paediatric patient Charlie Gard, who had a rare mitochondrial DNA
depletion syndrome, meaning he had progressive brain damage and
muscle failure.
the case was the differing opinions of Charlie’s parents and the doctors
at Great Ormond Street Hospital,
Charlie Gard’s parents wanted Charlie to be treated with a trial of a
nucleoside therapy, a therapy originally supported by the doctors in
charge of Charlie’s care-was an untested and unlicensed drug
However, following a deterioration in Charlie’s condition before the
treatment could be approved and administered, the medical team
decided that the treatment was no longer an option,
Key points to include:
Condition that Charlie Gard had
$– mitochondrial DNA
depletion syndrome
Reason as to why this case was an ethical dilemma
$–
Healthcare team wanting to take Charlie off life support, parents
did not agree (child case)
Key points of the case
$– Treatment agreed, then Charlie’s
condition worsened, treatment no longer viable. However,
treatment offered by specialist in the US
Why is this case important?
$– what has it shown us about
ethical dilemmas we may face as future doctors?
What Do You Think You Would Find Most
Challenging About Being a Doctor?
$should show that you are aware of your strengths and weaknesses. It
takes personal insight to recognise the aspects of a career in Medicine
that you might find harder to cope with.
