Materials Selection - Problem Set #4 - Fall 2008 | EMA 4714, Assignments of Materials science

Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Mecholsky; Class: MATERIALS SELECTION; Subject: MATERIALS ENGINEERING; University: University of Florida; Term: Spring 2008;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/11/2009

koofers-user-w0v
koofers-user-w0v 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Problem Set 4
EMA 4714 - Materials Selection and Failure Analysis
Due Monday, February 11, 2008 – 8:30AM
Dieter Exercise 5.12
In the search for more environmentally friendly design, paper cups have replaced Styrofoam
cups in some fast-food restaurants. These cups are not as good insulators, and the paper cups
often get too hot for the hand. A design team is in search of a better disposal coffee cup. The
designs to be evaluated are:
[a] the current paper cup
[b] a standard Styrofoam cup
[c]] a rigid injection-molded cup with a handle
[d] a double-wall disposable plastic cup
[e] a paper cup with a pull-out handle
[f] a paper cup with a cellular wall.
These design concepts are to be evaluated with the current paper cup as the datum.
The engineering characteristics on which the cups are evaluated are:
1. Temperature in the hand
2. Temperature of the outside of the cup
3. Material environmental impact
4. Indenting force of cup wall
5. Porosity of cup wall
6. Manufacturing complexity
7. Ease of stacking the cups
8. Ease of use by the customer
9. Temperature loss of coffee over time
Using your knowledge of fast-food coffee cups, use the Pugh concept selection method to select
the most promising design.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Materials Selection - Problem Set #4 - Fall 2008 | EMA 4714 and more Assignments Materials science in PDF only on Docsity!

Problem Set 4 EMA 4714 - Materials Selection and Failure Analysis Due Monday, February 11, 2008 – 8:30AM Dieter Exercise 5. In the search for more environmentally friendly design, paper cups have replaced Styrofoam cups in some fast-food restaurants. These cups are not as good insulators, and the paper cups often get too hot for the hand. A design team is in search of a better disposal coffee cup. The designs to be evaluated are: [a] the current paper cup [b] a standard Styrofoam cup [c]] a rigid injection-molded cup with a handle [d] a double-wall disposable plastic cup [e] a paper cup with a pull-out handle [f] a paper cup with a cellular wall. These design concepts are to be evaluated with the current paper cup as the datum. The engineering characteristics on which the cups are evaluated are:

  1. Temperature in the hand
  2. Temperature of the outside of the cup
  3. Material environmental impact
  4. Indenting force of cup wall
  5. Porosity of cup wall
  6. Manufacturing complexity
  7. Ease of stacking the cups
  8. Ease of use by the customer
  9. Temperature loss of coffee over time Using your knowledge of fast-food coffee cups, use the Pugh concept selection method to select the most promising design.
  1. Dieter Exercise 5. Four preliminary designs for sport-utility vehicles [SUVs] had the characteristics listed in the table below. First, see if you can get the same weighting factors as listed in the table. [Instructor’s comment: Weighting factors arrived at by Dieter were based on an “objective tree” (Figure 5.15) in which he arranged his characteristics into three criteria: “cost”, “comfort” and “other”.] Using the weighted decision matrix, which design looks to be the most promising? [Instructor’s comment: scores were obtained using weighting factors and some kind of point evaluation scale (c.f. Table 5.8) - see section 5.9.5 (p 188)] characteristics parameter wgt factor Design A Design B Design C Design D gas mileage mpg 0.175 20 16 15 20 range miles 0.075 300 240 260 400 ease to convert to 4WD rating 0.070 very good very good good poor load capacity lbs 0.105 1,000 700 1,000 600 cost of rep avg of 5 parts

ride comfort rating 0.400 poor very good good fair