


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Authors have always been looking for new and innovative ways of aesthetical expression and they have been quick to take advantage of the new possibilities, offered by the World Wide Web and the Internet. Today, there is a respectable community – in terms of size and quality – of “digital poets”, who publish their texts in the internet and whose literature above all shares one mutual featur
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Adickesallee 1 60322 Frankfurt [email protected]
Abstract Authors have always been looking for new and innovative ways of aesthetical expression and they have been quick to take advantage of the new possibilities, offered by the World Wide Web and the Internet. Today, there is a respectable community – in terms of size and quality – of “digital poets”, who publish their texts in the internet and whose literature above all shares one mutual feature: a prominent and crucial use of computer technologies. Being the cultural heritage for future generations, electronic literature is worth preserving, just as any other form of contemporary literature. Yet, due to its use of interactive and dynamic elements and reliance on the latest technology, contemporary electronic literature is extremely vulnerable and difficult to document. While archives, libraries and museums are still trying to develop preservation strategies for electronic literature, many of the early works have already volatilized. In Germany, two institutions and a cooperative network have joined forces in order to address this challenge concertedly: nestor, the network of expertise in long-term storage of digital resources, the German Literature Archive, and the German National Library.
As opposed to the preservation of research data, no comprehensive, international efforts address the preservation of electronic literature. So far, there have only been a few initiatives in the USA which address the need to preserve electronic literature, such as the Preservation, Archiving, and Dissemination (PAD) project of the Electronic Literature Organization or Archive-it, a collaboration of the Library of Congress, the Electronic Literature Organization and the Internet Archive. These projects are still in their early stages of development. In Germany, the Deutsche Literaturarchiv Marbach (DLA, German Literature Archive Marbach) is responsible for collecting, archiving and making available contemporary German literature. Primary sources and secondary literature are collected as comprehensively as possible. Since 1997, the DLA has expanded its efforts to electronic literature, beginning with the inclusion of the collecting field “e-journals”. The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB, German National Library) is the legal deposit library for all German and German-language publications since 1913.
As of 2006, native digital publications are also included in the German legal deposit law. In cooperation with nestor, the German network of expertise in long-term storage of digital resources, DLA and DNB have taken the initiative to develop a preservation strategy for electronic literature in Germany. In March 2008, they managed to bring together the relevant stakeholders in the German National Library in Frankfurt: authors, archivists, librarians, and legal experts met to discuss the challenges of long-term preservation for electronic literature. [1] The issues discussed in relation to the collection and preservation of electronic literature included (among others): selection, collection, context, intellectual property rights, and technical issues, the most crucial aspects of which will be presented in the following.
“Electronic literature” is a simple-sounding label for a broad and multifaceted literary field that has evolved from as well as together with the internet. According to the U.S. Electronic Literature Organization, the term refers to “works with important literary aspects that take advantage of the capabilities and contexts provided by the stand-alone or networked computer” [2]. This includes two aspects: A technical and a sociological/communicational aspect. Apart from integrating the technological opportunities which the internet provides, electronic literature makes use of the particular interactive communication structure of the internet. Electronic literature has (in the most cases) emancipated from the static, linear text narration to which print literature is bound. With the capabilities of the internet, innovative literary forms have developed in recent years: e.g. hypertext fiction, interactive and collaborative fiction, digital and audio-visual poetry, poetry that is generated by computers, or readable computer art installations. The Electronic Literature Directory [3] introduced for browsing purposes a twofold genre classification: Genre/Length vs. Technique/Genre. While the former lists the relatively traditional categories Poetry, Fiction, Drama, Nonfiction, the latter distinguishes between the internet-specific literary forms Hypertext, Reader
Collaboration, Other Interaction, Recorded Reading/Performance, Animated Text, and Other Audio/Video/Animation, Prominent Graphics, Generated Text.
