
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
How firms with different growth prospects and cash flows determine their optimal debt levels. It explains the trade-off theory and its application to firms with high r&d costs and future growth opportunities versus mature, low-growth firms. The document also touches upon the challenges of evaluating whether firms actually choose an optimal capital structure due to managerial incentives.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!

The Optimal Debt Level Firms with high R&D costs and future growth opportunities typically maintain low debt levels. These firms tend to have low current free cash flows, so they need little debt to provide a tax shield or to control managerial spending. Mature, low-growth firms with stable cash flows and tangible assets often fall into the high-debt category. These firms tend to have high free cash flows with few good investment opportunities. Thus, the tax shield and incentive benefits of leverage are likely to be high.
Debt Levels in Practice
The trade-off theory explains how firms should choose their capital structures to maximize value to current shareholders. Evaluating whether they actually do so is not so straightforward, however, as many of the costs of leverage are hard to measure. Why might firms not choose an optimal capital structure? Capital structure decisions, like investment decisions, are made by managers who have their own incentives. Proponents of the management entr enc hme nt theo ry of capi tal stru ctur e beli eve that man ager s cho ose a capital structure primarily to avoid the discipline of debt and maintain their own entrenchment. Thus, managers seek to minimize leverage to prevent the job loss that would accompany financial distress.