Capital Structures and Agency Costs: The Optimal Debt Level for Firms, Study notes of Economics

How firms with different growth prospects and cash flows determine their optimal debt levels. It explains the trade-off theory and its application to firms with high r&d costs and future growth opportunities versus mature, low-growth firms. The document also touches upon the challenges of evaluating whether firms actually choose an optimal capital structure due to managerial incentives.

Typology: Study notes

2018/2019

Uploaded on 08/13/2019

Messi10mahajara
Messi10mahajara 🇫🇷

3.7

(3)

204 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Agency Costs and the Trade-Off Theory
The Optimal Debt Level
Firms with high R&D costs and future growth opportunities typically maintain low debt levels. These
firms tend to have low current free cash flows, so they need little debt to provide a tax shield or to
control managerial spending.
Mature, low-growth firms with stable cash flows and tangible assets often fall into the high-debt
category. These firms tend to have high free cash flows with few good investment opportunities. Thus,
the tax shield and incentive benefits of leverage are likely to be high.
Debt Levels in Practice
The trade-off theory explains how firms should choose their capital structures to maximize value to
current shareholders. Evaluating whether they actually do so is not so straightforward, however, as
many of the costs of leverage are hard to measure.
Why might firms not choose an optimal capital structure? Capital structure decisions, like investment
decisions, are made by managers who have their own incentives. Proponents of the management
entr
enc
hme
nt
theo
ry
of
capi
tal
stru
ctur
e
beli
eve
that
man
ager
s
cho
ose
a capital structure primarily to avoid the discipline of debt and maintain their own entrenchment. Thus,
managers seek to minimize leverage to prevent the job loss that would accompany financial distress.

Partial preview of the text

Download Capital Structures and Agency Costs: The Optimal Debt Level for Firms and more Study notes Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Agency Costs and the Trade-Off Theory

The Optimal Debt Level Firms with high R&D costs and future growth opportunities typically maintain low debt levels. These firms tend to have low current free cash flows, so they need little debt to provide a tax shield or to control managerial spending. Mature, low-growth firms with stable cash flows and tangible assets often fall into the high-debt category. These firms tend to have high free cash flows with few good investment opportunities. Thus, the tax shield and incentive benefits of leverage are likely to be high.

Debt Levels in Practice

The trade-off theory explains how firms should choose their capital structures to maximize value to current shareholders. Evaluating whether they actually do so is not so straightforward, however, as many of the costs of leverage are hard to measure. Why might firms not choose an optimal capital structure? Capital structure decisions, like investment decisions, are made by managers who have their own incentives. Proponents of the management entr enc hme nt theo ry of capi tal stru ctur e beli eve that man ager s cho ose a capital structure primarily to avoid the discipline of debt and maintain their own entrenchment. Thus, managers seek to minimize leverage to prevent the job loss that would accompany financial distress.