ − i ℏ ∂

∂φ

]

Y

m `

= ℏ m Y m `

`

ie. good quantum numbers

H

n ` m

` 〉 = E n |

n ` m

` 〉 ,

Shankar 12.2: operator formalism, rotate in

x

y

plane:

U

[

R

φ 0 k~ )] = lim

n →∞

I

ℏ i

N φ

L z ) N = e

0 L z (^) / ℏ

in position-space:

e − φ 0 ∂/∂φ

ψ

( ρ, φ

ψ

( ρ, φ

φ

0 )

Raising / Lowering Operators

Following Shankar 12.5: Assume angular basis states...

L

2 | αβ

α | αβ

and

L

z (^) | αβ

β | αβ

Define raising/lowering operators:

L ± = L x ±

iL

y

they commute as

[

L

z (^) , L

± ] =

L

±

and

[

L

2 , L

± ] = 0

L

z (^) ( L

| αβ

L + L z + ℏ L + ) |

αβ

L + β + ℏ L + ) |

αβ

β + ℏ ) L + |

αβ

similarly

L 2 ( L + |

αβ

L

L

2 | αβ

αL

| αβ

but there are bounds on

α − β 2 ≥ 0

since

αβ

L

2 −

L

z 2 (^) | αβ

αβ

L

x 2

L

y 2 | αβ

L

| αβ

max

and

L

| αβ

min