Metric Spaces, Lecture Notes - Mathematics, Study notes of Calculus

Metric spaces, Metrics a Nation of Distance, Examples, Convergence

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/08/2011

deville
deville 🇺🇸

4.7

(23)

390 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Metric Spaces
Adrian Down 16779577
August 2, 2005
1 Metrics: a notion of distance
So far in analysis on R, every definition (convergence, Cauchy, continuity)
has included statements like |xy|< ”. The idea is that this |xy|
represents a distance from xto y.
A distance should satisfy the properties:
i) |xy| 0,x, y R
ii) |xy|= 0 x=y
iii) |xy|=|yx|
iv) “Triangle inequality”: |xy|+|yz| |xz|,x, y, z
Definition: a metric space is a set of “objects” Stogether with a function
don the set of pairs (x, y), x, y Ssuch that
d(x, y)R,x, y S
1)d(x, y)0,x, y S
2)d(x, y) = 0 x=y
3)d(x, y) = d(y, x),x, y S
4)d(x, y) + d(y, z )d(x, z),x, y, z S
dis called the metric on S. May write (S, d) to specify the metric.
4) is called the triangle inequality; it is the most important, and it is
usually the hardest to verify.
2 Examples
1) (R, d) is a metric space where d(x, y) = |xy|
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Metric Spaces, Lecture Notes - Mathematics and more Study notes Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Metric Spaces

Adrian Down 16779577

August 2, 2005

1 Metrics: a notion of distance

So far in analysis on R, every definition (convergence, Cauchy, continuity) has included statements like “|x − y| < ”. The idea is that this |x − y| represents a distance from x to y. A distance should satisfy the properties: i) |x − y| ≥ 0 , ∀x, y ∈ R ii) |x − y| = 0 → x = y iii) |x − y| = |y − x| iv) “Triangle inequality”: |x − y| + |y − z| ≥ |x − z|, ∀x, y, z Definition: a metric space is a set of “objects” S together with a function d on the set of pairs (x, y), x, y ∈ S such that

d(x, y) ∈ R, ∀x, y ∈ S 1)d(x, y) ≥ 0 , ∀x, y ∈ S 2)d(x, y) = 0 → x = y 3)d(x, y) = d(y, x), ∀x, y ∈ S 4)d(x, y) + d(y, z) ≥ d(x, z), ∀x, y, z ∈ S

d is called the metric on S. May write (S, d) to specify the metric.

  1. is called the triangle inequality; it is the most important, and it is usually the hardest to verify.

2 Examples

  1. (R, d) is a metric space where d(x, y) = |x − y|
  1. “Discrete metric space”: S is any set, and define

d(x, y) =

1 x, y ∈ S, x 6 = y 0 x ∈ S, x = y

  1. “Euclidean k-space”:

S = {(x 1 , x 2 ,... , xk)|xi ∈ R, 1 ≤ i ≤ k}

d(x, y) =

( (^) k ∑

i=

(xi − yi)^2

)^12

Properties 1, 2, and 3 are clear. Property 4 takes work. Best way is to consider dot products of vectors. This is the most important metric space that we will cover. The given metric space is called the standard metric on Rk.

  1. “Manhattan metric”:

S = Rk

d(x, y) =

∑^ k

i=

|xi − yi|

Properties 1, 2, and 3 are easy. For 4, use the triangle inequality on R, ∑ |xi − yi| +

|yi − zi| ≥

|xi − zi|

5) C[0, 1] :

S = {f |f is a continous function on [0, 1]} d(f, g) = sup{|f (x) − g(x)||x ∈ [0, 1]}

Note that f, g continuous on [0, 1] → f − g is continuous on [0, 1] → d(f, g) exists. To verify property 2,

d(f, g) = 0 → sup{|f (x) − g(x)|} = 0 → |f (x) − g(x)| = 0, ∀x → f (x) = g(x), ∀x

Examples:

  1. (R, d), d(x, y) = |x − y| is complete by the Completeness axiom
  2. (Q, d), d(x, y) = |x − y| is not complete
  3. C[0, 1] is complete.
  4. (Rk, d), d is the Euclidean metric, is complete. To prove it, we need lemmas Lemma 1: (xn) is a convergent sequence in Rk^ → (xni )∞ n=1 is convergent in R, ∀i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k. Proof: Assume (xn) is convergent and xn^ converges to x. Let  > 0 be given. ∃N such that

n > N →

( (^) k ∑

i=

(xni − xnj )^2

)^12

(xni − xi)^2 < ^2

→ (xni − xi)^2 < ^2 , ∀i → |xni − xi| < , ∀i → (^) nlim→∞ xni = xi, ∀i

Now assume that (xn 1 ), (xn 2 ),... , (xnk ) converge in R. Let

nlim→∞ xn^1 =^ x^1 ,... ,^ nlim→∞ xnk^ =^ xk

Let  > 0 be given. Then ∃N 1 ,... , Nk ∈ N such that

n > N 1 → |x 1 − xn 1 | <

k

,... , n > Nk → |xk − xnk | <

k

Let N = max{N 1 , N 2 ,... , Nk}. Then Lemma 2: (xn) is Cauchy in Rk^ if and only if (xni ) is Cauchy in R, ∀i Proof: left to the reader Now, if (xn) is Cauchy in Rk(xni ) is Cauchy in R, ∀i → (xni ) is convergent ∀i → (xn) is convergent in Rk. So Rk^ is complete. What’s useful are the lemmas: to examine the properties of something in Rk, look at the components of the vector one at a time. Definition: A set A ⊆ S, (S, d) is a metric space is bounded if ∃x ∈ S and ∃M ∈ R such that d(a, x) ≤ M, ∀a ∈ A. Definition: the open ball around x with radius R is BR(x) = {s ∈ S|d(s, x) < R}. The closed ball = B¯R(x) = {s ∈ S|d(s, x) ≤ R}. A is bounded if A ⊆ B¯R(x) for some x, R.

Theorem: if (xn) is a bounded sequence in Rk, then ∃ a convergent sub- sequence (xnl^ )∞ l=1. Proof: by induction on k: base case k = 1 is the Bolzano-Weirstrass theorem on R. Assume the theorem is true for Rk. Let (xn) be a bounded sequence in Rk+1. Let yn^ = (xn 1 , xn 2 ,... , xnk ) ∈ Rk^ → (yn) is bounded in Rk^ and therefor has a convergent subsequence (ynl^ ). So (xn kl+1)∞ l=1 is bounded in R → ∃ a

convergent subsequence (x

nlj k+1)

∞ j=1 →^ (x

nlj k+1,... , x

nlj k , x

nlj k+1) is a convergent subsequence of (xn). Idea is that we use our knowledge of R to bootstrap ourself up to as many dimensions as we want.