



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Motivation to employee and encouragement
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Critically discuss how managers may best develop reward strategies to motivate knowledge workers
Traditional theories of motivation were often characterised by what is termed “content theories”. These were pioneered in the 1940s to 1960s and were based on needs and wants – or intrinsic/extrinsic and social factors. At a basic level McGregor’s X and Y theory even questioned broad motivation. Theory X described workers who were at a basic level not interested in work, had little interest motivation and needed to be controlled. This fitted with bureaucratic, top down Taylorist principles and the carrot/stick approach. Reward systems were devised therefore from achievement of
set goals by management – ie number of items produced, sold or purely attendance. Theory Y is more progressive and assumes the opposite – people are highly motivated to perform and as such should be given responsibility to grow and develop.
A more progressive reward system would be considered based on progression aims, job enrichment and empowered decision making. Maslow sought to create a pyramid of motivation taking wider social and human factors into account (see below)
Broadly speaking this worked on the premise that you have to satisfy basic human (heat, sex, water) needs before moving up to social needs – affiliation, belonging and so on to the self-actualisation phase. Reward strategies were therefore designed to facilitate this journey. It seems logical from a management perspective however that it has flaws in that it doesn’t apply ratings to each and assumes everyone has some
reward strategies must be under wider based than just motivation and look to best reflect employee engagement (EE) principles. Reward strategies must take into account factors such as alignment to the organisation, the individual’s development needs and also be tailored and flexible to the individual. Typically an effective reward strategy is part of a wider Performance Management (PMS) system. This doesn’t have to be formed, and dependent on the size/capability and lack of bureaucratic structure within an organisation than lack of formality may be advantageous. However the PMS and by proxy, the reward system must be:
STRATEGIC – aligned to organisation objectives INTEGRATED – not work in isolation to other individuals and groups.
Given the changing and dynamic nature of organisations therefore the designed reward system must ensure.
reduced. Therefore recognition of reward can be linked to softer “behavioural” type skills and contribution.
The major issue in my opinion in terms of reward is pay. Various studies place it at different levels of importance in EE in relation to immediate leadership, advancement opportunities etc but in respect of reward then it is key. Various arguments exist as to performance related pay (Herzberg’s motivation states base pay does not motivate). For instance it can demonstrate a clear link as to what is important, can provide a direct link to individual performance and can support retention drives. Conversely it can create an individualistic culture, a focus on short termism and lack of teams. Pay as a reward can manifest in the equity theory as it does in the Aberdeen Oil and Gas industry. Pay is the key driver and as such a spiral of increasing pay has taken over with people regularly moving for a relatively small increase in pay due to perceived inequities. This has created a leapfrog effect (Ian Wood report 2014) and co- operation between individuals and organisations has taken place. Companies have tried to redress this by share schemes, working from home options and flexible hours. The solution therefore for knowledge based workers has to be a wider solution not just based on traditional carrot and stick (or in the case of Aberdeen – more carrots) but a mix of monetary and non-monetary reward.
In conclusion therefore I would recommend a balance reward strategy based on the following:
culture where this is positively encouraged.
Reward strategies don’t have to be purely individual and if the management is trying to create a culture of team work with the wider knowledge workers then rewards can be team based – away days, nights out, other privileges as selected by the team. This also increases any fears about equity theory and subsequent disharmony.