The examples given in the paragraph above illustrate internet’s primary forms of literature. There is no doubt that such works – like other contemporary literature, too
In order to guarantee long term availability of electronic literature resources, libraries and archives store local copies on their servers, respectively repositories. To this end, the selected resources can be harvested from the internet once or in periodic intervals. Archives and libraries can already choose among a range of existing software solutions. According to a predefined harvesting
policy, a list of predefined URLs is downloaded to the library’s or archive’s server automatically. In contrast to printed works, where copies of published editions are collected, the collection of electronic literature requires new agreements. The definition of “edition” is challenged by the technological progress. The conventions of the print era can most likely be applied to electronic journals, which are usually issued periodically. Every new, completed issue can be collected. It becomes more complicated with independent literary works, when borders between different editions are blurred because a version is constantly changed, refreshed, complemented etc. Where does one draw a line between different versions with regard to form and content, where does a new edition begin? The same applies to authors’ homepages, which are regularly updated, and to ever active blogs. Shall every change be reported and each revised version be transformed into an archival object? Shall objects be harvested weekly? Monthly? Daily? Shall old versions be overwritten or preserved together with the latest version? With regard to such questions, archivists and librarians, if necessary together with authors, need to reach sensible agreements. At the Frankfurt workshop, the authors agreed with the archivists and librarians on a (rather traditional) approach to collect authors’ homepages and primary works, literary magazines and dialogue forms like blogs. The German Literature Archive already collects, indexes, and stores such material in a pilot operation. To this end, it cooperates with the state library service centre of Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) and shares the BSZ Online Archive. During the pilot phase, the German Literature Archive contacted the rights owners of selected literary resources and asked for their permission for harvesting their sites. Only those sites for which permission was received were then downloaded to the BSZ Online Archive, indexed, and made accessible via the Online Catalogue of the German Literature Archive.
Shapshot of a catalogue entry of an electronic journal at the German Literature Archive with reference to the original source on the internet and to the archival copy at BSZ Online Archive.
The technical complexity of preserving electronic literature increases with each phase described above. Objects of the first two phases – text files and hypertext - can relatively easily be preserved as single objects. The third phase, networked writing, produces multilayered objects. For preservation, such complex objects have to be fragmented into a number of single objects. Emulation appears to be a workable solution, too. The preservation of objects from phase four, pending writing, requires very elaborate emulators. The fundamental claim of the German Literature Archive and the German National Library is to document and preserve the digital avant-garde literature as comprehensively as possible. This implies that on the one hand neither of the two institutions wants to exclude any data formats from its collections. On the other hand, with an increasing amount of archived formats, the complexity of preservation measures increases manifoldly. The participants of the Frankfurt workshop agreed that the best way seems to be to involve authors in the preservation process of their more complex works in order to document the entire compilation environment. Especially in order to successfully and adequately preserve the more complex networked works and dynamic forms of the “pending writing” process, the collaboration of authors, archivists, and librarians appears necessary.
Authors and archivists as well as librarians are troubled by many unresolved legal questions relating to the preservation of electronic literature: Under what circumstances are archives and libraries allowed to create copies of the archived objects? Must copies be authorised by authors? Is the owner of a literary blog allowed to grant intellectual property rights on all entries in his blog to the archive? What about the rights of third parties like web designers? The German National Library collects electronic literature under national legal deposit legislation. It does not have to request the right holders’ consent before harvesting their websites. The German Literature Archive and other archiving projects are faced with the necessity to ask permission every single time they want to collect a new web resource. The fact that national legal deposit libraries are allowed to collect web resources does not mean that they are entitled to make them automatically available. Like other libraries, the German National Library has to negotiate access conditions individually with the right holders. In order to simplify the resolution of such intellectual copyright issues, the participants of the Frankfurt workshop advocated the adoption of public licences for electronic literature, of which Creative Commons might be the most widely known.
In a field as multifaceted as electronic literature, the involvement of authors in preservation processes seems strongly advisable. The potential synergy that lies in a common consent with regard to selection criteria, the process of collection building, legal solutions, and the technical framework, to mention the most crucial aspects, increases the likelihood that today’s electronic literature will be preserved for future generations. The Frankfurt workshop can be seen as a first step in the right direction of such collaboration for the German-speaking area. The participants are determined not only to continue but even to extend their collaboration: Further steps are envisaged, such as the compilation of a “preservation guide for authors”.
[1] Documentation of the workshop is available from URL: http://www.langzeitarchivierung.de/modules.php?op=mo dload&name=Downloads&file=index&req=viewsdownl oad&sid= [2] Electronic Literature Organization. URL: http://eliterature.org/about/ [3] Electronic Literature Directory. URL: http://directory.eliterature.org/index.php [4] Beat Suter: Das Neue Schreiben 1.0. (2004) URL: http://www.netzliteratur.net/suter/dasneueschreiben1.htm l.