QNo : 2 Lawyers need to understand logical reasoning if they are going to be able to
understand law itself, because most laws, most of the time, are based on logic.
Introduction :
Logic is the study of correct methodology. It is important for every individual to think logically,
only to approach the true result. World has been evolving and changing rapidly and everybody
would go to the facts and figures which are true in nature.
Masses living here want to have mysterious things which eventually attract them but those who
are able of being proved. Any person who is able to study logic and reasoning would be more
familiar to stick with such principles and rules which are certain. However logic plays a vital role
in law and in the life of a lawyer as well. It eventually compels him to find a way or argument,
which is strong in nature and could be denied by the lack of facts and truth. As in the case of
Marbury vs Madison 1803, John marshall states that it is the judiciary which tells us what law is
and how to basically implement it for the sake of peace and harmony of the society. Similarly
logic guides a lawyer and judge in what manner any argument or certain law is supposed to
proceed.
Law does rely on syllogism which provokes the deductive argument and helps to construe any
legal matter to be dealt on the premises of truth.
Moreover Aristotle has argued logic is the key aspect for lawyer to go with hand in hand, logic
provides more prosperous and appropriate way to convey legal content, Law is the technical
area to be deal, it usually come in contradict with several things, and the idea of application of
logic help to solve these mysterious things by empowering such provisions which are helpful for
society. As in the case of jacobson v Massachusetts, where the state has enacted a law to
provide vaccine to every individual freely, for protecting them from deadly virus and if anybody
would not inject those vaccines in his body, would be penalized. In contrast jacobson was the
person who disagreed because his body gets allergy of vaccine and asked court for his
fundamental rights and freedom of his will, Court by applying logic, held the decision that law is
about to protect every individual in the state, whereas it could not put in danger every citizen of
state only for the one person. The clear distinction among the core concepts appears when the
case study has to be applied by the lawyers as some case laws are based upon a whole nature
of being implied in an investigation method. Logic basically gives the ability to distinguish
between the fragile nature and prescribed actions. With the help of logic we get to know each
and every stances connected to the facts which later creates a general perception equivalent to
the matter required. Not only this, but also it elevates the momentum of cases in a flow. The
professional approach of a person is indebtedly rationalized by the logical framework of the
matter. Furthermore as a legal representation of what is acquainted with the question masks the
approach of the lawyer to prevent certain bizarre manners as well. Logic deals with the
technicality of law as in the case of (Roe v wed) a woman was raped and got pregnant as in the
United States of America, abortion is illegal but to uphold the right of that girl, Court has to give
decision in a critical way.
