Multi-Grid Method - Advanced Device Simulation - Lecture Slides, Slides of Computer Science

These are the Lecture Slides of Advanced Device Simulation which includes Multi-Grid Method, Complexity of Linear Solvers, Sparse Cholesky, Poisson’s Equation, Iterative Methods, Multiple Scales, Coarse Structure, Red-Black Variations, Conjugate Gradients etc. Key important points are: Multi-Grid Method, Complexity of Linear Solvers, Sparse Cholesky, Poisson’s Equation, Iterative Methods, Multiple Scales, Coarse Structure, Red-Black Variations, Conjugate Gradients

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 03/21/2013

dharmendrae
dharmendrae 🇮🇳

4.6

(19)

126 documents

1 / 41

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Multi-Grid Method
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29

Partial preview of the text

Download Multi-Grid Method - Advanced Device Simulation - Lecture Slides and more Slides Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Multi-Grid Method

Complexity of linear solvers

2D 3D

Sparse Cholesky: O(n 1.5^ ) O(n^2 )

CG, exact arithmetic:

O(n^2 ) O(n^2 )

CG, no precond: O(n 1.5^ ) O(n 1.33^ )

CG, modified IC: O(n 1.25^ ) O(n 1.17^ )

CG, support trees: O(n 1.20^ ) -> O(n 1+^ ) O(n 1.75^ ) -> O(n 1.31^ )

Multigrid: O(n) O(n)

n 1/2^ n 1/

Time to solve model problem (Poisson’s equation) on regular mesh

Literature

= f(x)

  • Poisson’s equation in 1D: ∂^2 u/∂x - 2 - - -1 2 - - -1 2 - - -1 2 - - -1
    • T = -1^2 -

Multigrid Methods

  • We studied several iterative methods
    • Jacobi, SOR, Guass-Seidel, Red-Black variations, Conjugate Gradients (CG)
    • All use sparse matrix-vector multiply (nearest neighbor communication on grid)
  • Key problem with iterative methods is that:
    • detail (short wavelength) is correct
    • convergence controlled by coarse (long wavelength) structure
  • In simple methods one needs of order N^2 iterations to get good results
    • Ironically, one goes to large N (fine mesh) to get detail
    • If all you wanted was coarse structure, a smaller mesh would be fine
  • Basic idea in multigrid is key in many areas of science
    • Solve a problem at multiple scales
  • We get coarse structure from small N and fine detail from large N
    • Good qualitative idea but how do we implement?

Slide source: Geoffrey Fox and (indirectly) Ulrich Ruede Docsity.com

Multigrid Overview

  • Basic Algorithm:
    • Replace problem on fine grid by an approximation on a coarser grid
    • Solve the coarse grid problem approximately, and use the solution as a starting guess for the fine-grid problem, which is then iteratively updated
    • Solve the coarse grid problem recursively, i.e. by using a still coarser grid approximation, etc.
  • Success depends on coarse grid solution being a good approximation to the fine grid

Multigrid Sketch in 1D

  • Consider a 2m^ +1 grid in 1D for simplicity
  • Let P (i)^ be the problem of solving the discrete Poisson

equation on a 2i+1 grid in 1D

  • Write linear system as T(i) * x(i) = b(i)
  • P (m)^ , P (m-1)^ , … , P(1)^ is sequence of problems from finest

to coarsest

Multigrid Sketch in 2D

  • Consider a 2m^ +1 by 2m^ +1 grid in 2D
  • Let P (i)^ be the problem of solving the discrete Poisson

equation on a 2i+1 by 2i+1 grid in 2D

  • Write linear system as T(i) * x(i) = b(i)
  • P (m)^ , P (m-1)^ , … , P(1)^ is sequence of problems from finest

to coarsest

Basic Multigrid Ideas

  • In picture, relax is application of standard iteration scheme
    • “solve” short wavelength solution at a given level
    • i.e. use Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, Conjugate Gradient
  • Interpolation is taking a solution at a coarser grid and interpolating to find a solution at half the grid size
  • Restriction is taking solution at given grid and averaging to find solution at coarser grid

k

k+

Interpolate Restrict

Slide source: Geoffrey Fox Docsity.com

Multigrid Operators

  • For problem P(i)^ at varying coarsening levels (i, grid size grows with i):
    • b(i) is the Right Hand Side (RHS) and
    • x(i) is the current estimated solution
  • All the following operators just average values on neighboring grid points (so information moves fast on coarse grids)
  • The restriction operator R(i) maps P(i)^ to P(i-1)
    • Restricts problem on fine grid P(i)^ to coarse grid P(i-1)
    • Uses sampling or averaging
    • b(i-1)= R(i) (b(i))
  • The interpolation operator In(i-1) maps approx. solution x(i-1) to x(i)
    • Interpolates solution on coarse grid P(i-1)^ to fine grid P(i)
    • x(i) = In(i-1)(x(i-1))
  • The solution operator S(i) takes P(i)^ and improves solution x(i)
    • Uses “weighted” Jacobi or SOR on single level of grid
    • x (^) improved (i) = S(i) (b(i), x(i))
  • Overall algorithm, then details of operators

both live on grids of size 2 i-

This is called a V-Cycle

• Just a picture of the call graph

• In time a V-cycle looks like the following

Multigrid Algorithm: procedure MG(level, A, u, f)

  • if level = coarsest then
    • solve coarsest grid equation by another method “exactly”
  • else
    • smooth Alevel^ u = f (m 1 times)
    • Compute residual r = f - Alevel^ u
    • Restrict F = R r ( R is Restriction Operator)
    • Call MG( level + 1, A(level+1)^ , V, F) (m (^) c times)
    • Interpolate v = P V (Interpolate new solution at this level)
    • correct u (^) new = u + v
    • smooth Au (^) new = f (m 2 times) and
    • set u = u (^) new
  • endif
  • endprocedure A^

level (^) uexact = f

uexact = u + v A level^ v = r = f - Alevel^ u

Slide source: Geoffrey Fox Docsity.com

Elements of Multigrid

1 st^ observation towards multigrid

  • Many relaxation schemes have the smoothing property: oscillatory error modes are quickly eliminated, while smooth modes are often very slow to disappear.
  • In multigrid, this adversity is turned around: the idea is to use coarse grids to take advantage of smoothing.

Reason #1 Coarse Grids

Nested Iteration

Coarse grids can be used to compute an improved initial guess for the fine grid relaxation. This is advantageous because:

o Relaxation on the coarse-grid is much cheaper: half as many points in 1D, one-fourth in 2D, one- eight in 3D o Relaxation on the coarse grid is marginally faster